|
Adam Messages: 6833
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
6 Cups
|
|
CrudeRemarks wrote on Thu, 25 March 2021 09:37 |
benv wrote on Wed, 24 March 2021 17:38 |
Adam wrote on Wed, 24 March 2021 17:30 |
RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 24 March 2021 16:45 | I think he will be the teams back up for next year. At 785k and given overall, his numbers look pretty decent, I don't think you can get a back up for any cheaper than that. He's making barely above league minimum. I wonder if they protect him in expansion, then expose Koskinen.
|
Seattle is not going to take Koskinen unless we coax them to. Ditto for Neal, ditto for Kris Russell. They won’t take one of our crappy players with bad contracts out of the goodness of their hearts.
|
Is there anyway the Oilers can waive their protection of a goalie, and use it to protect an extra d-man? That would obviously be ideal, but I'm guessing it's not allowed.
|
I suppose this could kind of work if you pay Seattle in picks or prospects but that's not really what you mean.
Personally I'd gauge their interest in taking a pick back in exchange for Kassian, Neal, Russell or Koski (long shot though on him since he offers very little benefit).
|
I don't believe there's a way to protect an extra player, other than with a trade to the Kraken to get them to stay away from someone who's technically exposed. You need to protect one goalie. The Oilers could throw away protection by guarding UFA-to-be Mike Smith instead, but they can't use the spot on someone more valuable.
If I'm giving up something to the Kraken to take someone, I'm pushing hard for them to take James Neal. He's not a regular everyday player already and he's got two more years. The buyout is horrific at this point as we'd be paying him for the next 4 years. Koskinen's is ugly two but half as long and not as much. If the option is Stalock or Koskinen as the back-up and the team feels it's even close to a wash, it may make sense to buy him out, as the buyout plus Stalock still provides savings for the team on their back-up role.
"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky
|
|
|
|
Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Daftmonk on Mon, 01 March 2021 10:13 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Adam on Mon, 01 March 2021 11:04 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: NetBOG on Mon, 01 March 2021 11:17 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Adam on Mon, 01 March 2021 13:16 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Adam on Mon, 01 March 2021 13:24 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 01 March 2021 13:49 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Hibernia on Tue, 02 March 2021 06:20 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Adam on Tue, 02 March 2021 10:13 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: nullterm on Wed, 24 March 2021 14:58 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Adam on Wed, 24 March 2021 17:30 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: NetBOG on Wed, 24 March 2021 17:47 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: benv on Wed, 24 March 2021 17:38 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Adam on Thu, 25 March 2021 11:19 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Skoobz on Thu, 25 March 2021 12:50 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Kr55 on Wed, 24 March 2021 17:05 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Adam on Fri, 14 January 2022 14:39 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
|
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: NetBOG on Fri, 14 January 2022 16:27 |
Re: Oilers Claim G Stalock off waivers |
By: Kr55 on Fri, 14 January 2022 16:51 |