OilFans.com :: Fan Forum: Oilers => Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)

Guest

This day on May 5
Acquired: John Blum (1981)

Happy Birthday To: BitterEnd, limecorrado, Bluefire, oilstained, Oilstained4Life, 35 for HOF

OILERS INFO OILFANS
Sunday, May 5, 2024 3:05 PM MT

F.A.Q.

Members

Home

Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)

Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5) [message #793489 is a reply to message #793479 ]	Mon, 25 October 2021 18:19

Kr55
Messages: 9705
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Adam wrote on Mon, 25 October 2021 13:40

Mike wrote on Mon, 25 October 2021 13:28

Goose wrote on Mon, 25 October 2021 16:09

RDOilerfan wrote on Mon, 25 October 2021 08:21

Here is a question for you. If before last years season someone came to you and said, in the 21-22 Bouchard to start the year looking like a legit stud, at worse top 3, right shot dman but the trade off is they did what they did with him last year. In doing that, the Oilers were a good team last year, made the playoffs but lost out no because the defense was bad, it was because they couldn't score. Would you take that? I sure would.

I don't know if how they handled Bouchard last year was completely right but I do know it sure didn't hurt him. I do know that by all accounts whatever they did last year, helped him improve. I don't know if he would have just improved anyway, I doubt it but he could have. I don't know if he played more, he'd be that much better. He's been more than I ever could have expected so I don't know how he could me much better but maybe he could. All I know is, he was drafted by the Oilers, they slow played the crap out of him, maybe more than I personally would have liked but he looks fantastic, so far everything I had hoped he would be when he was drafted so I am having a hard time being upset with how the Oilers handled him at all if this is the end results.

No, I wouldn't take that at all. It was dumb when they did it and it's still dumb now.

The other thing that we haven't talked about is the management perspective. Maybe if they had played him more, Holland would have realized that Bouchard was ready for a bigger role (let's not forget, he started the season on the 3rd pairing, so obviously even his own coaches and GM didn't know how good he was). And then maybe when Larsson walked, maybe Holland doesn't panic and think he needs to trade Bear because he HAS to re-sign Barrie to play with Nurse because he doesn't think (incorrectly imo) that Bear is up to the task.

Yeah:

Nurse/Bouchard
Keith/Bear

looks WAYYYY better than

Nurse/Barrie
Keith/Ceci

But there was no way to know that going into this year because, well we didn't get to see Bouchard, even when there was absolutely nothing left to gain or lose. It was a management miscue, regardless how well Bouchard plays this year.

The crazy thing is that we're paying Ceci $3.25MM, while Bear would just have been $2MM this year. Not only did we shoot ourselves in the foot, but we wasted over $1MM of cap space at the same time.

If you don't sign Barrie, and instead get a third pairing right shot D-man, then we're even better off cap-wise and even with the unforced error on Keith, we have $3-4MM that could have gone towards goaltending.

I may actually trust Ceci out there more than Barrie. In my mind the argument is more Barrie vs Bear than Ceci vs Bear.

Bear has always put up spectacular results playing weaker comp on a 3rd pair. I don't actually trust Barrie much as a 3rd pair guy. I also think Nurse looks just as good as Barrie on the PP, and Bouch will likely be even better.

Bear/Ceci/Bouch would have been fine with me on the right side. I'm saying this with the benefit of seeing Ceci more in our group. From what I've seen he actually plays a lot like Larsson. Maybe less nasty, but with better wheels. Larsson had to keep adding more nasty though because his wheels are kinda busted. And of course the benefit of seeing Bouch actually play. That's none of our fault though not knowing what he would bring yet. I don't give a pass to Holland or Tippett though for having no clue, they had all the time in the world last year.

[Updated on: Mon, 25 October 2021 18:24]

"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Report message to a moderator

Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: OilFans on Fri, 22 October 2021 22:30
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: CrusaderPi on Fri, 22 October 2021 22:46
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Oscargasm on Fri, 22 October 2021 22:47
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: watchman on Fri, 22 October 2021 22:50
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Oscargasm on Fri, 22 October 2021 22:52
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: inverno76 on Sat, 23 October 2021 07:21
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: kungpaobenji27 on Sat, 23 October 2021 13:31
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Kr55 on Fri, 22 October 2021 22:48
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Adam on Fri, 22 October 2021 22:54
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Leia on Fri, 22 October 2021 23:15
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: inverno76 on Fri, 22 October 2021 23:23
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Mike on Sat, 23 October 2021 06:46
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: K.McC#24 on Sat, 23 October 2021 11:30
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: RDOilerfan on Mon, 25 October 2021 09:21
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Adam on Mon, 25 October 2021 10:22
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: CrusaderPi on Mon, 25 October 2021 11:20
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Goose on Mon, 25 October 2021 13:09
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Mike on Mon, 25 October 2021 13:28
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Adam on Mon, 25 October 2021 13:40
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: GabbyDugan on Mon, 25 October 2021 14:28
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Mike on Mon, 25 October 2021 14:42
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Adam on Mon, 25 October 2021 14:45
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Kr55 on Mon, 25 October 2021 15:37
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: CrudeRemarks on Mon, 25 October 2021 16:48
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Adam on Mon, 25 October 2021 17:15
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Kr55 on Mon, 25 October 2021 18:19
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: oilfan94 on Mon, 25 October 2021 18:46
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Kr55 on Mon, 25 October 2021 18:53
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Goose on Tue, 26 October 2021 13:28
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Adam on Tue, 26 October 2021 16:01
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Mike on Tue, 26 October 2021 17:29
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Skoobz on Sat, 23 October 2021 10:22
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: K.McC#24 on Sat, 23 October 2021 11:36
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: benv on Sat, 23 October 2021 11:53
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Skookum Jim on Sat, 23 October 2021 14:15
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Mike on Mon, 25 October 2021 07:19
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Rocksteady on Mon, 25 October 2021 16:10
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Dragon_Matt on Tue, 26 October 2021 10:30
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: CrudeRemarks on Tue, 26 October 2021 11:37
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Vegas (Game #5)	By: Mike on Tue, 26 October 2021 12:26

Previous Topic: Pregame: Philadelphia @ Edmonton (Game #6)
Next Topic: Puljujarvi signed to a two-year contract
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale

Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement

Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca