This day on April 29
None

Happy Birthday To: eightythree, yanner39, Smid4Life, Oil Spill, Ginjanna, Sopranosbaby, epower, Brewer84, rufeo01, OilCup2017

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Ekholm trade
Pages (2): [1  2  >  »]
Switch to nested viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Ekholm trade [message #818726]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:42 Go to next message
Adrean  is currently offline Adrean
Messages: 41
Registered: January 2006
Location: Calgary (for work, not th...

No Cups

Elliotte Friedman
@FriedgeHNIC
·
50s
It's Ekholm and a sixth to EDM
To NASH it's Tyson Barrie, Reid Schaefer, a first this year and a fourth.



benv wrote on Thu, 02 November 2017 Adrean wins his first Survivor title!
CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 13 February 2019 Mighty Adrean is a two time champion
CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 19 February 2020 For the third time Adam's Dad stands victorious

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818729 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skoobz  is currently offline Skoobz
Messages: 334
Registered: January 2006

No Cups

That's a lot of return for NSH with no retention for a 32 year old. Great deal for THIS year. Future, we'll see.

I think more is coming.



"[It was] really cool to throw on the Oilers gear, the gear that I want to play the rest of my life wearing. It was pretty cool to put it on. With all the history, it was a lot of fun." - Connor McDavid, July 1, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818731 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9640
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Adrean wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:42

Elliotte Friedman
@FriedgeHNIC
·
50s
It's Ekholm and a sixth to EDM
To NASH it's Tyson Barrie, Reid Schaefer, a first this year and a fourth.


Feel like Barrie and a 1st is a lot to give up unless nash is retaining a good chunk of salary.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818733 is a reply to message #818731 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
oilfan94  is currently offline oilfan94
Messages: 344
Registered: June 2006
Location: USA

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:52

Adrean wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:42

Elliotte Friedman
@FriedgeHNIC
·
50s
It's Ekholm and a sixth to EDM
To NASH it's Tyson Barrie, Reid Schaefer, a first this year and a fourth.


Feel like Barrie and a 1st is a lot to give up unless nash is retaining a good chunk of salary.


They are retaining 4% so his hit is $6M even for us.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818734 is a reply to message #818729 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JPro  is currently offline JPro
Messages: 785
Registered: January 2006
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Skoobz wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:50

That's a lot of return for NSH with no retention for a 32 year old. Great deal for THIS year. Future, we'll see.

I think more is coming.

They're retaining 4% of his salary. We have a master negotiator on our side. Don't you forget it ;)



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818735 is a reply to message #818733 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7642
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

oilfan94 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:55



They are retaining 4% so his hit is $6M even for us.

LOL!

Math is a lot easier with round numbers.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818737 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smyth260  is currently offline smyth260
Messages: 949
Registered: November 2007

No Cups

He’s a good player right now, but it does seem like a lot for a contract that may not age well. 33 this May and 3 more years at 6M after this. Hopefully he still has a few good years in him.

How much does Barrie and Puljujarvi out and Ekholm in move the needle? Still think we need to add here.

The advance stats community loves this for us so that’s a good sign.

Let’s see what happens.




Clean house or bust

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818738 is a reply to message #818735 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 927
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

No Cups

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.


Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818739 is a reply to message #818735 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3705
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

I like the trade. Schaefer is probably 2-3 yrs min away. The first this year is hopefully a low pick and Barrie to make the money work.

This is a win now move. Moving out future to bring in a guy that fits exactly what they need. A top 4 dman that defends very well, helps on the PK, brings some physical play. He's something they lack. I like the trade, I think it gives the Oilers the exact type of dman they need..

[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 16:03]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818740 is a reply to message #818738 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7642
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.

Bouchard becomes Barrie? I think the PP might take a hit, but that becomes less valuable as the year goes on.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818741 is a reply to message #818738 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9640
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.


Gonna take a bet that the PP will be fine. It was tops in the league before Barrie got here. Always scored fine even when Nurse had to fill in. Maybe little growing pain for Bouch, but we really don't ask that much of the D for the PP. Just to not screw up and lose the puck. Honestly we should have been using him there more already to prepare for Barrie inevitably leaving.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818742 is a reply to message #818740 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Babaganoosh2.0  is currently offline Babaganoosh2.0
Messages: 396
Registered: December 2018
Location: Southern AB

No Cups

Finally another defenseman capable of playing 20+ minutes a night.

[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 17:04]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818743 is a reply to message #818738 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3913
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 14:59

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.


Can't see it.. big hole on the PP.. Barrie has good instincts at PP QB.. can't see either Nurse or Bouchard being capable of the task.



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818744 is a reply to message #818740 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3705
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:00

nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.

Bouchard becomes Barrie? I think the PP might take a hit, but that becomes less valuable as the year goes on.

It will be interesting to see how much different the PP with with Bouchard.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818748 is a reply to message #818737 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3705
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

I do like that they didn't have to give up on any of their right now, ready to go prospects. Holloway, Broberg are ready to go to impact the line up now and for the next few seasons. Bourgault could be close. Even Bouchard is still a bit of a prospect in my opinion because he's not a finished product.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818749 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kungpaobenji27  is currently offline kungpaobenji27
Messages: 263
Registered: August 2003
Location: Irving, Texas

No Cups

Bouchard's lateral skating isn't what it needs to be on the PP....maybe even less effective than Klefbom. At this rate, I'd rather see Nuge quarterbacking the PP from the blue line than having Bouchard as the main facilitator from the back end (though still need him for his shot out there)

I'm quite upset about Barrie being the sacrificial lamb but his name being thrown out there in the Karlsson rumors merely meant writing was on the wall....

Going to need some more depth forwards after this trade....



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818750 is a reply to message #818749 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 1889
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

1 Cup

Love the trade as long as he stays healthy. Losing Barrie hurts though


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818751 is a reply to message #818750 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NZ Oiler Fan  is currently offline NZ Oiler Fan
Messages: 899
Registered: October 2006
Location: Kensington, PEI

No Cups

Flames fans dislike this trade. That's all the approval I need.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818755 is a reply to message #818749 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3913
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

kungpaobenji27 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:18

Bouchard's lateral skating isn't what it needs to be on the PP....maybe even less effective than Klefbom. At this rate, I'd rather see Nuge quarterbacking the PP from the blue line than having Bouchard as the main facilitator from the back end (though still need him for his shot out there)




I agree about Bouchard.. his deficiency for PP QB is his lack of lateral mobility along the blueline.. Barrie was very mobile and positionally savvy on the PP.

I think Ekholm now becomes our best Defenseman.. (emphasis on defence)



[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 16:40]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818759 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 16:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NCREDiBLE  is currently offline NCREDiBLE
Messages: 234
Registered: February 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB

No Cups

I like the trade only thing I wish was that it was Ceci moved over Barrie but it makes sense as we need to see what Bouchard is capable of.

If he can’t do it, we move him in a deal next year.
Honestly playing on a power play like ours, it’s a pretty big gift.

Ekholm means less mins for Nurse which will help Nurse out a lot.
Another 20+ min d man here finally!

We weren’t getting Bedard so heck with the first I wanna win.

I’m worried about the off season contracts tho, Kostin, Mcleod and Bouchard.
We need to move some more $$$



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818760 is a reply to message #818759 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Red Rage  is currently offline Red Rage
Messages: 66
Registered: June 2002
Location: ETOWN

No Cups

1.5 thumbs up for Holland!

Yes, I do not like losing Barrie, QB on the #1 PP in the league
Yes, I believe we gave up quite a bit of futures

BUT

We gave up less than Tampa for Jeannot
We gave up less than Boston for Orlov

And we got EXACTLY the DMan we need for the playoffs now, AND for the rest of the McDrai era.

WIN!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818761 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NCREDiBLE  is currently offline NCREDiBLE
Messages: 234
Registered: February 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB

No Cups

Will Ekholm play tomorrow for us against the Leafs? Dubas went all out on that team.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818762 is a reply to message #818761 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7642
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

NCREDiBLE wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:12

Will Ekholm play tomorrow for us against the Leafs? Dubas went all out on that team.

Flying from Nashville to Edmonton is a total pain when Westjet and Flair (lol) aren't flying direct in the summer. Hopefully they're smart enough to get a private plane to Toronto ASAP. I assume they'd fly mostly commercial when they're changing teams.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818763 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3913
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

Thinking about Barrie.. big loss. but might have been a good move to use Barrie in a trade now.. he's having a good season statistically .. and probably at peak market value.. probably would have been one of the top options to trade to lower team cap this summer anyway.. could be good timing.. Receiving a true No.1 defensive D-man who can skate and move the puck.. plus he's 6'-4" and a cycle-killer.

My view on Schaeffer prior to this trade was he could go either way as a prospect.. his success in the NHL is unknown.. he had some periods of no production this year.. in a league where he is larger than most of his peers.. or.. he could turn into the next Tom Wilson.. but either way he was not likely useable on the roster for up to 2 years plus..

Hopefully the 1st this year will be low if this team has any success in the playoffs..

[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 17:22]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818764 is a reply to message #818763 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NCREDiBLE  is currently offline NCREDiBLE
Messages: 234
Registered: February 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB

No Cups

I agree it was great to sell high on Barrie.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818765 is a reply to message #818764 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9640
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

NCREDiBLE wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:34

I agree it was great to sell high on Barrie.


Is that sell high value? Our 1st round pick from 2022, another 1st and we get 32 year old with 4x6M left.

I think barrie is just a toss in for the cap to work here. If a team was desperate for a PP QB, we should be getting a 1st for Barrie.

Oh well though, guess it is what it is. We need a competent defensive guy with Ceci not coming close to his last seasons play and Kulak struggling a lot. Hopefully Ekholm can create a stable pair with Bouch



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818767 is a reply to message #818765 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7642
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:35

NCREDiBLE wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:34

I agree it was great to sell high on Barrie.


Is that sell high value? Our 1st round pick from 2022, another 1st and we get 32 year old with 4x6M left.

I think barrie is just a toss in for the cap to work here. If a team was desperate for a PP QB, we should be getting a 1st for Barrie.

Oh well though, guess it is what it is. We need a competent defensive guy with Ceci not coming close to his last seasons play and Kulak struggling a lot. Hopefully Ekholm can create a stable pair with Bouch

Selling high for the Oilers is not having to give up a pick or getting more than a longshot Finnish prospect back. I agree with what you're saying.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818768 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
oilfan94  is currently offline oilfan94
Messages: 344
Registered: June 2006
Location: USA

No Cups

So I admit, I've never paid much attention to Ekholm. How good is he really? Point production has fallen a bit this season, and he is playing less time than any other season since 2016 (though still at nearly 22 per game right now). At 32 I worry if he drops off a cliff as early as next season.

That said, I see people saying a lot of good things on here. So is it just that he bring a shutdown factor? Or is he one of the best shutdown defenders in the league? I just want to like this trade as much as others here, but I liked Barrie a lot, so maybe is why I feel so disappointed.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818769 is a reply to message #818768 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9640
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

oilfan94 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:38

So I admit, I've never paid much attention to Ekholm. How good is he really? Point production has fallen a bit this season, and he is playing less time than any other season since 2016 (though still at nearly 22 per game right now). At 32 I worry if he drops off a cliff as early as next season.

That said, I see people saying a lot of good things on here. So is it just that he bring a shutdown factor? Or is he one of the best shutdown defenders in the league? I just want to like this trade as much as others here, but I liked Barrie a lot, so maybe is why I feel so disappointed.


Looked at his stats a bit. He's been playing with Carrier who has abysmal results away from Ekholm. So he's basically been carrying a pretty weak D on his back this season. I think he's a passable guy moving the puck and plays a pretty reliable defensive game. Probably checks off the boxes Holland was looking for. We're probably panicking quite a bit about poor defensive play these days. Hopefully this does help.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818770 is a reply to message #818765 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6829
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:35

NCREDiBLE wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:34

I agree it was great to sell high on Barrie.


Is that sell high value? Our 1st round pick from 2022, another 1st and we get 32 year old with 4x6M left.

I think barrie is just a toss in for the cap to work here. If a team was desperate for a PP QB, we should be getting a 1st for Barrie.

Oh well though, guess it is what it is. We need a competent defensive guy with Ceci not coming close to his last seasons play and Kulak struggling a lot. Hopefully Ekholm can create a stable pair with Bouch


As far as a Holland trade goes, it ain’t bad. He could have done so much worse.

That said we are short a wing now. So he still has time to bleep this up.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818771 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 17:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9640
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

I really don't think we need to panic about the PP. Barrie can look flashy darting side to side, like an amazing flopping around Mike Smith save that other goalies would have made look boring, but the PP has been run 95% by 3 players for years now. The D just needs to exist for the most part and not make dumb plays. Even Nurse did fine there when needed

From @Woodguy55

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqF-XH5acAEA_ss?format=png&name=small

The PP success lives and dies by McDrai being on their game, and that's basically it. We had a terrible run of PP suck last year, but Barrie didn't help, and he was taken off for other guys hoping it would help for a while while we waited for McDrai to get it together again. The D rotation didn't help much, no one there really mattered, until the big 3 figured things out again.

If by some miracle Bouch can finally add a bomb shot to the PP that we haven't had forever, bonus. But all he really has to do is be able to pass to open guys on either side of him and take obvious shot opportunities. Nuge and McDrai handle the rest.

[Updated on: Tue, 28 February 2023 17:50]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818772 is a reply to message #818770 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 18:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rutuu  is currently offline Rutuu
Messages: 106
Registered: March 2011
Location: Brisbane

No Cups

Is the 1st top 10 protected? A McDavid injury could be one of those tail risk events that always seems to hit this club right when we think we're moving forward.

Like the deal, but just have this shred of, "oh no, Holland got arrogant and didn't think of this" lurking in my mind.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818774 is a reply to message #818726 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 18:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1525
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

Losing Barrie causes me zero concern.
While he was better this year than last, defensively, that isn't saying much. He still was the cause of a LOT of chances against, even when his minutes are protected.
5 V 5 he didnt drive any offence or move the puck terribly well.

The key is the PP and I think that will be just fine as well for a number of reasons;
- his spot is called the QB but that PP didnt run through him at all. It runs through McDavid being a duel threat, Drai's ability to finish at a high rate and the net front/puck retrieval of Hyman.
- The main purpose of that spot, with the current strategy, is to be the between pass wen working the puck from one side to the other, waiting for the lane to open up for the seem pass. His lateral movement is good but it doesn't effect much given the quality of passing from the left and right board spots.
- Barrie is also good at getting the shot through when the PK tries to spread the top coverage wider to cut down the cross pass.

Bouchard (or even Nurse) can accomplish those things to a similar degree. I also think Bouchard has a better shot than Barrie so it could actually HELP the PP having another threat up there.
Worst case scenario you can move RNH back there and put Kane in the bumper spot. a 5 forward PP would be good times until the other team got the puck and broke out of the zone.

I like the trade overall as they swapped out a D for a D and should be improved in their own end.
Now to get the wing holes sorted out...



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818778 is a reply to message #818768 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 19:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 1889
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

1 Cup

oilfan94 wrote on Wed, 01 March 2023 00:38

So I admit, I've never paid much attention to Ekholm. How good is he really? Point production has fallen a bit this season, and he is playing less time than any other season since 2016 (though still at nearly 22 per game right now). At 32 I worry if he drops off a cliff as early as next season.

That said, I see people saying a lot of good things on here. So is it just that he bring a shutdown factor? Or is he one of the best shutdown defenders in the league? I just want to like this trade as much as others here, but I liked Barrie a lot, so maybe is why I feel so disappointed.

He’s a very good player but he does get injured inthink from time to time. I’m hoping he can stay healthy for us. If he can do that, he greatly improves this defense



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818780 is a reply to message #818761 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 19:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Suomalainen  is currently offline Suomalainen
Messages: 680
Registered: May 2002
Location: Boulder, CO

No Cups

NCREDiBLE wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 17:12

Will Ekholm play tomorrow for us against the Leafs? Dubas went all out on that team.


Looks like he'll make it
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/CYO601/history/20230301/ 1400Z/KBNA/CYEG



97.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818783 is a reply to message #818741 ]
Tue, 28 February 2023 20:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bigEfromGP  is currently offline bigEfromGP
Messages: 813
Registered: July 2006
Location: GP, AB

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:02

nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.


Gonna take a bet that the PP will be fine. It was tops in the league before Barrie got here. Always scored fine even when Nurse had to fill in. Maybe little growing pain for Bouch, but we really don't ask that much of the D for the PP. Just to not screw up and lose the puck. Honestly we should have been using him there more already to prepare for Barrie inevitably leaving.


I agree completely. The greatest PP is not going to all of sudden become useless because Tyson Barrie isn't on it.



CrusaderPi wrote on Fri, 09 October 2020 13:17

CrudeRemarks wrote on Fri, 09 October 2020 13:00

The president thinks he has the ideal male body.
It's hard to disagree that he has the ideal male body.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818787 is a reply to message #818778 ]
Wed, 01 March 2023 04:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NZ Oiler Fan  is currently offline NZ Oiler Fan
Messages: 899
Registered: October 2006
Location: Kensington, PEI

No Cups

tardigrade81 wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 22:35

oilfan94 wrote on Wed, 01 March 2023 00:38

So I admit, I've never paid much attention to Ekholm. How good is he really? Point production has fallen a bit this season, and he is playing less time than any other season since 2016 (though still at nearly 22 per game right now). At 32 I worry if he drops off a cliff as early as next season.

That said, I see people saying a lot of good things on here. So is it just that he bring a shutdown factor? Or is he one of the best shutdown defenders in the league? I just want to like this trade as much as others here, but I liked Barrie a lot, so maybe is why I feel so disappointed.

He’s a very good player but he does get injured inthink from time to time. I’m hoping he can stay healthy for us. If he can do that, he greatly improves this defense


Missed 20 games over 9 seasons. That doesn't seem too bad to me.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818792 is a reply to message #818774 ]
Wed, 01 March 2023 09:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3705
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Between Ekholm and Chychrun, I think for who else the Oilers have for dmen, Ekholm is the better fit. The Oilers need guys to help keep the puck out of the net. Eklhom is bigger, meaner, more physical, has more experience both in season and the playoffs, more durable and has a much better and longer track record of being a better defender than Chychurn. He plays on the PK a lot, has played a shut down role a ton over the years. Plus he moves the puck pretty well, maybe not quite as offensive as Chychurn but has some offense and moves decent. Plus he's DIFFERENT than what the Oilers have a ton of. He's a bit older than Chyrchrun but I think he brings way more of what the Oilers badly need.

I look at why Desharnais has come up and stood out so much. Sure he looks like a decent player but he does different things that most of the Oilers defense don't and quite frankly some lack. I think Chychurn would have been fine, he's a good player, maybe does a few things better than a few others but I see him having more of the same of what the Oilers have lots of. Losing Barrie is a loss in that he was great on the PP but the loss I think is more so in the room as he was tight was McD and Leon and seen as one of the key guys for the mood of the room. But at the same time, Eklhom is supposed to be a really good guy and maybe it's a little too chummy in that room. This is about winning hockey games, not hanging out with your buddies.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 March 2023 09:30]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818798 is a reply to message #818740 ]
Wed, 01 March 2023 10:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2827
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:00

nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.

Bouchard becomes Barrie? I think the PP might take a hit, but that becomes less valuable as the year goes on.

Nuge better be ready with the boots when Bouch falls asleep on the keep in.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Ekholm trade [message #818808 is a reply to message #818798 ]
Wed, 01 March 2023 13:15 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 927
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

No Cups

K.McC#24 wrote on Wed, 01 March 2023 09:51

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 16:00

nullterm wrote on Tue, 28 February 2023 15:59

We're overall better team, but our PP just took a big hit. Now depending on Bouchard or Nurse to step up.

Bouchard becomes Barrie? I think the PP might take a hit, but that becomes less valuable as the year goes on.

Nuge better be ready with the boots when Bouch falls asleep on the keep in.


Or shoots it straight into a PK forward's shinguard and it bounces out of the zone.



Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

Pages (2): [1  2  >  »]  
Previous Topic:Pregame: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1)
Next Topic:Pre-series thread Kings (3) @ Oilers (2)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca