|
Adam Messages: 6927
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
6 Cups
|
|
RDOilerfan wrote on Thu, 20 December 2018 11:07 |
Goose wrote on Thu, 20 December 2018 10:55 |
RDOilerfan wrote on Thu, 20 December 2018 09:20 |
WhoreableGuy wrote on Thu, 20 December 2018 10:11 |
RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 19 December 2018 16:16 | Seeing lots of tweets about last nights game and the stats guys complaining. A reason why I sometimes have a hard time buying into the stats community and some of the stuff they put out. Woodguy- big time Oilers stats guy who is very vocal - tweeting about how the Oilers need to take Chiasson off the top line because they aren't scoring enough.
McDavid is on a 118 pt pace.
Leon is on a 98 pt pace.
Chiasson has 15 goals so may end up with mid 20's in goals which is good, top line production from the 3rd guy on the line.
#1, who else is there.
#2, How much more can they seriously think they can score? 2 guys with close too or over 100 pts and the 3rd guy with mid 20's in goals isn't enough?
|
I don't see why Rattie shouldn't get a few games back on the top line like Chaisson. The guy knows how to play with McDavid, I'm just not sure that Hitch would He's not useful on the bottom 6, Chiasson was at least still scoring not playing with McDavid. I think it would balance the lines more.
|
I agree. That is why when I saw Woodguy post that Chiasson shouldn't be on the top line, I didn't get it. There will be 2 guys at or well past 100 pts and the 3rd wheel on the line probably scoring mid 20's in goals and that isn't enough?
|
I don't want to speak for Woodguy, but that's not exactly what he said.
I'm assuming that this is the tweet you were referencing:
Quote: | @Woodguy55: Hitch has to change out Chiasson on the top line. The only reason their GF% hasn't tanked is due to .950 goaltending behind them. The rest of the results are really bad when you consider its McDavid and Drai out there:
|
The usual caveat about small sample sizes and such, but those underlying numbers aren't good. His point isn't specifically that they aren't scoring enough, but that without a .950 save percentage behind them, they would likely be giving up more goals than they are scoring, which isn't okay.
https://twitter.com/Woodguy55/status/1075419767169642497
And later on in the thread, he posted this:
Quote: | @Woodguy55: 3.59 with Chiasson and 4.59 w/o him.
|
Those are GF/60 rates, so they are actually scoring less with Chiasson than without him. I haven't dug into the numbers at all, so there may be some usage things going on there. And that 4.59 number will include some time with RNH, so it may make more sense to spread out the scoring more.
https://twitter.com/Woodguy55/status/1075421138593824769
But it's the top numbers that are more concerning. It doesn't matter how much that line is scoring if they're on the ice for more goals against than they score, this team is not going to make up that difference from the bottom 12.
|
Well in my opinion, that's the fault of McDavid and Leon, not Chiasson. You see McDavid and Leon cheating for offense all the time. McDavid is the best, fastest player in the NHL by a lot and how many times do we see McDavid's guy going free with McDavid cruising behind? In all seriousness, what player can't McDavid keep up with and out skill to steal a puck from? So he should be able to be in the hip pocket of every player he lines up against but he's not.
I feel dirty to say anything remotely negative about McDavid but he's the key to that line.
|
I actually don't think that line has looked that effective recently. They haven't been dominating like they were earlier in the year. It could be Chiasson, it could be fatigue from over-playing those guys, but something likely has to change.
In this morning's practice, it appears that it's Chiasson that Hitchcock elected to change:
Quote: | Bob Stauffer
@Bob_Stauffer
RNH-McDavid-Puljujarvi
Rieder-Draisaitl-Chiasson
Caggiula-Brodziak-Kassian
Lucic-Khaira (susp)-Rattie
Spooner likely in for Khaira, Zykov
|
Also - Lucic practicing on the fourth line...If he skates with Rattie and Spooner, he may set a new low in ice time next game. Does he even get 10 minutes?
"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky
|
|
|
|
Review:
St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: OilFans on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:30 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:44 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:52 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Magnum on Wed, 19 December 2018 12:12 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Wed, 19 December 2018 13:36 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Wed, 19 December 2018 01:19 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Mike on Wed, 19 December 2018 05:59 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:39 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: PlusOne on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:42 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:45 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:39 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: K.McC#24 on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:42 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:05 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:37 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:38 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:42 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:48 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:51 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:54 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: overdue on Wed, 19 December 2018 09:52 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: shoop on Wed, 19 December 2018 16:11 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 19 December 2018 00:06 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Wed, 19 December 2018 12:30 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 18 December 2018 21:59 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 18 December 2018 22:36 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: overdue on Wed, 19 December 2018 16:28 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Goose on Thu, 20 December 2018 10:55 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Thu, 20 December 2018 11:15 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: overdue on Thu, 20 December 2018 15:55 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Thu, 20 December 2018 12:42 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Thu, 20 December 2018 12:57 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Thu, 20 December 2018 14:50 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Thu, 20 December 2018 15:28 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Kr55 on Thu, 20 December 2018 18:38 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: g2k on Thu, 20 December 2018 19:42 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Thu, 20 December 2018 21:03 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: overdue on Thu, 20 December 2018 16:02 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Thu, 20 December 2018 16:25 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Xombie on Thu, 20 December 2018 20:17 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #35) |
By: Adam on Thu, 20 December 2018 21:07 |