|
Kr55 Messages: 9889
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton
6 Cups
|
|
I really don't think we need to panic about the PP. Barrie can look flashy darting side to side, like an amazing flopping around Mike Smith save that other goalies would have made look boring, but the PP has been run 95% by 3 players for years now. The D just needs to exist for the most part and not make dumb plays. Even Nurse did fine there when needed
From @Woodguy55
The PP success lives and dies by McDrai being on their game, and that's basically it. We had a terrible run of PP suck last year, but Barrie didn't help, and he was taken off for other guys hoping it would help for a while while we waited for McDrai to get it together again. The D rotation didn't help much, no one there really mattered, until the big 3 figured things out again.
If by some miracle Bouch can finally add a bomb shot to the PP that we haven't had forever, bonus. But all he really has to do is be able to pass to open guys on either side of him and take obvious shot opportunities. Nuge and McDrai handle the rest.
[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 17:50]
"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013
"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015
5 x $5,000,000
|
|
|
|
Ekholm trade |
By: Adrean on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:42 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Skoobz on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:50 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: JPro on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:52 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 10:51 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 13:15 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 15:32 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 17:34 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:11 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Red Rage on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:09 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:35 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Rutuu on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:03 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:38 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:42 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: PlusOne on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:55 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:06 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Wed, 01 March 2023 18:37 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 21:12 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Thu, 02 March 2023 00:44 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 17 April 2023 13:39 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|