 RDOilerfan
Messages: 3705
Registered: January 2016
3 Cups
|
|
| Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 02 July 2019 10:28 |
| RDOilerfan wrote on Tue, 02 July 2019 10:25 |
| Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 02 July 2019 10:19 |
I still thought it was too much money for Chiasson. For a guy that had a career year and a track history of less than 20 goals per season you could of had him 1.5AAV for 2 instead of 2.15. However in the end it's fine when you're talking about a few hundred thousand quid.
*for the record I have no idea what a quid is, except that it's used in saying in the same vein as dollars. Not sure the denomination of quid either.. but I juxtaposed the relationship.
✔ Word of the day.
✔ Used a word not used used very much in North America.
✔ Everyone should be proud of me.
|
If you look at the market and how much money and term bottom 6 guys were getting, I thought the Chiasson contract was pretty decent.
|
A lot of people have said this to me. I'm probably in the minority but I remain steadfast saying he is paid too much. It's all just an opinion really, right or wrong. I hope Chiasson proves me wrong.
|
I would have like Chiasson to get 1.5 mill, I just don't know how. Tanev got 3.5 mill on a 6 yr deal. What's the difference between the 2? I think Tanev is a bit faster. Even Hathaway got 4 years at 1.5 mill. I was shocked at what 3rd and 4th liners were getting. I thought those days were over.
|
|
|
|
