 |
 Skookum Jim
Messages: 3990
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
3 Cups
|
|
| kungpaobenji27 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:18 |
Bouchard's lateral skating isn't what it needs to be on the PP....maybe even less effective than Klefbom. At this rate, I'd rather see Nuge quarterbacking the PP from the blue line than having Bouchard as the main facilitator from the back end (though still need him for his shot out there)
|
I agree about Bouchard.. his deficiency for PP QB is his lack of lateral mobility along the blueline.. Barrie was very mobile and positionally savvy on the PP.
I think Ekholm now becomes our best Defenseman.. (emphasis on defence)
[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 16:40]
McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,
|
|
|
|
Ekholm trade |
By: Adrean on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:42 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Skoobz on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:50 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: JPro on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:52 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 10:51 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 13:15 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 15:32 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 17:34 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:11 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Red Rage on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:09 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:35 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Rutuu on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:03 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:38 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:42 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: PlusOne on Tue, 28 February 2023 18:55 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Adam on Thu, 02 March 2023 23:06 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: oilfan94 on Wed, 01 March 2023 18:37 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: nullterm on Wed, 01 March 2023 21:12 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 01 March 2023 22:15 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: smyth260 on Thu, 02 March 2023 00:44 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 17 April 2023 13:39 |
|
Re: Ekholm trade |
|
