This day on June 7
None

Happy Birthday To: lazY[o]il, spoon13

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42)
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326152]
Mon, 08 January 2007 01:00 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 3935
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

3 Cups

/images/logos/edm_comp.gif/images/logos/los_comp.gif
Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42)
Game Time: 8:30 pm
Broadcasters: Sportsnet, 630 CHED Online Radio



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326167 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 08:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
halfafrog  is currently offline halfafrog
Messages: 1023
Registered: March 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ

1 Cup

with a stranglehold on last in the NW, and the Canucks now 7 points up.....this game and the next 5 to 10 are absolutely must wins. They have to play with desperation. Watching the Canucks win on the 6th or 7th shot last night left me nauseated.....


So this is what hope feels like?

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326168 is a reply to message #326167 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 08:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HBomb  is currently offline HBomb
Messages: 1554
Registered: March 2001

1 Cup

Yes, the Canucks are 7 points up.

However

- The Oilers are 2 games in hand.
- The Canucks are playing WAY over their heads right now.
- The Oilers are severely underachieving.
- The two teams still have 3 head-to-head games left, 2 at Rexall.

I am not in full panic-mode, yet.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326173 is a reply to message #326168 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 09:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BigDog  is currently offline BigDog
Messages: 30
Registered: March 2004
Location: Kelowna

No Cups

Not full blown panic mode 'YET' Bomb, but with a couple more poor showings from the Oilers we should be.

And I must say that I don't have the most confidence in this group to turn things around. I hope they can, but they really seem to be lacking in something I can't put my finger on. Im not sure that a good dman is enough to pull them out of this funk their in.

Anyone else feel this way? confused2



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326174 is a reply to message #326173 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 09:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HBomb  is currently offline HBomb
Messages: 1554
Registered: March 2001

1 Cup

BigDog wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 09:22

Not full blown panic mode 'YET' Bomb, but with a couple more poor showings from the Oilers we should be.

And I must say that I don't have the most confidence in this group to turn things around. I hope they can, but they really seem to be lacking in something I can't put my finger on. Im not sure that a good dman is enough to pull them out of this funk their in.

Anyone else feel this way? confused2


Actually, I saw some very good things on Thursday and Friday night. Two losses that could have easily been wins.

To me, that's the sign of a team about to bust out of a slump. It's the opposite of the end of a hot streak, where you're winning games you should be losing.

4 games this week, and I honestly think the Oilers win 3 of them.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326178 is a reply to message #326174 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 09:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BigDog  is currently offline BigDog
Messages: 30
Registered: March 2004
Location: Kelowna

No Cups

They were a little better in the last 2 games but they are such a fragile bunch. The sad thing is the core of this group has been together for a few years and its the same year after year. It would be nice if they could figure things out.

Actually I thought the game against Van was the best that Lupul has played. He seems to be giving a little extra effort. He needs to learn how to battle on the boards. I would have thought that a guy with his size would be more assertive but I guess thats not his game. I guess I needed some time to figure out his style of play. I hope he keeps battling.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326185 is a reply to message #326178 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 10:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
halfafrog  is currently offline halfafrog
Messages: 1023
Registered: March 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ

1 Cup

I agree they played a lot better but still lost....thats what Phoenix was doing before they went on their winning streak. Playing a lot better but still losing, unfortunately they did it for 10 games before they really started a streak. This team has been so hot and cold all year long, and they can win any game when they set their minds to it.....I seriously wonder if its a motivational problem at times. I actually am expecting the Oil to start to streak....and I did notice they have 2 games in hand on the Canucks but its still nauseating to see the Canucks go on a 7 game winning streak, of which I believe 4 or 5 were in OT or a shootout....

I am hoping the Canucks have a tough road trip when they take on every team in the Northeast in the next week or so, I think the Bruins are the only exception of the Division. Hard to know who to cheer for to lose when Toronto plays the Nucks



So this is what hope feels like?

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326191 is a reply to message #326185 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 10:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Superintendent  is currently offline Superintendent
Messages: 1060
Registered: March 2006
Location: City of Champions

1 Cup

halfafrog wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 10:37

I agree they played a lot better but still lost....thats what Phoenix was doing before they went on their winning streak. Playing a lot better but still losing, unfortunately they did it for 10 games before they really started a streak. This team has been so hot and cold all year long, and they can win any game when they set their minds to it.....I seriously wonder if its a motivational problem at times. I actually am expecting the Oil to start to streak....and I did notice they have 2 games in hand on the Canucks but its still nauseating to see the Canucks go on a 7 game winning streak, of which I believe 4 or 5 were in OT or a shootout....


This post reminded me of a good quote for the Oil:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/vizual/imageHA9.jpg
"You put your mind to it, you can accomplish ANYTHING."
-George Mcfly from Back to the Future

If this team plays like they've been playing lately, but STOPS with the friggin turnovers in their own end and the neutral zone, they should get the W tonight.

[Updated on: Mon, 08 January 2007 10:54]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326203 is a reply to message #326191 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 11:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BIG JT  is currently offline BIG JT
Messages: 92
Registered: March 2006

No Cups

Anyone know if Reasoner is infact playing tonight cause I heard he was down with the flu or something?


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326241 is a reply to message #326191 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 13:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MoogintheHOF  is currently offline MoogintheHOF
Messages: 63
Registered: March 2006
Location: Wishing I was in E-town

No Cups

Superintendent wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 10:53

halfafrog wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 10:37

I agree they played a lot better but still lost....thats what Phoenix was doing before they went on their winning streak. Playing a lot better but still losing, unfortunately they did it for 10 games before they really started a streak. This team has been so hot and cold all year long, and they can win any game when they set their minds to it.....I seriously wonder if its a motivational problem at times. I actually am expecting the Oil to start to streak....and I did notice they have 2 games in hand on the Canucks but its still nauseating to see the Canucks go on a 7 game winning streak, of which I believe 4 or 5 were in OT or a shootout....


This post reminded me of a good quote for the Oil:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/vizual/imageHA9.jpg
"You put your mind to it, you can accomplish ANYTHING."
-George Mcfly from Back to the Future

If this team plays like they've been playing lately, but STOPS with the friggin turnovers in their own end and the neutral zone, they should get the W tonight.


Any Oilers post with a Back to the Future reference is golden!

I'm not giving up on this team yet. They should have won that game on Thursday and played well on Friday. Now with most of the guys healthy (except for Schmeebs) I think they are ready to hit their stride. I really liked the way Hejda and Roy played on Friday (except for his OT gaffe of course) and I hope the Czech line can keep gelling. Time for a winning streak, can't let these teams get too far in front.

Go Oil!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326229 is a reply to message #326173 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 12:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OilersR4Real  is currently offline OilersR4Real
Messages: 119
Registered: December 2006
Location: Calgary

No Cups

BigDog wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 09:22

Not full blown panic mode 'YET' Bomb, but with a couple more poor showings from the Oilers we should be.

And I must say that I don't have the most confidence in this group to turn things around. I hope they can, but they really seem to be lacking in something I can't put my finger on. Im not sure that a good dman is enough to pull them out of this funk their in.

Anyone else feel this way? confused2



Agreed...add in that upcoming 7 game road trip next month out east and the fact that we end the season on a 6 gamer...well it is time to start the trading and get us some D help...we can sign Smitty after Philly gives us their only good d man...



Stupid Fat Hobbit!

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326220 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 12:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
e-townoilerfan  is currently offline e-townoilerfan
Messages: 33
Registered: December 2006

No Cups

I'm desperatly hoping for a win tonight thats all. so i can actually enjoy watching them play for once.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326347 is a reply to message #326220 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 20:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chiefbender  is currently offline chiefbender
Messages: 766
Registered: December 2006
Location: Illinois

No Cups

e-townoilerfan wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 13:10

I'm desperatly hoping for a win tonight thats all. so i can actually enjoy watching them play for once.

I just hope they show up and compete. I'm tired of the lack of energy for huge portions of the game. Start strong and roll it every shift, everybody hit someone, force the puck, keep it simple and work hard.



"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."

- Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326351 is a reply to message #326347 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 20:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TheGreatOne  is currently offline TheGreatOne
Messages: 67
Registered: December 2005

No Cups

Raff man just walked by Gene and is dressed.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326442 is a reply to message #326351 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 23:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
e-townoilerfan  is currently offline e-townoilerfan
Messages: 33
Registered: December 2006

No Cups

Roy has had a solid game. Like i'm very impressed. Roli is playing like he was in the begining of the year. Defense is actually getting the puck out of the zone. So far good game. Lets see what happens in overtime.

[Updated on: Mon, 08 January 2007 23:11]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326226 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oil Tycoon  is currently offline Oil Tycoon
Messages: 765
Registered: March 2006
Location: St.Catharines, Ontario

No Cups

Yoda says, "Difficult to see the future is." I share those sentiments when it comes to tonight's game. I could see them win, I could just as easily see them lose. However, if they play the way they did against Vancouver Friday night, they just might sneek out with 2 points. If they do win, MacT. should take the players down to Tijuana for a little "fiesta"! mexican


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326243 is a reply to message #326226 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 13:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Lee Ovaltine  is currently offline Lee Ovaltine
Messages: 48
Registered: September 2002
Location: Crystal Beach, ON

No Cups

Oil Tycoon wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 14:20

If they do win, MacT. should take the players down to Tijuana for a little "fiesta"! mexican


You mean for a donkey show? THat might add some incentive for a winning streak.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326253 is a reply to message #326243 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 13:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OldGreyMonkey  is currently offline OldGreyMonkey
Messages: 862
Registered: July 2005
Location: South of Edmonton

No Cups

Lee Ovaltine wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 13:27

Oil Tycoon wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 14:20

If they do win, MacT. should take the players down to Tijuana for a little "fiesta"! mexican


You mean for a donkey show? THat might add some incentive for a winning streak.



You mean they didn't get enough of those watching game tapes the last month?



Happy to announce a permanent Oilfan vacation.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326227 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Htown  is currently offline Htown
Messages: 25
Registered: August 2005

No Cups

You know how it is with the Oiler's at times, when the going get's tough they choke. But feel good in the fact the last 10 games they'll will finally start finding their form and score goals and play defence like madmen. Hopefully it won't be too late by then.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326268 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 14:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 8712
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

6 Cups

Although Mathieu Roy played a solid game on Friday, will his HUGE gaf in overtime keep him out of tonights game?

Assuming Smidly is still injured.

Thoughts.

[Updated on: Mon, 08 January 2007 14:40]


#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326280 is a reply to message #326268 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 15:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
halfafrog  is currently offline halfafrog
Messages: 1023
Registered: March 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ

1 Cup

I say put him (Roy) back in cuz i can guarantee you he won't make that mistake twice, he seemed pretty solid other than that. Besides I'm convinced someone in Vancouver sold their soul for this 7 game winning streak (explains all the trees down in Stanley Park too). I'm not sure we have a lot of options on D do we? I mean other than pray a lot.




So this is what hope feels like?

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326283 is a reply to message #326280 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 15:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HBomb  is currently offline HBomb
Messages: 1554
Registered: March 2001

1 Cup

halfafrog wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 15:22

I say put him (Roy) back in cuz i can guarantee you he won't make that mistake twice, he seemed pretty solid other than that. Besides I'm convinced someone in Vancouver sold their soul for this 7 game winning streak (explains all the trees down in Stanley Park too). I'm not sure we have a lot of options on D do we? I mean other than pray a lot.




If Tjarnqvist gets healthy (don't know what his status is), I'd have to think he'd draw back in, but until then, Roy stays in the lineup and MacT leans heavily on his "top four" (I use that term loosely) of Smith/Staios/Greene/Hejda.

Yuck. I just threw up in my mouth a little typing that last sentence...



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326290 is a reply to message #326283 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 15:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Superintendent  is currently offline Superintendent
Messages: 1060
Registered: March 2006
Location: City of Champions

1 Cup


Did I miss some news (very well could have...been one of those days). Sportsnet is saying Tjarn is in and Greene is out. What happened to Greene?

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20070108_ 140150_6364



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326294 is a reply to message #326290 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 15:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HBomb  is currently offline HBomb
Messages: 1554
Registered: March 2001

1 Cup

Superintendent wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 15:40


Did I miss some news (very well could have...been one of those days). Sportsnet is saying Tjarn is in and Greene is out. What happened to Greene?

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20070108_ 140150_6364



Greene's play has slipped recently, so a spot in the pressbox for a game might not be a bad thing, and isn't that surprising, really.

But to sit while Roy is in? Can't say I agree with that.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326297 is a reply to message #326290 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 15:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OldGreyMonkey  is currently offline OldGreyMonkey
Messages: 862
Registered: July 2005
Location: South of Edmonton

No Cups

Superintendent wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 15:40


Did I miss some news (very well could have...been one of those days). Sportsnet is saying Tjarn is in and Greene is out. What happened to Greene?

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20070108_ 140150_6364



If they intend to play either of MAB or Roy over Greene & the kid is actually healthy (& over the nose/sinus problems), then it is a complete mystery to me what the hell MacT is thinking.
I'm kinda wary of trusting Sportsnet's website, though. We do know that Ladislav Smid is out, but as far as I know, Daniel Tjarnqvist & his hip pointer are still listed as "questionable"...



Happy to announce a permanent Oilfan vacation.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: [message #326314 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 17:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Brentz0r  is currently offline Brentz0r
Messages: 3
Registered: October 2006
Location: edmonton

No Cups

hey, we have this one in the bag... i've been out of town and working lots lately and i haven't been wearing my chopper jersey at all on game days... we started losing when i stopped wearing the jersey... i am on vacation and i have it on now...
5-2 oilers.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326316 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 17:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mikeisthird  is currently offline mikeisthird
Messages: 310
Registered: November 2006
Location: Stony Plain

No Cups

Gene Principe on the TEAM said that Tjarnquist will play tonight, Matt Greene won't (to sit in the box and look at what's going on), Mathieu Roy stays with Bergeron, and Roloson in net.

Earlier in the show (I didn't catch why) they said something about Torres being out as well.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326324 is a reply to message #326316 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 18:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Slim Jim Phantom Call  is currently offline Slim Jim Phantom Call
Messages: 1402
Registered: May 2002
Location: E-Ville

1 Cup

Has anyone else heard this bit about Torres being scratched tonight?

Soon as I read that, I see along the ticker on TSN that Boston has recalled a D & G, while only sending down a G. By my count, the Bruins now have 8 D on their active roster.

Now Im not saying anything, but there HAVE been Stuart for Torres rumours out there...



In fairness to Hall, I've wanted to throw a waterbottle at Eakins all season.
~nullterm 03/22/2014

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326326 is a reply to message #326324 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 18:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2453
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

The plot thickens.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326328 is a reply to message #326326 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 18:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stangconv  is currently offline stangconv
Messages: 83
Registered: May 2006

No Cups

Dun dun duh....


http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/5363/flamesfansws2.png

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326329 is a reply to message #326324 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 18:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dr. Oil  is currently offline Dr. Oil
Messages: 1254
Registered: June 2003
Location: BC

1 Cup

nik- wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 17:15

Has anyone else heard this bit about Torres being scratched tonight?

Soon as I read that, I see along the ticker on TSN that Boston has recalled a D & G, while only sending down a G. By my count, the Bruins now have 8 D on their active roster.

Now Im not saying anything, but there HAVE been Stuart for Torres rumours out there...


I would hate that trade. This organization will regret the trading of Torres, unless a true difference maker comes back our way. Stuart is NOT one of those.

I really hope when it's time to trade a forward for a D-man, Raffi is not the payment.

As for tonight, I expect a big night from a few players: Horc, Winch, Loops, and Smytty. 5-3 Oilers... Roli will continue to look shaky and MacT will continue to snub Jussi.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326340 is a reply to message #326329 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 19:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Superintendent  is currently offline Superintendent
Messages: 1060
Registered: March 2006
Location: City of Champions

1 Cup

Dr. Oil wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 18:42


I would hate that trade. This organization will regret the trading of Torres, unless a true difference maker comes back our way. Stuart is NOT one of those.



Although I agree with you re: value of Torres...You do have to give something to get something and he is one of our more valuable commodities. A guy like him and his <$1million/RFA-status will fetch a lot more than Horcoff, Lupul, and other guys.

Plus...although we would miss Torres, if he fetches us a blueliner that can make a tape-to-tape outlet pass and QB the PP, we would be ahead at the end of the day.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326343 is a reply to message #326329 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 19:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JRock71  is currently offline JRock71
Messages: 447
Registered: November 2003
Location: Spruce Grove, AB

No Cups

Dr. Oil wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 18:42

nik- wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 17:15

Has anyone else heard this bit about Torres being scratched tonight?

Soon as I read that, I see along the ticker on TSN that Boston has recalled a D & G, while only sending down a G. By my count, the Bruins now have 8 D on their active roster.

Now Im not saying anything, but there HAVE been Stuart for Torres rumours out there...


I would hate that trade. This organization will regret the trading of Torres, unless a true difference maker comes back our way. Stuart is NOT one of those.

I really hope when it's time to trade a forward for a D-man, Raffi is not the payment.




I 100% agree with you on that. If I were some people, I wouldn't get so hyped up, according to hfboard, Brad Stuart and his wife are expecting a child any day so that is why the emergency call up.



" Right, people you have to tell me these things, okay? I've been frozen for thirty years, okay? Throw me a frickin' bone here! I'm the boss! Need the info.
" - Dr. Evil

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326344 is a reply to message #326343 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 20:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stangconv  is currently offline stangconv
Messages: 83
Registered: May 2006

No Cups

http://www.boston.com/sports/hockey/bruins/extras/bruins_blo g/


Stuart having a baby!



http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/5363/flamesfansws2.png

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326334 is a reply to message #326316 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 19:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Piercimo  is currently offline Piercimo
Messages: 6
Registered: January 2006
Location: medicine hat

No Cups

guywhodoesstuff wrote on Mon, 08 January 2007 17:19

Gene Principe on the TEAM said that Tjarnquist will play tonight, Matt Greene won't (to sit in the box and look at what's going on), Mathieu Roy stays with Bergeron, and Roloson in net.

Earlier in the show (I didn't catch why) they said something about Torres being out as well.






interesting........very interesting rtft get er done Lowe deadhorse



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Pregame: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) [message #326451 is a reply to message #326152 ]
Mon, 08 January 2007 23:09 Go to previous message
e-townoilerfan  is currently offline e-townoilerfan
Messages: 33
Registered: December 2006

No Cups

Hedja!!!!! I love this guy haha.(right now i do)


Send a private message to this user  

 
Previous Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42)
Next Topic: Review: Edmonton @ Vancouver (Game #41)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca