|
Skookum Jim Messages: 3992
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
3 Cups
|
|
Thinking about Barrie.. big loss. but might have been a good move to use Barrie in a trade now.. he's having a good season statistically .. and probably at peak market value.. probably would have been one of the top options to trade to lower team cap this summer anyway.. could be good timing.. Receiving a true No.1 defensive D-man who can skate and move the puck.. plus he's 6'-4" and a cycle-killer.
My view on Schaeffer prior to this trade was he could go either way as a prospect.. his success in the NHL is unknown.. he had some periods of no production this year.. in a league where he is larger than most of his peers.. or.. he could turn into the next Tom Wilson.. but either way he was not likely useable on the roster for up to 2 years plus..
Hopefully the 1st this year will be low if this team has any success in the playoffs..
[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 17:22]
McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,
|
|
|
|
Ekholm trade |
By: Adrean on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:42 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Skoobz on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:50 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: JPro on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:52 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 10:51 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 13:15 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 15:32 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 17:34 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:11 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Red Rage on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:09 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:35 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Rutuu on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:03 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:38 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:42 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: PlusOne on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:55 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:06 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Wed, 01 March 2023 18:37 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 21:12 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Thu, 02 March 2023 00:44 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 17 April 2023 13:39 |
Re: Ekholm trade |
|