This day on May 4
None

Happy Birthday To: Devan Dubnyk, Copperhead, hornblower, evaoilplc

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1)Pages (3): [ «  <  1  2  3  >  »]
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808084 is a reply to message #808083 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2877
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Adam wrote on Tue, 31 May 2022 23:50

Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 31 May 2022 23:37

Oh and just to be clear.. Ron McLean is an absolute embarrassment, his extended intermission "big-screen explanation" trying to confuse the audience into believing that the off-side goal was in fact not actually off-side was pathetic. He didn't even understand the drivel that was coming out of his own mouth. One of the most embarrassing displays of NHL bootlicking by media I've ever seen.

Can't believe that ass-hat claims to be a referee.

Makar had POSSESSION of the puck the entire time he crossed the blue line.. the puck NEVER left the control of his stick.. he did not "shoot" it in over the line and then "picked it up" on the other side of the blue line..

End. Of. Discussion.

You don't lose "possession" if the puck does not continually touch the stick.. if you are "stickhandling" it never does.. its in fact the exact definition of stick "handling".. what defines "possession" is "control of the puck".. and Makar had control the entire time. Easy decision.

NO GOAL

The Avs 3rd goal (off-side), 4th goal (PPG from challenging the NHL's incompetence/bias) .. and the 8th goal (EN) were all the result of the NHL's decision to re-write the NHL rule book as they conducted the review..

Oilers won 6-5


Game 2, Oilers need to tighten up in their own end (they did the last half of the game).. and then just keep pumping pucks past Kuemper.. icon_nod


Well, I'll disagree slightly. We didn't win, even if that's clearly a major turning point. It's impossible to know how the game plays out without that call.

I thought Woodcroft did a good job explaining it after the game. Makar carries the puck across the line and never makes any attempt to hold up or avoid playing the puck. As Jay says, "it's not like he stops and lifts his stick for a second, he doesn't even know his guy is off-side." To me, that's possession. The NHL blows down the play on possession on delayed off-sides and penalty kills regularly where the guy hasn't yet touched the puck. Here they're clinging to a fraction of a second, if you allow that he didn't still have the puck touching his stick when it fully crossed the blueline, which is controversial in its own right.

If this is really the rule, then undoubtedly refs get it wrong all the time when players are tagging up, as they need to see whether the puck actually touched the stick on his stickhandling or was between taps whenever they are making that call. That's just not consistent with the way the game is officiated.

Just a brutal call. Maybe that's the hockey gods coming back on us after the Calgary disallowed goal (which to me was a 50/50 play), although they still owe us for the McDavid "goalie interference" one a couple games earlier then.


There is no way a linesman saw all of the slow-mo replays in real time. If he isn't completely incompetant, the play is blown dead on the ice and none of this happens.

Unfortunately either Brad Kovachik (#71) or Devin Berg (#87) couldn't do the simplest part of their job right. He was a foot inside the zone!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808085 is a reply to message #808084 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 00:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

NetBOG wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 00:00

Adam wrote on Tue, 31 May 2022 23:50

Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 31 May 2022 23:37

Oh and just to be clear.. Ron McLean is an absolute embarrassment, his extended intermission "big-screen explanation" trying to confuse the audience into believing that the off-side goal was in fact not actually off-side was pathetic. He didn't even understand the drivel that was coming out of his own mouth. One of the most embarrassing displays of NHL bootlicking by media I've ever seen.

Can't believe that ass-hat claims to be a referee.

Makar had POSSESSION of the puck the entire time he crossed the blue line.. the puck NEVER left the control of his stick.. he did not "shoot" it in over the line and then "picked it up" on the other side of the blue line..

End. Of. Discussion.

You don't lose "possession" if the puck does not continually touch the stick.. if you are "stickhandling" it never does.. its in fact the exact definition of stick "handling".. what defines "possession" is "control of the puck".. and Makar had control the entire time. Easy decision.

NO GOAL

The Avs 3rd goal (off-side), 4th goal (PPG from challenging the NHL's incompetence/bias) .. and the 8th goal (EN) were all the result of the NHL's decision to re-write the NHL rule book as they conducted the review..

Oilers won 6-5


Game 2, Oilers need to tighten up in their own end (they did the last half of the game).. and then just keep pumping pucks past Kuemper.. icon_nod


Well, I'll disagree slightly. We didn't win, even if that's clearly a major turning point. It's impossible to know how the game plays out without that call.

I thought Woodcroft did a good job explaining it after the game. Makar carries the puck across the line and never makes any attempt to hold up or avoid playing the puck. As Jay says, "it's not like he stops and lifts his stick for a second, he doesn't even know his guy is off-side." To me, that's possession. The NHL blows down the play on possession on delayed off-sides and penalty kills regularly where the guy hasn't yet touched the puck. Here they're clinging to a fraction of a second, if you allow that he didn't still have the puck touching his stick when it fully crossed the blueline, which is controversial in its own right.

If this is really the rule, then undoubtedly refs get it wrong all the time when players are tagging up, as they need to see whether the puck actually touched the stick on his stickhandling or was between taps whenever they are making that call. That's just not consistent with the way the game is officiated.

Just a brutal call. Maybe that's the hockey gods coming back on us after the Calgary disallowed goal (which to me was a 50/50 play), although they still owe us for the McDavid "goalie interference" one a couple games earlier then.


There is no way a linesman saw all of the slow-mo replays in real time. If he isn't completely incompetant, the play is blown dead on the ice and none of this happens.

Unfortunately either Brad Kovachik (#71) or Devin Berg (#87) couldn't do the simplest part of their job right. He was a foot inside the zone!


Can see from the right side shot how the lineman is behind the line and trying to look through players to determine that offside. If he was on the line, very likely it's blown down.

Kind of our fault though, our crappy zone exit attempt is the reason the puck turns over fast, comes flying back into our zone and the linesman had to try to run back to our line. Just an unfortunate sequence of events. Double unfortunate for Nurse who makes the bad exit play throwing a puck knees high right at Kane (wth, seriously), and is in a crap position to try to challenge Makar and block the shot.

If the linesman sees it properly, it's dead. Since it came down to a review and getting to zoom in and figure out the first contact inside the zone, it becomes a good goal. Sucks.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 00:17]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808120 is a reply to message #808085 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 15:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2827
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 00:12

NetBOG wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 00:00

Adam wrote on Tue, 31 May 2022 23:50

Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 31 May 2022 23:37

Oh and just to be clear.. Ron McLean is an absolute embarrassment, his extended intermission "big-screen explanation" trying to confuse the audience into believing that the off-side goal was in fact not actually off-side was pathetic. He didn't even understand the drivel that was coming out of his own mouth. One of the most embarrassing displays of NHL bootlicking by media I've ever seen.

Can't believe that ass-hat claims to be a referee.

Makar had POSSESSION of the puck the entire time he crossed the blue line.. the puck NEVER left the control of his stick.. he did not "shoot" it in over the line and then "picked it up" on the other side of the blue line..

End. Of. Discussion.

You don't lose "possession" if the puck does not continually touch the stick.. if you are "stickhandling" it never does.. its in fact the exact definition of stick "handling".. what defines "possession" is "control of the puck".. and Makar had control the entire time. Easy decision.

NO GOAL

The Avs 3rd goal (off-side), 4th goal (PPG from challenging the NHL's incompetence/bias) .. and the 8th goal (EN) were all the result of the NHL's decision to re-write the NHL rule book as they conducted the review..

Oilers won 6-5


Game 2, Oilers need to tighten up in their own end (they did the last half of the game).. and then just keep pumping pucks past Kuemper.. icon_nod


Well, I'll disagree slightly. We didn't win, even if that's clearly a major turning point. It's impossible to know how the game plays out without that call.

I thought Woodcroft did a good job explaining it after the game. Makar carries the puck across the line and never makes any attempt to hold up or avoid playing the puck. As Jay says, "it's not like he stops and lifts his stick for a second, he doesn't even know his guy is off-side." To me, that's possession. The NHL blows down the play on possession on delayed off-sides and penalty kills regularly where the guy hasn't yet touched the puck. Here they're clinging to a fraction of a second, if you allow that he didn't still have the puck touching his stick when it fully crossed the blueline, which is controversial in its own right.

If this is really the rule, then undoubtedly refs get it wrong all the time when players are tagging up, as they need to see whether the puck actually touched the stick on his stickhandling or was between taps whenever they are making that call. That's just not consistent with the way the game is officiated.

Just a brutal call. Maybe that's the hockey gods coming back on us after the Calgary disallowed goal (which to me was a 50/50 play), although they still owe us for the McDavid "goalie interference" one a couple games earlier then.


There is no way a linesman saw all of the slow-mo replays in real time. If he isn't completely incompetant, the play is blown dead on the ice and none of this happens.

Unfortunately either Brad Kovachik (#71) or Devin Berg (#87) couldn't do the simplest part of their job right. He was a foot inside the zone!


Can see from the right side shot how the lineman is behind the line and trying to look through players to determine that offside. If he was on the line, very likely it's blown down.

Kind of our fault though, our crappy zone exit attempt is the reason the puck turns over fast, comes flying back into our zone and the linesman had to try to run back to our line. Just an unfortunate sequence of events. Double unfortunate for Nurse who makes the bad exit play throwing a puck knees high right at Kane (wth, seriously), and is in a crap position to try to challenge Makar and block the shot.

If the linesman sees it properly, it's dead. Since it came down to a review and getting to zoom in and figure out the first contact inside the zone, it becomes a good goal. Sucks.

There is no doubt in my mind that it took motivation and perseverance by Team NHL to find a way for that goal to stand. It shocked the Avs likely as much as the Oilers. The way it wasn't blown down as offside when it happened was the original act of incompetence.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808086 is a reply to message #808033 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 00:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3925
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUIfIzfVEAAoVi0?format=jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUIt5kwUYAInjHZ?format=png&name=small

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 01:15]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808087 is a reply to message #808086 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 00:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 00:29

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUIfIzfVEAAoVi0?format=jpg&name=small


Viewing from the other side though the puck is a couple inches away from his stick. He doesn't touch the puck inside the zone until much later :(

But, that is the angle the linesman would have seen if he didn't have to run back to get on the line after the quick turnover. Would have called the play dead for sure if he saw that.

If we had to give anything back to the hockey gods for the war room correctly assessing Coleman's intent to kick the puck in, I think this little sequence should satisfy it. Both right calls, but one for us, one against.

On to game 2. Gotta not play like ass, especially right after we score, which was the case for the Makar goal. A trash shift after a goal turned into 2 goals against on that one.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808088 is a reply to message #808033 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 01:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3925
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

Avalanche looks like they lost Burakovsky during the game.. LBI.. looked serious.. should have a weaker line up next game..


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808089 is a reply to message #808088 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 01:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2877
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 01:25

Avalanche looks like they lost Burakovsky during the game.. LBI.. looked serious.. should have a weaker line up next game..


Bouch blew him up good with a slapper, and the real kick in pants for Burakovsky is, his block didn't prevent a goal. He was doubled over as the Oilers were celebrating.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808090 is a reply to message #808089 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 04:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
clutchlikeeberle  is currently offline clutchlikeeberle
Messages: 251
Registered: April 2012

No Cups

As of July 1st, the Oilers officially have the worst contact in the NHL
Nurse does Zero things good. At least Keith is smart offensively. Man o man, Nurse can't even clear a puck anymore. That game falls square on his shoulders. Pathetic.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808091 is a reply to message #808033 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 04:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3925
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

A guy on LT's page wrote this.. listed the offside rule

In last nights case, as soon as the puck crosses the line it creates a "Delayed Offside" condition.. if Makar even just "attempts" to get possession of the puck while his teammate is still OFFSIDE, it triggers the automatic offside call. NHL Control doesn't even know their own rulebook.

According to the NHL rulebook.. that goal was OFFSIDE folks.

Quote:


Benign Bone
May 31, 2022 11:39 pm

Maybe I’ve missed something so feel free to chime in, but here’s what I’ve arrived at after a thorough analysis. Let’s start with Rule 83.1 Offside:

 83.1 Off-side – Players of the attacking team must not precede the puck into the attacking zone.

The position of the player’s skates and not that of his stick shall be the determining factor in all instances in deciding an off-side. A player is off-side when both skates are completely over the leading edge of the blue line involved in the play.

A player is on-side when either of his skates are in contact with the blue line, or on his own side of the line, at the instant the puck completely crosses the leading edge of the blue line. On his own side of the line shall be defined by a “plane” of the blue line which shall extend from the leading edge of the blue line upwards. If a player’s skate has yet to break the “plane” prior to the puck completely crossing the leading edge, he is deemed to be on-side for the purpose of the off-side rule.

A player actually controlling the puck who shall cross the line ahead of the puck shall not be considered “off-side,” provided he had possession and control of the puck prior to his skates crossing the leading edge of the blue line.

If a player legally carries, passes or plays the puck back into his own defending zone while a player of the opposing team is in such defending zone, the off-side shall be ignored and play permitted to continue.



There’s actually nothing mentioned about puck control, possession, or puck contact; merely that the player must not precede the puck into the attacking zone. This doesn’t play in favour of either side of the argument, but acts as the basis we need to understand before reading the delayed offside rule.

83.3 Delayed Off-side – A situation where an attacking player (or players) has preceded the puck across the attacking blue line, but the defending team is in a position to bring the puck back out of its defending zone without any delay or contact with an attacking player, or, the attacking players are in the process of clearing the attacking zone. If an off-side call is delayed, the Linesman shall drop his arm to nullify the off-side violation and allow play to continue if:


(i) All players of the offending team clear the zone at the same instant (skate contact with the blue line) permitting the attacking players to re-enter the attacking zone, or

(ii) The defending team passes or carries the puck into the neutral zone.

If, during the course of the delayed off-side, any member of the attacking team touches the puck, attempts to gain possession of a loose puck, forces the defending puck carrier further back into his own zone, or who is about to make physical contact with the defending puck carrier, the Linesman shall stop play for the off-side violation.



As we have to be equally particular with this rule as we were regarding the lack of explicit mention of puck possession/control/contact in the initial offside rule, we also need to concede that the assumption that ‘Situation i’ would therefore be making is that any player would have to clear the zone prior to the PUCK merely entering the zone and not prior to the puck entering the zone under full control of his attacking teammate.

However, even operating within that interpretive grey area, one could and should just as easily interpret Makar’s objectively fully-controlled entry (w/o contacting the puck) as constituting an “attempt to gain possession of a loose puck”.

It’s disappointing that this goal and the ensuing PP proved to be the difference in the game. Best we can do is chalk it up as ‘NHL rulebook karma’ from the Coleman goal and move on.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 05:18]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808093 is a reply to message #808091 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 06:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2141
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Spilled milk. Time to move on. Can’t change it and it’s not the reason we lost.

Need to tighten up. Avs are really good at scoring, but so are we. Thursday should be a great one!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808094 is a reply to message #808091 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 07:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 04:50

A guy on LT's page wrote this.. listed the offside rule

In last nights case, as soon as the puck crosses the line it creates a "Delayed Offside" condition.. if Makar even just "attempts" to get possession of the puck while his teammate is still OFFSIDE, it triggers the automatic offside call. NHL Control doesn't even know their own rulebook.

According to the NHL rulebook.. that goal was OFFSIDE folks.

Quote:


Benign Bone
May 31, 2022 11:39 pm

Maybe I’ve missed something so feel free to chime in, but here’s what I’ve arrived at after a thorough analysis. Let’s start with Rule 83.1 Offside:

 83.1 Off-side – Players of the attacking team must not precede the puck into the attacking zone.

The position of the player’s skates and not that of his stick shall be the determining factor in all instances in deciding an off-side. A player is off-side when both skates are completely over the leading edge of the blue line involved in the play.

A player is on-side when either of his skates are in contact with the blue line, or on his own side of the line, at the instant the puck completely crosses the leading edge of the blue line. On his own side of the line shall be defined by a “plane” of the blue line which shall extend from the leading edge of the blue line upwards. If a player’s skate has yet to break the “plane” prior to the puck completely crossing the leading edge, he is deemed to be on-side for the purpose of the off-side rule.

A player actually controlling the puck who shall cross the line ahead of the puck shall not be considered “off-side,” provided he had possession and control of the puck prior to his skates crossing the leading edge of the blue line.

If a player legally carries, passes or plays the puck back into his own defending zone while a player of the opposing team is in such defending zone, the off-side shall be ignored and play permitted to continue.



There’s actually nothing mentioned about puck control, possession, or puck contact; merely that the player must not precede the puck into the attacking zone. This doesn’t play in favour of either side of the argument, but acts as the basis we need to understand before reading the delayed offside rule.

83.3 Delayed Off-side – A situation where an attacking player (or players) has preceded the puck across the attacking blue line, but the defending team is in a position to bring the puck back out of its defending zone without any delay or contact with an attacking player, or, the attacking players are in the process of clearing the attacking zone. If an off-side call is delayed, the Linesman shall drop his arm to nullify the off-side violation and allow play to continue if:


(i) All players of the offending team clear the zone at the same instant (skate contact with the blue line) permitting the attacking players to re-enter the attacking zone, or

(ii) The defending team passes or carries the puck into the neutral zone.

If, during the course of the delayed off-side, any member of the attacking team touches the puck, attempts to gain possession of a loose puck, forces the defending puck carrier further back into his own zone, or who is about to make physical contact with the defending puck carrier, the Linesman shall stop play for the off-side violation.



As we have to be equally particular with this rule as we were regarding the lack of explicit mention of puck possession/control/contact in the initial offside rule, we also need to concede that the assumption that ‘Situation i’ would therefore be making is that any player would have to clear the zone prior to the PUCK merely entering the zone and not prior to the puck entering the zone under full control of his attacking teammate.

However, even operating within that interpretive grey area, one could and should just as easily interpret Makar’s objectively fully-controlled entry (w/o contacting the puck) as constituting an “attempt to gain possession of a loose puck”.

It’s disappointing that this goal and the ensuing PP proved to be the difference in the game. Best we can do is chalk it up as ‘NHL rulebook karma’ from the Coleman goal and move on.



They probably need to fix the wording of the offside rule, but I think the delayed offside is a condition that the linesman needs to establish exists in real time and then start making the judgement if the attacking team isgoing after the puck too aggressively before touching up. I don’t think a delayed offside condition exists for the purpose of an offside review.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808095 is a reply to message #808094 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 08:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3736
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

I completely understand now how they could make that play onside however the NHL decided to completely change what offside is to basically everyone. I saw ex players even after the explanation came out saying it was offside. I have no doubt in my mind Makar had possession of the puck. He had it coming towards the blueline, at the blueline he made a move to change it's direction, he pushed it over the blueline. It came off his stick for a split second while he was handling it. If Makar never had possession of that puck, the puck would not go in the direction it was going and do what it did. The NHL just made it so now they are deciding to read the minds of the players. So now every time the puck comes over the blueline, unless it's flat on the ice and the guy is pushing it, does he have possession? That was an easy call to make. The other player was FEET inside the zone before the puck came in so it would be pretty hard for anyone to say they got it wrong if it got called back. When a player is in the zone before the puck crosses the line, he's offside. End of story, everyone understands that. But instead, they made it complicated to where you are interpreting the rule in a certain way, then having to get the right camera angle and zoom in and then assume you got into his head correctly and know how he is thinking and what he is doing. The NHL NEVER does the easy thing.

For the game, pretty simple for me. The Oilers didn't show up again, especially the stars to start. I thought the Avs big guns came to play to start, the Oilers stars didn't. Opening draw, McD loses the face off then gives the puck up to Mackinnon 30 seconds in. I thought the Mackinnon line OWNED McD's line for a period and a half. When your best players don't show up on time, it trickles down through the team.

I didn't love Smith's game but I didn't think any of the goals were bad but you also need a big save at times and they didn't get one. I thought Koskinen was really good.

I think the Oilers need to swap Nurse and Kulak. Nurse is trying but when you need surgery on something, there is only so much you can do.

Silver lining, they were able to come back. They were able to score goals, damn near tied it. Avs goalies look very beatable. Avs will give up chances. Some guys who I thought needed to get going, got a goal. Nuge got a goal, McLeod got a goal, bonus goal from Ryan.

Go get the split!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808096 is a reply to message #808095 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 11:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1086
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:54

I think the Oilers need to swap Nurse and Kulak. Nurse is trying but when you need surgery on something, there is only so much you can do


Can't disagree there - Nurse is obviously laboring. He didn't look good at all last night.

Ditto for Keith - he looks confused out there at times. You see flashes of the perennial Norris contender at times with those head up laser passes up ice, but then he's wandering somewhere he has no business being, or just flat out getting beat.

Let's hope they are both better next game



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808097 is a reply to message #808096 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 11:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Mike wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:29

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:54

I think the Oilers need to swap Nurse and Kulak. Nurse is trying but when you need surgery on something, there is only so much you can do


Can't disagree there - Nurse is obviously laboring. He didn't look good at all last night.

Ditto for Keith - he looks confused out there at times. You see flashes of the perennial Norris contender at times with those head up laser passes up ice, but then he's wandering somewhere he has no business being, or just flat out getting beat.

Let's hope they are both better next game


Can't believe it but nurse and Keith have be longing for Russell. At least Russell us going to be in a good defensive position and making simple plays. The random crap nurse and Keith do gives me fits. Over of our most solid games of the playoffs was after the headbutt incident.

Might be time to try 7D again and try to reduce minutes of our expensive leaders in D who are simply not very dependable.




"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808098 is a reply to message #808097 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 11:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3736
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:46

Mike wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:29

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:54

I think the Oilers need to swap Nurse and Kulak. Nurse is trying but when you need surgery on something, there is only so much you can do


Can't disagree there - Nurse is obviously laboring. He didn't look good at all last night.

Ditto for Keith - he looks confused out there at times. You see flashes of the perennial Norris contender at times with those head up laser passes up ice, but then he's wandering somewhere he has no business being, or just flat out getting beat.

Let's hope they are both better next game


Can't believe it but nurse and Keith have be longing for Russell. At least Russell us going to be in a good defensive position and making simple plays. The random crap nurse and Keith do gives me fits. Over of our most solid games of the playoffs was after the headbutt incident.

Might be time to try 7D again and try to reduce minutes of our expensive leaders in D who are simply not very dependable.



So question for you. Do you scratch one of Keith, Nurse or both based on them having an off night while completely ignore the majority of good?

I feel and I've seen on twitter a ton from all his haters that Keith overall, have been pretty darn good. Yes he's had a few bad games, or makes a mistake bur for the huge majority of the time, he's been solid. Same goes for Nurse. He's clearly playing hurt, its limiting him but he still does a lot of good things. But I find all people focus on when it comes to a particular select few, is the bad. A guy could do 50 plays, 47 great, 3 bad and it's the bad a person focuses on.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808099 is a reply to message #808098 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:53

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:46

Mike wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:29

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:54

I think the Oilers need to swap Nurse and Kulak. Nurse is trying but when you need surgery on something, there is only so much you can do


Can't disagree there - Nurse is obviously laboring. He didn't look good at all last night.

Ditto for Keith - he looks confused out there at times. You see flashes of the perennial Norris contender at times with those head up laser passes up ice, but then he's wandering somewhere he has no business being, or just flat out getting beat.

Let's hope they are both better next game


Can't believe it but nurse and Keith have be longing for Russell. At least Russell us going to be in a good defensive position and making simple plays. The random crap nurse and Keith do gives me fits. Over of our most solid games of the playoffs was after the headbutt incident.

Might be time to try 7D again and try to reduce minutes of our expensive leaders in D who are simply not very dependable.



So question for you. Do you scratch one of Keith, Nurse or both based on them having an off night while completely ignore the majority of good?

I feel and I've seen on twitter a ton from all his haters that Keith overall, have been pretty darn good. Yes he's had a few bad games, or makes a mistake bur for the huge majority of the time, he's been solid. Same goes for Nurse. He's clearly playing hurt, its limiting him but he still does a lot of good things. But I find all people focus on when it comes to a particular select few, is the bad. A guy could do 50 plays, 47 great, 3 bad and it's the bad a person focuses on.


I wouldn't scratch because we don't have better players waiting. I would try to reduce minutes and take pressure off though with the 7D option.

I think judging a bad play needs to consider the intent of what the player was trying to do. If it is risk taking to try to create offense I think it is easier to accept when something goes wrong. When it is just absentminded wandering out of position or needless rushed plays, like throwing a puck at a teammates knee right after they recovered from falling down. Harder to accept. Those are just dumb plays with almost no potential benefit to the team. Most likely they were going to result in good chances or goals against.

What do you do with these players. Nurse is just buckling under pressure a bit. His physical talents that let him compensate with great skating have been hampered by injury. Keith is unapologetically just being Keith, he wants to just do whatever out there. Reduced minutes is probably the only option for both.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 12:18]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808100 is a reply to message #808098 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goose  is currently offline Goose
Messages: 1098
Registered: October 2006
Location: Vancouver

1 Cup

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 10:53


So question for you. Do you scratch one of Keith, Nurse or both based on them having an off night while completely ignore the majority of good?

I feel and I've seen on twitter a ton from all his haters that Keith overall, have been pretty darn good. Yes he's had a few bad games, or makes a mistake bur for the huge majority of the time, he's been solid. Same goes for Nurse. He's clearly playing hurt, its limiting him but he still does a lot of good things. But I find all people focus on when it comes to a particular select few, is the bad. A guy could do 50 plays, 47 great, 3 bad and it's the bad a person focuses on.


You must read different twitter than I do icon_wink

Duncan Keith has not been good, imo. He still does some things well, and he's got good offensive instincts, but he can't defend the rush or the cycle (he gets beat decisively leading to scoring chances against multiple times per game at this point), and he's too slow to consistently skate the puck out of the zone (which leads to him getting hemmed in), or participate in rush chances.

There's zero chance that he gets scratched, but there's no reason, other than reputation, that he should be playing more minutes than Kulak at this point.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8BxQTUsAI8nTe?format=png&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8B_6uVEAEXXkn?format=png&name=small

https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949782482526209?s=20& amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

Quote:

@NHL_Sid: Also, Keith's microstats are really concerning.

Alongside his brutal entry defence, he has 16 turnovers leading to shots. No Oilers player has more than 7.

He has 14 failed zone exits. No Oilers player has over 7.

He ranks last among Oilers D in DZ Breakups (only 2 in total).


https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949789595996160?s=20& amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 12:20]


Oilers Goal Differential
17/18: 234 GF / 263 GA (-29)
18/19: 232 GF / 274 GA (-42)
19/20 (82 game pace): 257 GF / 254 GA (+3) in 64 games
2021 (82 game pace):269 GF / 235 GA (+34) after 38 games

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808101 is a reply to message #808100 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1086
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Goose wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 15:14

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 10:53


So question for you. Do you scratch one of Keith, Nurse or both based on them having an off night while completely ignore the majority of good?

I feel and I've seen on twitter a ton from all his haters that Keith overall, have been pretty darn good. Yes he's had a few bad games, or makes a mistake bur for the huge majority of the time, he's been solid. Same goes for Nurse. He's clearly playing hurt, its limiting him but he still does a lot of good things. But I find all people focus on when it comes to a particular select few, is the bad. A guy could do 50 plays, 47 great, 3 bad and it's the bad a person focuses on.


You must read different twitter than I do icon_wink

Duncan Keith has not been good, imo. He still does some things well, and he's got good offensive instincts, but he can't defend the rush (he gets beat decisively leading to scoring chances against multiple times per game at this point), or the cycle and he's too slow to consistently skate the puck out of the zone (which leads to him getting hemmed in), or participate in rush chances.

There's zero chance that he gets scratched, but there's no reason, other than reputation, that he should be playing more minutes than Kulak at this point.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8BxQTUsAI8nTe?format=png&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8B_6uVEAEXXkn?format=png&name=small

https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949782482526209?s=20& amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

Quote:

@NHL_Sid: Also, Keith's microstats are really concerning.

Alongside his brutal entry defence, he has 16 turnovers leading to shots. No Oilers player has more than 7.

He has 14 failed zone exits. No Oilers player has over 7.

He ranks last among Oilers D in DZ Breakups (only 2 in total).


https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949789595996160?s=20& amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw


All invalid. He saw someone on Twitter say Keith was good, and he "saw him good", so you're obviously wrong with all this voodoo.

Anyway - I'm all for going with 7 D again. McDavid and RNH can easily absorb those 7 or so minutes. And the decreased workload would do wonders for them all I think.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808102 is a reply to message #808100 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6842
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Goose wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:14

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 10:53


So question for you. Do you scratch one of Keith, Nurse or both based on them having an off night while completely ignore the majority of good?

I feel and I've seen on twitter a ton from all his haters that Keith overall, have been pretty darn good. Yes he's had a few bad games, or makes a mistake bur for the huge majority of the time, he's been solid. Same goes for Nurse. He's clearly playing hurt, its limiting him but he still does a lot of good things. But I find all people focus on when it comes to a particular select few, is the bad. A guy could do 50 plays, 47 great, 3 bad and it's the bad a person focuses on.


You must read different twitter than I do icon_wink

Duncan Keith has not been good, imo. He still does some things well, and he's got good offensive instincts, but he can't defend the rush or the cycle (he gets beat decisively leading to scoring chances against multiple times per game at this point), and he's too slow to consistently skate the puck out of the zone (which leads to him getting hemmed in), or participate in rush chances.

There's zero chance that he gets scratched, but there's no reason, other than reputation, that he should be playing more minutes than Kulak at this point.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8BxQTUsAI8nTe?format=png&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8B_6uVEAEXXkn?format=png&name=small

https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949782482526209?s=20& amp; amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

Quote:

@NHL_Sid: Also, Keith's microstats are really concerning.

Alongside his brutal entry defence, he has 16 turnovers leading to shots. No Oilers player has more than 7.

He has 14 failed zone exits. No Oilers player has over 7.

He ranks last among Oilers D in DZ Breakups (only 2 in total).


https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949789595996160?s=20& amp; amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw


All you can hope about Keith is that A) as with Ken Holland, we win the Cup and he decides to retire as a winner and B) Bob Stauffer's rumour this week about the Oilers wanting to extend him for two more years after next year is just inane musings by the big man, and not indicative of any actual Oilers plan to double down on one of their biggest mistakes they've made in the last couple years.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808106 is a reply to message #808102 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smyth260  is currently offline smyth260
Messages: 957
Registered: November 2007

No Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:24


B) Bob Stauffer's rumour this week about the Oilers wanting to extend him for two more years after next year is just inane musings by the big man, and not indicative of any actual Oilers plan to double down on one of their biggest mistakes they've made in the last couple years.



Oh god….



Clean house or bust

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808108 is a reply to message #808106 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

smyth260 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:33

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 11:24


B) Bob Stauffer's rumour this week about the Oilers wanting to extend him for two more years after next year is just inane musings by the big man, and not indicative of any actual Oilers plan to double down on one of their biggest mistakes they've made in the last couple years.



Oh god….


Can we just pay Keith 5.5M to take over whatever Paul Coffey has been doing



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808104 is a reply to message #808100 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3736
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Goose wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:14

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 10:53


So question for you. Do you scratch one of Keith, Nurse or both based on them having an off night while completely ignore the majority of good?

I feel and I've seen on twitter a ton from all his haters that Keith overall, have been pretty darn good. Yes he's had a few bad games, or makes a mistake bur for the huge majority of the time, he's been solid. Same goes for Nurse. He's clearly playing hurt, its limiting him but he still does a lot of good things. But I find all people focus on when it comes to a particular select few, is the bad. A guy could do 50 plays, 47 great, 3 bad and it's the bad a person focuses on.


You must read different twitter than I do icon_wink

Duncan Keith has not been good, imo. He still does some things well, and he's got good offensive instincts, but he can't defend the rush (he gets beat decisively leading to scoring chances against multiple times per game at this point), or the cycle and he's too slow to consistently skate the puck out of the zone (which leads to him getting hemmed in), or participate in rush chances.

There's zero chance that he gets scratched, but there's no reason, other than reputation, that he should be playing more minutes than Kulak at this point.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8BxQTUsAI8nTe?format=png&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8B_6uVEAEXXkn?format=png&name=small

https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949782482526209?s=20& amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

Quote:

@NHL_Sid: Also, Keith's microstats are really concerning.

Alongside his brutal entry defence, he has 16 turnovers leading to shots. No Oilers player has more than 7.

He has 14 failed zone exits. No Oilers player has over 7.

He ranks last among Oilers D in DZ Breakups (only 2 in total).


https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949789595996160?s=20& amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

I agree. I think the Oilers should be playing all 6 in similar minutes. I also agree he has made mistakes but he's made a lot of good plays as well.

Does any of those stats you listed, show how many goals against he's been on for? I am sure some people will ridicule me but some of those advanced stats don't mean a hell of a lot to me. Sure they tell some of the story but how the team plays, their system and how the player plays can impact the numbers. For me its all about the goals. Who ever scores more wins. SO if a dman does stop the puck being carried in as much but don't give up a lot of goals because he's good down low, I don't really care as much. If the dman gives up a lot of long range shots that have next to zero chance of going in, compared to another guy, I don't care. That's what I would like to know.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808107 is a reply to message #808104 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6842
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:30


Does any of those stats you listed, show how many goals against he's been on for? I am sure some people will ridicule me but some of those advanced stats don't mean a hell of a lot to me. Sure they tell some of the story but how the team plays, their system and how the player plays can impact the numbers. For me its all about the goals. Who ever scores more wins. SO if a dman does stop the puck being carried in as much but don't give up a lot of goals because he's good down low, I don't really care as much. If the dman gives up a lot of long range shots that have next to zero chance of going in, compared to another guy, I don't care. That's what I would like to know.


Duncan Keith is -5 in a playoffs where we're 8-5 so far. So yeah, he's giving up a lot.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808109 is a reply to message #808107 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:34

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:30


Does any of those stats you listed, show how many goals against he's been on for? I am sure some people will ridicule me but some of those advanced stats don't mean a hell of a lot to me. Sure they tell some of the story but how the team plays, their system and how the player plays can impact the numbers. For me its all about the goals. Who ever scores more wins. SO if a dman does stop the puck being carried in as much but don't give up a lot of goals because he's good down low, I don't really care as much. If the dman gives up a lot of long range shots that have next to zero chance of going in, compared to another guy, I don't care. That's what I would like to know.


Duncan Keith is -5 in a playoffs where we're 8-5 so far. So yeah, he's giving up a lot.


Those weren't really that advanced of stats either. Just looking at how guys defend rushes against. The stuff that was killing us with Tippett coaching, with all our D giving up the blueline easy, that Manson has tried to fix. Keith is the lone holdout, clearly. You attack the right side on us when Keith is on the ice, chances are you are gonna get in the zone with possession and have lots of options to attack. The Keith abides when you wish to enter the Oilers zone. Been some really significant goals against in the playoffs where Keith is in full abide mode for someone entering our zone on his side.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 12:41]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808111 is a reply to message #808109 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 12:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6842
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:37

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:34

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:30


Does any of those stats you listed, show how many goals against he's been on for? I am sure some people will ridicule me but some of those advanced stats don't mean a hell of a lot to me. Sure they tell some of the story but how the team plays, their system and how the player plays can impact the numbers. For me its all about the goals. Who ever scores more wins. SO if a dman does stop the puck being carried in as much but don't give up a lot of goals because he's good down low, I don't really care as much. If the dman gives up a lot of long range shots that have next to zero chance of going in, compared to another guy, I don't care. That's what I would like to know.


Duncan Keith is -5 in a playoffs where we're 8-5 so far. So yeah, he's giving up a lot.


Those weren't really that advanced of stats either. Just looking at how guys defend rushes against. The stuff that was killing us with Tippett coaching, with all our D giving up the blueline easy, that Manson has tried to fix. Keith is the lone holdout, clearly. You attack the right side on us when Keith is on the ice, chances are you are gonna get in the zone with possession and have lots of options to attack. The Keith abides when you wish to enter the Oilers zone. Been some really significant goals against in the playoffs where Keith is in full abide mode for someone entering our zone on his side.


To be fair to him, he's got no wheels so he may WANT to do what Manson's telling him to...he just can't. I do think it's funny that the media narrative is that he's stabilizing Bouchard, when the numbers really show it's the reverse if anything.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808121 is a reply to message #808111 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 15:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:45

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:37

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:34

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:30


Does any of those stats you listed, show how many goals against he's been on for? I am sure some people will ridicule me but some of those advanced stats don't mean a hell of a lot to me. Sure they tell some of the story but how the team plays, their system and how the player plays can impact the numbers. For me its all about the goals. Who ever scores more wins. SO if a dman does stop the puck being carried in as much but don't give up a lot of goals because he's good down low, I don't really care as much. If the dman gives up a lot of long range shots that have next to zero chance of going in, compared to another guy, I don't care. That's what I would like to know.


Duncan Keith is -5 in a playoffs where we're 8-5 so far. So yeah, he's giving up a lot.


Those weren't really that advanced of stats either. Just looking at how guys defend rushes against. The stuff that was killing us with Tippett coaching, with all our D giving up the blueline easy, that Manson has tried to fix. Keith is the lone holdout, clearly. You attack the right side on us when Keith is on the ice, chances are you are gonna get in the zone with possession and have lots of options to attack. The Keith abides when you wish to enter the Oilers zone. Been some really significant goals against in the playoffs where Keith is in full abide mode for someone entering our zone on his side.


To be fair to him, he's got no wheels so he may WANT to do what Manson's telling him to...he just can't. I do think it's funny that the media narrative is that he's stabilizing Bouchard, when the numbers really show it's the reverse if anything.


I'm just not seeing the effort. Would like to think Keith is more inclined now to challenge at the blue line, but still see him backpedaling as fast as he can and starting the out of range stick waving.

Think it would be fair to say Bouch is the guy helping the pair out more. Good learning experience for him I guess.

https://i.ibb.co/dkVNVP3/Bouch-Keith.jpg

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 15:51]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808123 is a reply to message #808121 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 16:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5699
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 15:48

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:45

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:37

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:34

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:30


Does any of those stats you listed, show how many goals against he's been on for? I am sure some people will ridicule me but some of those advanced stats don't mean a hell of a lot to me. Sure they tell some of the story but how the team plays, their system and how the player plays can impact the numbers. For me its all about the goals. Who ever scores more wins. SO if a dman does stop the puck being carried in as much but don't give up a lot of goals because he's good down low, I don't really care as much. If the dman gives up a lot of long range shots that have next to zero chance of going in, compared to another guy, I don't care. That's what I would like to know.


Duncan Keith is -5 in a playoffs where we're 8-5 so far. So yeah, he's giving up a lot.


Those weren't really that advanced of stats either. Just looking at how guys defend rushes against. The stuff that was killing us with Tippett coaching, with all our D giving up the blueline easy, that Manson has tried to fix. Keith is the lone holdout, clearly. You attack the right side on us when Keith is on the ice, chances are you are gonna get in the zone with possession and have lots of options to attack. The Keith abides when you wish to enter the Oilers zone. Been some really significant goals against in the playoffs where Keith is in full abide mode for someone entering our zone on his side.


To be fair to him, he's got no wheels so he may WANT to do what Manson's telling him to...he just can't. I do think it's funny that the media narrative is that he's stabilizing Bouchard, when the numbers really show it's the reverse if anything.


I'm just not seeing the effort. Would like to think Keith is more inclined now to challenge at the blue line, but still see him backpedaling as fast as he can and starting the out of range stick waving.

Think it would be fair to say Bouch is the guy helping the pair out more. Good learning experience for him I guess.

https://i.ibb.co/dkVNVP3/Bouch-Keith.jpg


The thing that stands out to me is that we have basically one dman on the left side now who is consistent in their play. Keith has had moments. Nurse… sure use the injured excuse but the dude’s been missing marbles for quite some time so try again. But Kulak is the only left side D who is reliable night in, night out.

I’m also rather high on Must right now though, so not sure if im making much sense



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808124 is a reply to message #808123 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 16:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3736
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 16:32

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 15:48

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:45

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:37

Adam wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:34

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:30


Does any of those stats you listed, show how many goals against he's been on for? I am sure some people will ridicule me but some of those advanced stats don't mean a hell of a lot to me. Sure they tell some of the story but how the team plays, their system and how the player plays can impact the numbers. For me its all about the goals. Who ever scores more wins. SO if a dman does stop the puck being carried in as much but don't give up a lot of goals because he's good down low, I don't really care as much. If the dman gives up a lot of long range shots that have next to zero chance of going in, compared to another guy, I don't care. That's what I would like to know.


Duncan Keith is -5 in a playoffs where we're 8-5 so far. So yeah, he's giving up a lot.


Those weren't really that advanced of stats either. Just looking at how guys defend rushes against. The stuff that was killing us with Tippett coaching, with all our D giving up the blueline easy, that Manson has tried to fix. Keith is the lone holdout, clearly. You attack the right side on us when Keith is on the ice, chances are you are gonna get in the zone with possession and have lots of options to attack. The Keith abides when you wish to enter the Oilers zone. Been some really significant goals against in the playoffs where Keith is in full abide mode for someone entering our zone on his side.


To be fair to him, he's got no wheels so he may WANT to do what Manson's telling him to...he just can't. I do think it's funny that the media narrative is that he's stabilizing Bouchard, when the numbers really show it's the reverse if anything.


I'm just not seeing the effort. Would like to think Keith is more inclined now to challenge at the blue line, but still see him backpedaling as fast as he can and starting the out of range stick waving.

Think it would be fair to say Bouch is the guy helping the pair out more. Good learning experience for him I guess.

https://i.ibb.co/dkVNVP3/Bouch-Keith.jpg


The thing that stands out to me is that we have basically one dman on the left side now who is consistent in their play. Keith has had moments. Nurse… sure use the injured excuse but the dude’s been missing marbles for quite some time so try again. But Kulak is the only left side D who is reliable night in, night out.

I’m also rather high on Must right now though, so not sure if im making much sense

The whole team was frantic for a period and a half doing bone headed plays. McD turned the puck over to MacKinnon 30 seconds into the game so I have a hard time singling out particular players when the whole team was lousy and once again felt their way into the game instead of coming out firing like they were supposed too.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808126 is a reply to message #808123 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 16:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 16:32



The thing that stands out to me is that we have basically one dman on the left side now who is consistent in their play. Keith has had moments. Nurse… sure use the injured excuse but the dude’s been missing marbles for quite some time so try again. But Kulak is the only left side D who is reliable night in, night out.

I’m also rather high on Must right now though, so not sure if im making much sense


Ceci-Kulak was the shutdown pair when Nurse was suspended I think? Honestly would think about trying that again. Kulak is a solid skater and has done a good job defensively. As many offensive guys that Colorado has, they still load up 1 line mainly. Kadri can still burn you, but still a big drop off after their top line. If we can get very solid defensive play against those guys we have a shot. If that Colorado top line is gonna constantly find openings with our D out of position though, you're gonna have a bad time.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808128 is a reply to message #808126 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 17:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5699
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 16:59

Oscargasm wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 16:32



The thing that stands out to me is that we have basically one dman on the left side now who is consistent in their play. Keith has had moments. Nurse… sure use the injured excuse but the dude’s been missing marbles for quite some time so try again. But Kulak is the only left side D who is reliable night in, night out.

I’m also rather high on Must right now though, so not sure if im making much sense


Ceci-Kulak was the shutdown pair when Nurse was suspended I think? Honestly would think about trying that again. Kulak is a solid skater and has done a good job defensively. As many offensive guys that Colorado has, they still load up 1 line mainly. Kadri can still burn you, but still a big drop off after their top line. If we can get very solid defensive play against those guys we have a shot. If that Colorado top line is gonna constantly find openings with our D out of position though, you're gonna have a bad time.


Absolutely. And while we’re at it, give 11-7 a shot here to protect Nurse’ minutes bc you know full well he won’t sit. Russ’ shot blocking to save a few of those shots on Smithskinen? Or Broberg to combat the high energy Avs with his quick puck movement.

*this also gives the opportunity to sit Arch or Kass which, let’s be real here, they bring nothing. I’d be in favour of them both out and bringing in a guy like Shore as they would be ‘pulling out a pker’.

Which brings me to another point. This whole narrative from Gregor, Stauffer and the other crap YEG Media covering the Oil. We’ve seen McLeod and Ryan, Nuge and Hyman as main pairs lately, Huge more than McRy. Arch isn’t in that top 4. He’s 6th in TOI for Oilers forwards, 5th… Yamo. YAMO has ~7 minutes more TOI this playoff at Pk than Archibald. And near the end of kills, they send Drai, McD, Kane out there. So this whole Arch is relied upon to pk is trash. It’s a lame attempt from the Neanderthal media that covers this team. Sit. Archibald. And. Kassian.

*Natural Statrick used as pk TOI source.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808114 is a reply to message #808100 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 14:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrudeRemarks  is currently offline CrudeRemarks
Messages: 1698
Registered: November 2010
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

Goose wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 12:14

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 10:53


So question for you. Do you scratch one of Keith, Nurse or both based on them having an off night while completely ignore the majority of good?

I feel and I've seen on twitter a ton from all his haters that Keith overall, have been pretty darn good. Yes he's had a few bad games, or makes a mistake bur for the huge majority of the time, he's been solid. Same goes for Nurse. He's clearly playing hurt, its limiting him but he still does a lot of good things. But I find all people focus on when it comes to a particular select few, is the bad. A guy could do 50 plays, 47 great, 3 bad and it's the bad a person focuses on.


You must read different twitter than I do icon_wink

Duncan Keith has not been good, imo. He still does some things well, and he's got good offensive instincts, but he can't defend the rush or the cycle (he gets beat decisively leading to scoring chances against multiple times per game at this point), and he's too slow to consistently skate the puck out of the zone (which leads to him getting hemmed in), or participate in rush chances.

There's zero chance that he gets scratched, but there's no reason, other than reputation, that he should be playing more minutes than Kulak at this point.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8BxQTUsAI8nTe?format=png&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT8B_6uVEAEXXkn?format=png&name=small

https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949782482526209?s=20& amp; amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

Quote:

@NHL_Sid: Also, Keith's microstats are really concerning.

Alongside his brutal entry defence, he has 16 turnovers leading to shots. No Oilers player has more than 7.

He has 14 failed zone exits. No Oilers player has over 7.

He ranks last among Oilers D in DZ Breakups (only 2 in total).


https://twitter.com/NHL_Sid/status/1530949789595996160?s=20& amp; amp; amp; amp;t=H1kFmM1ibhJbURWNlgWzYw

your fancy stats don't take intangibles into account. Keith is closer to his kid. Family, that's what's really important, but how do you measure that?




You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808115 is a reply to message #808114 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 14:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3736
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

I keep hearing them talk about the goal and how they got it right based on the rules. Now they are raving about Makar and an incredible play.

If the linesmen did their job, that would have been called offside because the winger was over a foot in the zone. No way the Avs challenge that because the video looks SOOO bad. Its still a bad call even if it's based on a technicality it was legal because there is no way at full speed a linemen could see Makar not tough it for a split second. So they missed a call.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808117 is a reply to message #808115 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 14:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 14:27

I keep hearing them talk about the goal and how they got it right based on the rules. Now they are raving about Makar and an incredible play.

If the linesmen did their job, that would have been called offside because the winger was over a foot in the zone. No way the Avs challenge that because the video looks SOOO bad. Its still a bad call even if it's based on a technicality it was legal because there is no way at full speed a linemen could see Makar not tough it for a split second. So they missed a call.


Would have been nothing to challenge if the linesman belt the play dead. Just another play.

Hard to fault the linesman though. Nurse had control and made the play up the ice. unfortunately throwing it into Kane's knee right after Kane got up from a fall. Makar saw the bad play and jumped on it and he's instantly going into our zone. The linesman sadly does not move as fast as Makar and is looking through bodies as he tries to get back on the line. Just everything working together perfectly to create a crap situation for the Oilers.

Make less trash plays from game 2 on and hopefully chances of this kind of stuff goes down dramatically.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 14:36]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808118 is a reply to message #808117 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 14:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3736
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 14:34

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 14:27

I keep hearing them talk about the goal and how they got it right based on the rules. Now they are raving about Makar and an incredible play.

If the linesmen did their job, that would have been called offside because the winger was over a foot in the zone. No way the Avs challenge that because the video looks SOOO bad. Its still a bad call even if it's based on a technicality it was legal because there is no way at full speed a linemen could see Makar not tough it for a split second. So they missed a call.


Would have been nothing to challenge if the linesman belt the play dead. Just another play.

Hard to fault the linesman though. Nurse had control and made the play up the ice. unfortunately throwing it into Kane's knee right after Kane got up from a fall. Makar saw the bad play and jumped on it and he's instantly going into our zone. The linesman sadly does not move as fast as Makar and is looking through bodies as he tries to get back on the line. Just everything working together perfectly to create a crap situation for the Oilers.

Make less trash plays from game 2 on and hopefully chances of this kind of stuff goes down dramatically.

It's the linesmen job though. If you watch the play, Makar picks off the pass half way to the center line. We aren't talking inches here, like 10-12 ft out of the zone. Nichkushkin is easily 15 or more in the zone. Then you watch it and when the puck hits the blue line, he's several feet inside. So the first instinct of the linesman should have been to play it dead. But he didn't.
You telling me the linesman from the across the ice can see Makar lost control of the puck for a split second? Hell no. But he sure as hell can see over a foot of white ice in between the blueline and Nickkushkins skate. So what exactly was he doing?

Refs and linesment blow down plays for way, way less obvious things. So if you are looking down the line, it's pretty easy to see the Avs guy in the zone before the puck crosses and it's not close. So regardless of if the goal was legal based on a technicality, how did they not think to blow that down. Refs blow down plays if they lose sight of the puck for a second all the time but this was let go? I don't get it.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 14:57]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808119 is a reply to message #808118 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 15:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9703
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 14:52

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 14:34

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 14:27

I keep hearing them talk about the goal and how they got it right based on the rules. Now they are raving about Makar and an incredible play.

If the linesmen did their job, that would have been called offside because the winger was over a foot in the zone. No way the Avs challenge that because the video looks SOOO bad. Its still a bad call even if it's based on a technicality it was legal because there is no way at full speed a linemen could see Makar not tough it for a split second. So they missed a call.


Would have been nothing to challenge if the linesman belt the play dead. Just another play.

Hard to fault the linesman though. Nurse had control and made the play up the ice. unfortunately throwing it into Kane's knee right after Kane got up from a fall. Makar saw the bad play and jumped on it and he's instantly going into our zone. The linesman sadly does not move as fast as Makar and is looking through bodies as he tries to get back on the line. Just everything working together perfectly to create a crap situation for the Oilers.

Make less trash plays from game 2 on and hopefully chances of this kind of stuff goes down dramatically.

It's the linesmen job though. If you watch the play, Makar picks off the pass half way to the center line. We aren't talking inches here, like 10-12 ft out of the zone. Nichkushkin is easily 15 or more in the zone. Then you watch it and when the puck hits the blue line, he's several feet inside. So the first instinct of the linesman should have been to play it dead. But he didn't.
You telling me the linesman from the across the ice can see Makar lost control of the puck for a split second? Hell no. But he sure as hell can see over a foot of white ice in between the blueline and Nickkushkins skate. So what exactly was he doing?

Refs and linesment blow down plays for way, way less obvious things. So if you are looking down the line, it's pretty easy to see the Avs guy in the zone before the puck crosses and it's not close. So regardless of if the goal was legal based on a technicality, how did they not think to blow that down. Refs blow down plays if they lose sight of the puck for a second all the time but this was let go? I don't get it.


Yeah, linesman missed it there for sure. But in the end, it wasn't offside. So, we would have been hoping for the linesman to better predict the bad pass into Kane's leg turning into an instant rush against, and then blowing dead a play that was actually technically onside. It's a big ask from the hockey gods that was not given to us :)

Better probably to just not make terrible passes a foot and a half off the ice at our teammates legs.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808116 is a reply to message #808033 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3925
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

One guy on Sportsnet doesn't have his head up his ass.. unlike .. #R. Mclean.. #Friedman

https://twitter.com/jtbourne/status/1531804956247961603?cxt= HHwWhsC9pb2fiMIqAAAA

Quote:

Justin Bourne @jtbourne
Alright I’ve watched it a handful more times, and heard Elliotte explain it, and reached my conclusion: that’s still offside. Let’s not galaxy brain this thing, that’s “control” for me by Makar, he has it, player isn’t out, offside.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 14:33]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808127 is a reply to message #808116 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 17:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stemhovlichski  is currently offline stemhovlichski
Messages: 346
Registered: March 2006
Location: NSR

No Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 14:31

One guy on Sportsnet doesn't have his head up his ass.. unlike .. #R. Mclean.. #Friedman

https://twitter.com/jtbourne/status/1531804956247961603?cxt= HHwWhsC9pb2fiMIqAAAA

Quote:

Justin Bourne @jtbourne
Alright I’ve watched it a handful more times, and heard Elliotte explain it, and reached my conclusion: that’s still offside. Let’s not galaxy brain this thing, that’s “control” for me by Makar, he has it, player isn’t out, offside.



Possession and control are two different things. For example, "Rule 508 – Penalty Shot – The player fouled must be in possession and have control of the puck". Two different conditions that have to be met.

Possession pretty much means the last person to touch the puck. If I lose the puck in my end and Janne Niinimaa passes it all the way back into the Oilers' net, I get awarded the goal because I was the last player in POSSESSION of the puck on my team. e.g., Billy Smith 1G on the scoresheet.

Control "means the act of propelling the puck with the stick, hand or feet." It is interpreted as meaning the puck is directly under the player's control - either on the stick, in the stickhandle, on the skate blade or in/on the glove.
-You can't score by throwing the puck (unless you're Nelson Emerson) because you're deemed to have control, but it can deflect in off your glove and be a good goal (no control).
-You can't kick the puck in (unless your Hockey Ops) because you are deemed to have control, but it can go off your skate and count (no control).
-You can't be called offside while skating backwards if the puck is either on your blade or in your stickhandle because you are deemed to have control.

The Avs' players read the pass and intercepted it: he gained possession AND control. He chipped it forward: he still had possession but NO control. The puck entered the zone offside but NOT UNDER CONTROL so NO whistle, then one split second later both he and his offside teammate tagged up at the blueline together so NO players were offside as of that exact moment, so that cancelled the offside puck and made it onside. Avs' player regained CONTROL of the puck in the zone (he always had possession) and unleashed a shot that Smith flopped down like a walrus on.

The linesmen have been advised to allow plays to continue unless they're 100% sure of the whistle. Better to have a goal and a review than to stop rushes and kill close plays. Is this offside interpretation called accurately 100% of the time? 773H no!!!

You don't have to agree with it, but that's the NHL rule and they got it right.

Game 1 is over, let's get game 2 won.




Restored: "We're sucking hind banana here." - Pat Quinn, Jan 18, 2010

"...the Oilers have been rebuilding for so long that it’s hard not to be cynical." - NBC's Ryan Dadoun Jan 2, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808129 is a reply to message #808033 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 18:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kungpaobenji27  is currently offline kungpaobenji27
Messages: 271
Registered: August 2003
Location: Irving, Texas

No Cups

I think the Oilers will bounce back from this....however, this is probably the most painful game 1 loss of the playoffs for me personally.

Hate to be the guy with the debbie downer scarcity mentality....but it sucks to lose one where we actually score 6 WITH the 2nd/3rd lines contributing at ES as well. Feels like such a waste...

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 18:05]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808130 is a reply to message #808129 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 18:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5699
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

kungpaobenji27 wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 18:02

I think the Oilers will bounce back from this....however, this is probably the most painful game 1 loss of the playoffs for me personally.

Hate to be the guy with the debbie downer scarcity mentality....but it sucks to lose one where we actually score 6 WITH the 2nd/3rd lines contributing at ES as well. Feels like such a waste...


Derek Ryan scored one as well…

Avs are an entirely different monster than Calgary’s big and tough style.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808131 is a reply to message #808033 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 18:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5699
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Adrian Dater, Avs insider put this tweet out just a few moments ago;
Hearing there are/were Kuemper concussion symptoms from pucks to mask last night, symptoms which include vision/fogginess. Had previous eye injury too. Fluid situation. A couple good nights’ rest be all needed. Tomorrow key



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1) [message #808132 is a reply to message #808131 ]
Wed, 01 June 2022 20:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3925
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Wed, 01 June 2022 17:22

Adrian Dater, Avs insider put this tweet out just a few moments ago;
Hearing there are/were Kuemper concussion symptoms from pucks to mask last night, symptoms which include vision/fogginess. Had previous eye injury too. Fluid situation. A couple good nights’ rest be all needed. Tomorrow key


Shoot high and hard..



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

Pages (3): [ «  <  1  2  3  >  »]  
Previous Topic:Pregame: Colorado @ Edmonton (Game #3)
Next Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #2)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca