This day on April 30
Acquired: Bryan Muir (1996)

Happy Birthday To: oilfan351, CaptainBucky, Oilersfanatic6, oilers80s, Molsonmagneto, uglyoil

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3)
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843280]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:30 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1755
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

4
7
Final

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win:   100%
Los Angeles to win:   0%
11 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843305 is a reply to message #843280 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2933
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5f/MA_Route_15.svg/500px-MA_Route_15.svg.png


#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843309 is a reply to message #843305 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 3102
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

3 Cups

We did it boys. Holy crap that was tense !!!


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843319 is a reply to message #843305 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1481
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Great job staying with it by Pickard!!! Those saves in the last minute more than make up for that stinker.

So having a total of only 13 seconds of PP time and going 2-2 has to be some sort of record I would think.

Great games by Arvidsson, Kane, Brown. Klingberg didn’t look too bad.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843320 is a reply to message #843305 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 8011
Registered: December 2003
Location: Downtown Edmonton

6 Cups

Never in doubt.


Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843310 is a reply to message #843280 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1099
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

In Pickard we trust.


Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843313 is a reply to message #843310 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 3102
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

3 Cups

Keep rolling with Pickard. He was rock solid those last few minutes. That was awesome


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843318 is a reply to message #843310 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Leia  is currently offline Leia
Messages: 441
Registered: May 2003
Location: England

No Cups

Dang it, I said in the pre-game I felt a Connor Brown hat-trick, but I'll settle for two goals from him in that win. Now keep going on Sunday, give them the blow out like they did us in game 2.




Take me home, country road
to the place where I belong
to Alberta, to see the Oilers
take me home, country road

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843312 is a reply to message #843280 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rowan Oil Fielding  is currently offline Rowan Oil Fielding
Messages: 390
Registered: July 2018

No Cups

Great win for the good guys. Sometimes virtue and heroism triumphs over evil and tyranny!


https://i.postimg.cc/mZ9GD3V6/php2-CH3-Yf-AM.jpg

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843314 is a reply to message #843280 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 11474
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843321 is a reply to message #843314 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 835
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

They called one(!) penalty on LA in that game. Nice of their coach to give us one.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843322 is a reply to message #843321 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1481
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Jay wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 02:01

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

They called one(!) penalty on LA in that game. Nice of their coach to give us one.


Absolutely criminal they were only called once. So many blatant infractions right in front of them. But then they call that crap interference on Walman and the call on Kane? FOH



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843334 is a reply to message #843314 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 09:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 8011
Registered: December 2003
Location: Downtown Edmonton

6 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

I liked the coach rolling the dice on the goalie interference call. If the league decides to rule in favor of the Kings, which is always possible, the series could have been won right then and there.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843336 is a reply to message #843334 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 10:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1481
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

CrusaderPi wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:50

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

I liked the coach rolling the dice on the goalie interference call. If the league decides to rule in favor of the Kings, which is always possible, the series could have been won right then and there.


I agree. I’ve seen a lot more/less to screw the Oilers. Kessler prying open Talbot’s pads, all good. Forget who it was skating across the ice not in the crease, goalie stuck his glove hand out (which our play rubbed on the way by), yup - goaltender interference.

So like you say - they risked game 3 for at best a 50/50 challenge, but if it goes their way, maybe that is series over.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843338 is a reply to message #843336 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 11:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 11474
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Mike wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:14

CrusaderPi wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:50

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

I liked the coach rolling the dice on the goalie interference call. If the league decides to rule in favor of the Kings, which is always possible, the series could have been won right then and there.


I agree. I’ve seen a lot more/less to screw the Oilers. Kessler prying open Talbot’s pads, all good. Forget who it was skating across the ice not in the crease, goalie stuck his glove hand out (which our play rubbed on the way by), yup - goaltender interference.

So like you say - they risked game 3 for at best a 50/50 challenge, but if it goes their way, maybe that is series over.


Seemed more like a 1/100 challenge. There was nothing there. Were they just hoping all the conspiracies were true and the league wanted the kings to win no matter what? That would have been the 1 out of 100 I guess.

How many times in the series did the kings quickly score back on us after the game was tied? I would have had a little more confidence in my group. Instead he kneecapped them.

[Updated on: Sat, 26 April 2025 11:08]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843339 is a reply to message #843338 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 11:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 835
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 11:06

Mike wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:14

CrusaderPi wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:50

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

I liked the coach rolling the dice on the goalie interference call. If the league decides to rule in favor of the Kings, which is always possible, the series could have been won right then and there.


I agree. I’ve seen a lot more/less to screw the Oilers. Kessler prying open Talbot’s pads, all good. Forget who it was skating across the ice not in the crease, goalie stuck his glove hand out (which our play rubbed on the way by), yup - goaltender interference.

So like you say - they risked game 3 for at best a 50/50 challenge, but if it goes their way, maybe that is series over.


Seemed more like a 1/100 challenge. There was nothing there. Were they just hoping all the conspiracies were true and the league wanted the kings to win no matter what? That would have been the 1 out of 100 I guess.

How many times in the series did the kings quickly score back on us after the game was tied? I would have had a little more confidence in my group. Instead he kneecapped them.

1/100...but it was Evander Kane and that's why he made the challenge. The odds of Kane getting any benefit of the doubt in that situation bumps the odds of a successful challenge to at least 50/50. If its any other oiler no chance they challenge.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843341 is a reply to message #843339 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 12:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 11474
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Jay wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 11:30

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 11:06

Mike wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:14

CrusaderPi wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:50

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

I liked the coach rolling the dice on the goalie interference call. If the league decides to rule in favor of the Kings, which is always possible, the series could have been won right then and there.


I agree. I’ve seen a lot more/less to screw the Oilers. Kessler prying open Talbot’s pads, all good. Forget who it was skating across the ice not in the crease, goalie stuck his glove hand out (which our play rubbed on the way by), yup - goaltender interference.

So like you say - they risked game 3 for at best a 50/50 challenge, but if it goes their way, maybe that is series over.


Seemed more like a 1/100 challenge. There was nothing there. Were they just hoping all the conspiracies were true and the league wanted the kings to win no matter what? That would have been the 1 out of 100 I guess.

How many times in the series did the kings quickly score back on us after the game was tied? I would have had a little more confidence in my group. Instead he kneecapped them.

1/100...but it was Evander Kane and that's why he made the challenge. The odds of Kane getting any benefit of the doubt in that situation bumps the odds of a successful challenge to at least 50/50. If its any other oiler no chance they challenge.


I think this league is ridiculous, but I’m not sure if they would go to those lengths to make it clear to the whole world. There was nothing to grab onto in that replay. He’s pushed into the crease. Slight skate touch but it had zero affect on the goalie. The goalie then jumps completely away from Kane for a desperation save attempt and is just lying on the ice untouched by anyone and the puck bounces around 5 times before being shot in.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843344 is a reply to message #843341 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 13:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 8011
Registered: December 2003
Location: Downtown Edmonton

6 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:36

Jay wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 11:30

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 11:06

Mike wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:14

CrusaderPi wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:50

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

I liked the coach rolling the dice on the goalie interference call. If the league decides to rule in favor of the Kings, which is always possible, the series could have been won right then and there.


I agree. I’ve seen a lot more/less to screw the Oilers. Kessler prying open Talbot’s pads, all good. Forget who it was skating across the ice not in the crease, goalie stuck his glove hand out (which our play rubbed on the way by), yup - goaltender interference.

So like you say - they risked game 3 for at best a 50/50 challenge, but if it goes their way, maybe that is series over.


Seemed more like a 1/100 challenge. There was nothing there. Were they just hoping all the conspiracies were true and the league wanted the kings to win no matter what? That would have been the 1 out of 100 I guess.

How many times in the series did the kings quickly score back on us after the game was tied? I would have had a little more confidence in my group. Instead he kneecapped them.

1/100...but it was Evander Kane and that's why he made the challenge. The odds of Kane getting any benefit of the doubt in that situation bumps the odds of a successful challenge to at least 50/50. If its any other oiler no chance they challenge.


I think this league is ridiculous, but I’m not sure if they would go to those lengths to make it clear to the whole world. There was nothing to grab onto in that replay. He’s pushed into the crease. Slight skate touch but it had zero affect on the goalie. The goalie then jumps completely away from Kane for a desperation save attempt and is just lying on the ice untouched by anyone and the puck bounces around 5 times before being shot in.

You said it yourself, he was in the crease. The skate touched the goalie. The goalie reacted (and could never reset). The league is intentionally opaque about this stuff because it's impossible to make tight enough rules to cover all things that could happen in a hockey game.

It was a 25/100 challenge. The biggest factor, if you believe the NHL fully manages games and seasons, is their want for a 5th game over McDavid being eliminated in 4.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843348 is a reply to message #843344 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 16:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 11474
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 13:31

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:36

Jay wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 11:30

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 11:06

Mike wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:14

CrusaderPi wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 12:50

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:57

Kings let that one get away. What a huge error by their coach on that challenge. Nice to see them finally show weakness.

Hopefully a big turning point! Let’s get the next one.

I liked the coach rolling the dice on the goalie interference call. If the league decides to rule in favor of the Kings, which is always possible, the series could have been won right then and there.


I agree. I’ve seen a lot more/less to screw the Oilers. Kessler prying open Talbot’s pads, all good. Forget who it was skating across the ice not in the crease, goalie stuck his glove hand out (which our play rubbed on the way by), yup - goaltender interference.

So like you say - they risked game 3 for at best a 50/50 challenge, but if it goes their way, maybe that is series over.


Seemed more like a 1/100 challenge. There was nothing there. Were they just hoping all the conspiracies were true and the league wanted the kings to win no matter what? That would have been the 1 out of 100 I guess.

How many times in the series did the kings quickly score back on us after the game was tied? I would have had a little more confidence in my group. Instead he kneecapped them.

1/100...but it was Evander Kane and that's why he made the challenge. The odds of Kane getting any benefit of the doubt in that situation bumps the odds of a successful challenge to at least 50/50. If its any other oiler no chance they challenge.


I think this league is ridiculous, but I’m not sure if they would go to those lengths to make it clear to the whole world. There was nothing to grab onto in that replay. He’s pushed into the crease. Slight skate touch but it had zero affect on the goalie. The goalie then jumps completely away from Kane for a desperation save attempt and is just lying on the ice untouched by anyone and the puck bounces around 5 times before being shot in.

You said it yourself, he was in the crease. The skate touched the goalie. The goalie reacted (and could never reset). The league is intentionally opaque about this stuff because it's impossible to make tight enough rules to cover all things that could happen in a hockey game.

It was a 25/100 challenge. The biggest factor, if you believe the NHL fully manages games and seasons, is their want for a 5th game over McDavid being eliminated in 4.


Bad sign for the league if coaches are gambling on league corruption going their way. I think only 1 fan base in the world would have agreed if they called that back and even half of those would blush if they had to say out loud why they thought it was legit to call it back for goalie interference.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843349 is a reply to message #843348 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 17:07 Go to previous message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 8011
Registered: December 2003
Location: Downtown Edmonton

6 Cups

[quote title=Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 16:23

Bad sign for the league if coaches are gambling on league corruption going their way. I think only 1 fan base in the world would have agreed if they called that back and even half of those would blush if they had to say out loud why they thought it was legit to call it back for goalie interference. [/quote]
How many baffling calls, suspensions, and goaltender interferences have we seen? It's less league corruption, more game management and NHL chaos theory.

To be clear, I wasn't worried that was going to be called back once I saw the overhead angle.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843317 is a reply to message #843280 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 22:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5937
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Pants flying over Whyte riiiiight aboooooout… now!


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843323 is a reply to message #843317 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 3102
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

3 Cups

Whiskey time!!!


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843324 is a reply to message #843323 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 835
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Kane is such a unicorn when he's healthy and going he can change games.


"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843325 is a reply to message #843324 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 11474
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Jay wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 23:10

Kane is such a unicorn when he's healthy and going he can change games.


In on both tying goals. Definitely huge game by Kane



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843327 is a reply to message #843325 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 3102
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

3 Cups

Agreed. It is damn good to have a healthy Kane back. He was magnificent


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843331 is a reply to message #843317 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 01:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4875
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 21:58

Pants flying over Whyte riiiiight aboooooout… now!


Hope you have another 15 pair.. you're gonna need em icon_nod



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843332 is a reply to message #843331 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 08:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5937
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 01:04

Oscargasm wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 21:58

Pants flying over Whyte riiiiight aboooooout… now!


Hope you have another 15 pair.. you're gonna need em icon_nod


Restocked after last spring. We good!



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843326 is a reply to message #843280 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cpcos  is currently offline cpcos
Messages: 47
Registered: March 2013

No Cups

Now who do you play in net next game….
I wouldn’t know….. seriously i wouldn’t!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843328 is a reply to message #843326 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1099
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

cpcos wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:18

Now who do you play in net next game….
I wouldn’t know….. seriously i wouldn’t!


You ride Pickard til the wheels fall off. They already fell off Skinner.



Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843329 is a reply to message #843328 ]
Fri, 25 April 2025 23:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 11474
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

nullterm wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 23:53

cpcos wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:18

Now who do you play in net next game….
I wouldn’t know….. seriously i wouldn’t!


You ride Pickard til the wheels fall off. They already fell off Skinner.


Picks let in 2 goals that we didn't tip top corner on him. That's decent. And he had to be dialed in the entire game. Last 2 games had long periods of the Kings backing off with big leads, but every time they cared to push again, just auto-goals against us.

Think you have to go Pickard too.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843330 is a reply to message #843329 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 00:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Leia  is currently offline Leia
Messages: 441
Registered: May 2003
Location: England

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 23:56

nullterm wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 23:53

cpcos wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:18

Now who do you play in net next game….
I wouldn’t know….. seriously i wouldn’t!


You ride Pickard til the wheels fall off. They already fell off Skinner.


Picks let in 2 goals that we didn't tip top corner on him. That's decent. And he had to be dialed in the entire game. Last 2 games had long periods of the Kings backing off with big leads, but every time they cared to push again, just auto-goals against us.

Think you have to go Pickard too.


I said after the last game we don't help our netminders, either someone wide open in front of the goal to pick the spot or deflections, I'm sure someone can find the stat, but I'd guess we've scored more goals on ourselves with tips and deflections than any other team in the league this year and most years.

I should add that I thought Fredric looked a bit better tonight, way off it in terms of where he should be, but certainly better than the last game. Shame he can't get to speed like Kane has.



Take me home, country road
to the place where I belong
to Alberta, to see the Oilers
take me home, country road

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843335 is a reply to message #843330 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 09:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 3102
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

3 Cups

As long as we start Pick we're good

If he started game one. We would be up in this series



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843340 is a reply to message #843335 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 11:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 835
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

tardigrade81 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 09:53

As long as we start Pick we're good


This isn't actually a conversation is it?



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843342 is a reply to message #843340 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 13:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4875
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Jay wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:33

tardigrade81 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 09:53

As long as we start Pick we're good


This isn't actually a conversation is it?


Pick is the Pick



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843343 is a reply to message #843342 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 13:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 11474
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 13:13

Jay wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:33

tardigrade81 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 09:53

As long as we start Pick we're good


This isn't actually a conversation is it?


Pick is the Pick


We finally gonna get serious about finding a starter this summer? McDavid should hold off his negotiations with us until we do.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843347 is a reply to message #843343 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 15:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2933
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 13:28

Skookum Jim wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 13:13

Jay wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 10:33

tardigrade81 wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 09:53

As long as we start Pick we're good


This isn't actually a conversation is it?


Pick is the Pick


We finally gonna get serious about finding a starter this summer? McDavid should hold off his negotiations with us until we do.

The look on his face on the bench after that chip shot indicates he’s frustrated.

Not to take away from his goalies effort. The Oilers bladed at least 2 of the goals that lifted past him.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3) [message #843337 is a reply to message #843330 ]
Sat, 26 April 2025 10:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2433
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Leia wrote on Sat, 26 April 2025 00:12

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 23:56

nullterm wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 23:53

cpcos wrote on Fri, 25 April 2025 22:18

Now who do you play in net next game….
I wouldn’t know….. seriously i wouldn’t!


You ride Pickard til the wheels fall off. They already fell off Skinner.


Picks let in 2 goals that we didn't tip top corner on him. That's decent. And he had to be dialed in the entire game. Last 2 games had long periods of the Kings backing off with big leads, but every time they cared to push again, just auto-goals against us.

Think you have to go Pickard too.


I said after the last game we don't help our netminders, either someone wide open in front of the goal to pick the spot or deflections, I'm sure someone can find the stat, but I'd guess we've scored more goals on ourselves with tips and deflections than any other team in the league this year and most years.

I should add that I thought Fredric looked a bit better tonight, way off it in terms of where he should be, but certainly better than the last game. Shame he can't get to speed like Kane has.


Difference being, Kane is healthy and Frederic is probably playoff eligible to skate.



Send a private message to this user  

 
Previous Topic:Pregame: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #4)
Next Topic:GDT: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #3)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca