 |
 Oscargasm
Messages: 5699
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG
5 Cups
|
|
| bigEfromGP wrote on Wed, 20 February 2019 16:25 |
| Adam wrote on Wed, 20 February 2019 14:40 |
| bigEfromGP wrote on Wed, 20 February 2019 14:12 |
| Mullet wrote on Wed, 20 February 2019 13:22 |
I think that they should play stolarz so he doesn't become a UFA. If he doesn't get 10 more games he's out. Oilers need to give up on playoffs. Even yesterday they were talking about knowing in the next 3 games. So stuck on stupid.
|
Who cares if he becomes UFA?
|
Well, trading Talbot becomes pretty meaningless if he does...
Although if they didn't trade Talbot, they couldn't have unburied Spooner, so they wouldn't have been able to acquire Sam Gagner, so maybe people should say it was Talbot for Stolarz, Sekera and Gagner - and if so, then maybe it was all worth it!
I will say, if they were to go on a run and then Koskinen gets hurt or falls flat, then that Talbot trade will look really bad...especially if they really have no plans at all for Stolarz.
|
Talbot was gone at end of the season. Maybe one could argue that the Oilers should/could have gotten more for him (which I don't think is true, given his performance), but that's a different argument altogether.
So again, I ask who cares if Stolarz goes UFA? If he's the backup the Oilers want, he's still going to be less than $1.5 million (on the high end). Play him as many games as necessary to see how he performs as a backup this season but outside of that there is no reason to play him.
|
I full heartedly agree on this.
Talbot wasn’t going to be back. Oilers aren’t making the playoffs (unless a miracle occurs and we all head to PlusOne’s place in Regina for an OPP or OWS (whatever we wanna call it).
They cleared a good amount of cap for this season allowing an easy move for getting Sek up while bringing in a backup that is young in goalie terms, cheap and someone they could resign cheap, even if he doesn’t get the 10 games in.
Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty
|
|
|
|
Review:
Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: OilFans on Tue, 19 February 2019 21:30 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: g2k on Tue, 19 February 2019 21:48 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: NetBOG on Tue, 19 February 2019 22:00 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 19 February 2019 22:07 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: overdue on Tue, 19 February 2019 22:02 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: PlusOne on Wed, 20 February 2019 07:39 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: PlusOne on Wed, 20 February 2019 08:50 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Adam on Wed, 20 February 2019 09:18 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 20 February 2019 14:54 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Adam on Wed, 20 February 2019 15:02 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: overdue on Wed, 20 February 2019 15:36 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 20 February 2019 14:47 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Mullet on Wed, 20 February 2019 13:22 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Adam on Wed, 20 February 2019 14:40 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Adam on Wed, 20 February 2019 15:35 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Mullet on Wed, 20 February 2019 19:18 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Adam on Wed, 20 February 2019 22:28 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: overdue on Wed, 20 February 2019 15:40 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Adam on Wed, 20 February 2019 17:15 |
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
|
|
Re: Review: Arizona @ Edmonton (Game #59) |
By: Mullet on Wed, 20 February 2019 19:21 |
