 bigEfromGP
Messages: 813
Registered: July 2006
Location: GP, AB
No Cups
|
|
| Kr55 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 |
| nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.
|
Gonna take a bet that the PP will be fine. It was tops in the league before Barrie got here. Always scored fine even when Nurse had to fill in. Maybe little growing pain for Bouch, but we really don't ask that much of the D for the PP. Just to not screw up and lose the puck. Honestly we should have been using him there more already to prepare for Barrie inevitably leaving.
|
I agree completely. The greatest PP is not going to all of sudden become useless because Tyson Barrie isn't on it.
| CrusaderPi wrote on Fri, 09 October 2020 13:17 |
| CrudeRemarks wrote on Fri, 09 October 2020 13:00 |
The president thinks he has the ideal male body.
|
It's hard to disagree that he has the ideal male body.
|
|
|
|
|
Ekholm trade |
By: Adrean on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:42 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Skoobz on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:50 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: JPro on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:52 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 10:51 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 13:15 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 15:32 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 17:34 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:11 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Red Rage on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:09 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:35 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Rutuu on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:03 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:38 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:42 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: PlusOne on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:55 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:06 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Wed, 01 March 2023 18:37 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 21:12 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Thu, 02 March 2023 00:44 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 17 April 2023 13:39 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
