This day on April 23
None

Happy Birthday To: Ramone, Giant Moo, mogal, booyaka!, Blue Thunder, BDR1

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1)Pages (2): [ «  <  1  2]
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842949 is a reply to message #842948 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 01:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1076
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

Knoblauch is either winning a cup or getting fired this summer. Nothing in between. Bad decision after bad decision, but McDavid almost saved his skin. Could have easily been Paul Coffey coming out in the 3rd period as new head coach.

Skinner… is either about to go on a tear as he usually does after 2/3 awful games or you need to ride Pickard. The whole team spent the whole game waking up realizing they are in the playoffs, but he wasn’t holding the team in while they did.

Oilers are the Schrödinger's cat of the playoffs, you have no idea if you are opening a box to a live or dead cat.

No panic yet. If they pull out a game 2 win in LA we’re rolling.

[Updated on: Tue, 22 April 2025 01:15]


Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842945 is a reply to message #842875 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 00:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim is currently online Skookum Jim
Messages: 4797
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Who comes out for Kane[ 11 vote(s) ]
1.Arvedsson 1 / 9%
2.J. Skinner 7 / 64%
3.C. Brown 2 / 18%
4.Janmark 1 / 9%

Refs + Skinner = Loss

J. Skinner, Arvedsson, who goes out if Kane comes in?

Arvedsson.. too small and slow.. Skinner same.. but more agile..




McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842946 is a reply to message #842945 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 00:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7348
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Who should come out? Janmark, notwithstanding the goal tonight. He had 2 goals all season before that, with only one past an actual goalie.

However, it's Knoblauch, so he'll keep his meat-and-potatoes guy in, and he'll bench Jeff Skinner despite all his hot play down the stretch.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842950 is a reply to message #842945 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 01:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1076
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

Skookum Jim wrote on Mon, 21 April 2025 23:03

Refs + Skinner = Loss

J. Skinner, Arvedsson, who goes out if Kane comes in?

Arvedsson.. too small and slow.. Skinner same.. but more agile..




I voted Skinner. He’s shown nothing and maybe the wrong guy against the Kings. Maybe next series. Arved atleast had some decent looks around the net.



Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842954 is a reply to message #842875 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5922
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

First game back for a few of our minute munchers which, IMO, results in what we saw the first 40 minutes.

Love Walmans game. That delay of game call was a joke.

Stuart is trash laterally has the reflexes of my 7yo. Bouch a defensive liability due to being scared to take a hit so he continues to serve up grade A premium steaks for opponents. JSkins weak board play, can see him being called Eberle by Oilers MSM soon… I think he’s the one that sits for Kane Friday night.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842958 is a reply to message #842875 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 09:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rocksteady  is currently offline Rocksteady
Messages: 541
Registered: March 2007

No Cups

I thought offensively Bouchard was great. Defensively? Eeesh, that 40 seconds left in the 3rd goal against he can't let two guys in.

Stu is scary, a really... scary. Shell of his former self.

I turned it off when it was 4-0 and came back when it was 5-5.

As a team, they are better than the kings but Stu isn't.



The very definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing expecting different results.

Generally Disappointed.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842961 is a reply to message #842958 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 09:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7348
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 09:27

I thought offensively Bouchard was great. Defensively? Eeesh, that 40 seconds left in the 3rd goal against he can't let two guys in.

Stu is scary, a really... scary. Shell of his former self.

I turned it off when it was 4-0 and came back when it was 5-5.

As a team, they are better than the kings but Stu isn't.


Bouchard had some bad moments last night, and that giveaway on the third goal was pretty awful. We had a lot of bad moments from defence last night though. Brown was awful leading up to Kulak's penalty, and even worse defending on the PP. Walman's penalty to put us down 5-on-3 was stupid. I like an amount of aggression (and argue that the referees sure ignored some absolute tackles in front of LA's net), but if you use your stick to grate the guy's neck and chin, it's going to get called more often than not. It was a stunning lack of composure that cost us a goal against. While he was unlucky on the over-the-glass penalty and while there may have been an argument it clipped glass, it still was a stupid play. He has time, he's not pressured, and he just completely misplays the puck when he could have probably even skated it out if he'd wanted.

I do think that the distribution of minutes for the d-men wasn't helpful. If Bouchard is playing half the game, he's probably going to feel some fatigue and that's going to put us at risk. If the 5th and 6th guys barely see the ice, they're not going to get any rhythym and they're going to be more scared of making a mistake when they do finally go out there.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842970 is a reply to message #842961 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 10:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2981
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

Hard to say who comes out. I won't sit and pretend like I would know what to do with the line is and who to take out for Kane. We put up more than enough goals last night to win the game. The defense sh it the bed completely, and Skinner let in a couple real soft goals. I still believe if Pickard was in net we win that game. See what happens in game two, but if Skinner starts and blows it again, Knobs job might be on the hot seat. Skinner did not look good last night, as many of us predicted. No reason not to go with Pick for game 2. He can't get any worse. Giving up 6 goals is as bad as it gets


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842986 is a reply to message #842961 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 12:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rocksteady  is currently offline Rocksteady
Messages: 541
Registered: March 2007

No Cups

Adam wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 09:36

I do think that the distribution of minutes for the d-men wasn't helpful. If Bouchard is playing half the game, he's probably going to feel some fatigue and that's going to put us at risk. If the 5th and 6th guys barely see the ice, they're not going to get any rhythym and they're going to be more scared of making a mistake when they do finally go out there.


Clearly Knoblauch and Coffey don't have much faith in their 5th and 6th with Brown getting just under 5 ice time? That's pretty weak confidence (I'm not saying they are wrong) It looks like the cupboards are bare? The defensive corps is missing Ekholm in the worst way and I know a playoff contending team don't want draft picks but you gotta have something in reserve, no?



The very definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing expecting different results.

Generally Disappointed.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842987 is a reply to message #842986 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 13:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5922
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 12:59

Adam wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 09:36

I do think that the distribution of minutes for the d-men wasn't helpful. If Bouchard is playing half the game, he's probably going to feel some fatigue and that's going to put us at risk. If the 5th and 6th guys barely see the ice, they're not going to get any rhythym and they're going to be more scared of making a mistake when they do finally go out there.


Clearly Knoblauch and Coffey don't have much faith in their 5th and 6th with Brown getting just under 5 ice time? That's pretty weak confidence (I'm not saying they are wrong) It looks like the cupboards are bare? The defensive corps is missing Ekholm in the worst way and I know a playoff contending team don't want draft picks but you gotta have something in reserve, no?



Klingberg will be in tomorrow, Brown out. There will be a little more faith in the bottom pair with Klingberg back



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842988 is a reply to message #842987 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 14:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7348
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 13:42

Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 12:59

Adam wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 09:36

I do think that the distribution of minutes for the d-men wasn't helpful. If Bouchard is playing half the game, he's probably going to feel some fatigue and that's going to put us at risk. If the 5th and 6th guys barely see the ice, they're not going to get any rhythym and they're going to be more scared of making a mistake when they do finally go out there.


Clearly Knoblauch and Coffey don't have much faith in their 5th and 6th with Brown getting just under 5 ice time? That's pretty weak confidence (I'm not saying they are wrong) It looks like the cupboards are bare? The defensive corps is missing Ekholm in the worst way and I know a playoff contending team don't want draft picks but you gotta have something in reserve, no?



Klingberg will be in tomorrow, Brown out. There will be a little more faith in the bottom pair with Klingberg back


Klingberg? Really? I thought he was done?



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842990 is a reply to message #842988 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 15:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim is currently online Skookum Jim
Messages: 4797
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Adam wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 13:41

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 13:42

Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 12:59

Adam wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 09:36

I do think that the distribution of minutes for the d-men wasn't helpful. If Bouchard is playing half the game, he's probably going to feel some fatigue and that's going to put us at risk. If the 5th and 6th guys barely see the ice, they're not going to get any rhythym and they're going to be more scared of making a mistake when they do finally go out there.


Clearly Knoblauch and Coffey don't have much faith in their 5th and 6th with Brown getting just under 5 ice time? That's pretty weak confidence (I'm not saying they are wrong) It looks like the cupboards are bare? The defensive corps is missing Ekholm in the worst way and I know a playoff contending team don't want draft picks but you gotta have something in reserve, no?



Klingberg will be in tomorrow, Brown out. There will be a little more faith in the bottom pair with Klingberg back


Klingberg? Really? I thought he was done?


Knob said he was good to go a few days ago.. surprised he put Brown in.. who was ranked much lower on everyone's scale than apparently the defensive coaching staff.. bizarrely



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842992 is a reply to message #842986 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 15:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim is currently online Skookum Jim
Messages: 4797
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 11:59



Clearly Knoblauch and Coffey don't have much faith in their 5th and 6th with Brown getting just under 5 ice time? That's pretty weak confidence (I'm not saying they are wrong) It looks like the cupboards are bare? The defensive corps is missing Ekholm in the worst way and I know a playoff contending team don't want draft picks but you gotta have something in reserve, no?




Get Roman Jossi in the off season.. pair him with a freshly repaired Ekholm for 3 years..



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842977 is a reply to message #842875 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 11:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rowan Oil Fielding  is currently offline Rowan Oil Fielding
Messages: 361
Registered: July 2018

No Cups

Skinner last night.
https://i.postimg.cc/tCxYsYgf/goalkeeper-toddler-1.gif
https://i.postimg.cc/Gmn9Gd8p/ezgif-6e6e3dd7044465-COM-WORDS-gif.webp



https://i.postimg.cc/mZ9GD3V6/php2-CH3-Yf-AM.jpg

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842979 is a reply to message #842977 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 11:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2981
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

Rowan Oil Fielding wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 18:15

Skinner last night.
https://i.postimg.cc/tCxYsYgf/goalkeeper-toddler-1.gif
https://i.postimg.cc/Gmn9Gd8p/ezgif-6e6e3dd7044465-COM-WORDS-gif.webp

Lmao yup

He did have one good save in the third. That split save. But otherwise it was bad



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842989 is a reply to message #842875 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 15:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim is currently online Skookum Jim
Messages: 4797
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

IMHO our goal tending problems have all come down to pro-scouting at the position.. whoever that might have been, and currently is.

GM's have a point about acquiring proven top 10 starters.. don't have the trade capital nor the cap room to get them.. but there are a lot of starters currently in the league that used to be other team's throwaways.. and got them very cheap.. someone on their side knew something Oilers don't .. solve that and you can start moving forward.. goalies are voodoo.. take Binnington.. he was on fire.. won a Cup.. then a dog.. now he's back.. ?? Stu has most of the physical attributes you want.. namely size.. there is always the hope he moves up a tier.. but he's not agile.. he relies on blocking and process.. looks too methodical.. lower on reaction, instinct or flow.. the really good goalies have both method and reaction..

Even our prospects look underwhelming.. except for the Jonsson kid in the SHL..

Oilers should have an entire goalie "department" analyzing their own goalies and others .. shouldn't be left to one voice/opinion.. just a thought.

[Updated on: Tue, 22 April 2025 15:03]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842991 is a reply to message #842875 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 15:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim is currently online Skookum Jim
Messages: 4797
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Pickard or Stu?[ 8 vote(s) ]
1.Stu 4 / 50%
2.Pickard 1 / 13%
3... call up Dwayne Roloson.. 1 / 13%
4.Shooter Tutor 1 / 13%
5... gotta hit a post.. 1 / 13%

Who'd you put in?

[Updated on: Tue, 22 April 2025 15:13]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842995 is a reply to message #842991 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 17:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2981
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

Skinner will go tomorrow. Trusting he will be better


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842996 is a reply to message #842995 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 17:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim is currently online Skookum Jim
Messages: 4797
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

tardigrade81 wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 16:08

Skinner will go tomorrow. Trusting he will be better


we'll need 5 goals minimum.



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842997 is a reply to message #842996 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 18:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 758
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 17:24

tardigrade81 wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 16:08

Skinner will go tomorrow. Trusting he will be better


we'll need 5 goals minimum.

Anyone know any Kings fans? I wonder who they are hoping is in net for the Oilers.

I think we all know.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1) [message #842998 is a reply to message #842995 ]
Tue, 22 April 2025 19:23 Go to previous message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 11353
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

tardigrade81 wrote on Tue, 22 April 2025 17:08

Skinner will go tomorrow. Trusting he will be better


Everyone starts the game on time and we should have a great chance.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

Pages (2): [ «  <  1  2]  
Previous Topic:Round 1 vs LA Part IV
Next Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #1)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca