4
0

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!

Edmonton to win: 0% Anaheim to win: 0% 0 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard

#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.

"Bah Gawd! Would somebody stop the damn draft!"

- Jim Ross calling the NHL Draft Lotto 2015 as the Oilers win

#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

[Updated on: Sun, 06 January 2019 21:07]

Only bad part of this game was when Henrique died after being pushed a bit



I know he's a Duck, and the Ducks suck, but you never wanna see someone get hurt like that.

"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on

CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Kr55 wrote on Sun, 06 January 2019 19:50

Only bad part of this game was when Henrique died after being pushed a bit I know he's a Duck, and the Ducks suck, but you never wanna see someone get hurt like that.

Hahahaha.

"Make the Oilers great again" - Donny Tramp

Kr55 wrote on Sun, 06 January 2019 19:50

Only bad part of this game was when Henrique died after being pushed a bit I know he's a Duck, and the Ducks suck, but you never wanna see someone get hurt like that.

About freaking time.
Next time I want to see that happen to Manson, then the Oilers will have arrived.

McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Kr55 wrote on Sun, 06 January 2019 19:50

Only bad part of this game was when Henrique died after being pushed a bit I know he's a Duck, and the Ducks suck, but you never wanna see someone get hurt like that.

Someone give Nurse the A off Lucic's chest. ( I know Looch had a better game, but one game an A does not make )

Illegitimi non carborundum.

"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Restored: "We're sucking hind banana here." - Pat Quinn, Jan 18, 2010

"...the Oilers have been rebuilding for so long that it’s hard not to be cynical." - NBC's Ryan Dadoun Jan 2, 2015

97.

[Updated on: Mon, 07 January 2019 09:02]

RDOilerfan wrote on Mon, 07 January 2019 08:00

Big win for the Oilers and a must have. They need another one. For the game, I really don't put a lot of stock into shots, I think the amount of good scoring chances are more important. The Oilers scored 4 goals, without Gibson being good, they easily have way more. I thought Talbot played really well but I felt the Oilers have more good scoring chances than the Ducks. When a team brings the puck into your zone and fires a long range shot at your goal that has little chance of going in. Yes that counts as a shot on goal and yes that is going to hurt your overall corsi because it is a shot attempt but does it mean much if it has next to no chance of going in? Not really in my opinion. One question I have is who to start next game. Usually you automatically start the goalie who got a shutout BUT in the case of the Oilers lately, it sure seems like every time a goalie has a good game and they get the next start, they crap the bed. I would lean to Talbot strictly because he got the shutout but they NEED these 2 guys to get on a roll.

For what it's worth, naturalstattrick had scoring chances at 5x5 at 34/23 in favour of the Ducks. I think it's also noteworthy that the Ducks are dead last in the league in shots/game. I don't want to dump on a win, but I don't think this is a case of one team just firing shots from the blue line all night, and the other team getting all the good chances.

Here's the heat map from naturalstattrick:



Yes, Ducks also had some shots from farther out, but there's also a lot from between the faceoff dots and in.

Overall, I think this game was a lot more even than the score showed, and that Talbot was the difference.

http://naturalstattrick.com/game.php?season=20182019&gam e=20651

Oilers Goal Differential
17/18: 234 GF / 263 GA (-29)
18/19: 232 GF / 274 GA (-42)
19/20 (82 game pace): 257 GF / 254 GA (+3) in 64 games
2021 (82 game pace):269 GF / 235 GA (+34) after 38 games

[Updated on: Mon, 07 January 2019 09:58]

McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Goose wrote on Mon, 07 January 2019 09:47

RDOilerfan wrote on Mon, 07 January 2019 08:00 Big win for the Oilers and a must have. They need another one. For the game, I really don't put a lot of stock into shots, I think the amount of good scoring chances are more important. The Oilers scored 4 goals, without Gibson being good, they easily have way more. I thought Talbot played really well but I felt the Oilers have more good scoring chances than the Ducks. When a team brings the puck into your zone and fires a long range shot at your goal that has little chance of going in. Yes that counts as a shot on goal and yes that is going to hurt your overall corsi because it is a shot attempt but does it mean much if it has next to no chance of going in? Not really in my opinion. One question I have is who to start next game. Usually you automatically start the goalie who got a shutout BUT in the case of the Oilers lately, it sure seems like every time a goalie has a good game and they get the next start, they crap the bed. I would lean to Talbot strictly because he got the shutout but they NEED these 2 guys to get on a roll. For what it's worth, naturalstattrick had scoring chances at 5x5 at 34/23 in favour of the Ducks. I think it's also noteworthy that the Ducks are dead last in the league in shots/game. I don't want to dump on a win, but I don't think this is a case of one team just firing shots from the blue line all night, and the other team getting all the good chances. Here's the heat map from naturalstattrick: Yes, Ducks also had some shots from farther out, but there's also a lot from between the faceoff dots and in. Overall, I think this game was a lot more even than the score showed, and that Talbot was the difference. http://naturalstattrick.com/game.php?season=20182019&gam e=20651

Think the game was pretty even until we had a decent lead. We got the more dangerous chances in the 1st I believe, after some early stink.

No doubt goalies are gonna have to be on their games for this team to have any hope. Not gonna be often, if at all, that we can outscore our problems.

"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

[Updated on: Mon, 07 January 2019 10:01]

The very definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing expecting different results.

Generally Disappointed.

Oilers Goal Differential
17/18: 234 GF / 263 GA (-29)
18/19: 232 GF / 274 GA (-42)
19/20 (82 game pace): 257 GF / 254 GA (+3) in 64 games
2021 (82 game pace):269 GF / 235 GA (+34) after 38 games

"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

The very definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing expecting different results.

Generally Disappointed.

McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Kr55 wrote on Mon, 07 January 2019 10:55

Goose wrote on Mon, 07 January 2019 09:47 RDOilerfan wrote on Mon, 07 January 2019 08:00 Big win for the Oilers and a must have. They need another one. For the game, I really don't put a lot of stock into shots, I think the amount of good scoring chances are more important. The Oilers scored 4 goals, without Gibson being good, they easily have way more. I thought Talbot played really well but I felt the Oilers have more good scoring chances than the Ducks. When a team brings the puck into your zone and fires a long range shot at your goal that has little chance of going in. Yes that counts as a shot on goal and yes that is going to hurt your overall corsi because it is a shot attempt but does it mean much if it has next to no chance of going in? Not really in my opinion. One question I have is who to start next game. Usually you automatically start the goalie who got a shutout BUT in the case of the Oilers lately, it sure seems like every time a goalie has a good game and they get the next start, they crap the bed. I would lean to Talbot strictly because he got the shutout but they NEED these 2 guys to get on a roll. For what it's worth, naturalstattrick had scoring chances at 5x5 at 34/23 in favour of the Ducks. I think it's also noteworthy that the Ducks are dead last in the league in shots/game. I don't want to dump on a win, but I don't think this is a case of one team just firing shots from the blue line all night, and the other team getting all the good chances. Here's the heat map from naturalstattrick: Yes, Ducks also had some shots from farther out, but there's also a lot from between the faceoff dots and in. Overall, I think this game was a lot more even than the score showed, and that Talbot was the difference. http://naturalstattrick.com/game.php?season=20182019&gam e=20651 Think the game was pretty even until we had a decent lead. We got the more dangerous chances in the 1st I believe, after some early stink. No doubt goalies are gonna have to be on their games for this team to have any hope. Not gonna be often, if at all, that we can outscore our problems.

Per that same website high danger chances were equal at 14 a piece.
I believe the count was McDavid- 8, Drai- 2 and RNH- 1.

That is 11 of 14 coming from the typical three. The difference in the game was a couple going in that often dont, JP comes to mind off the top, and Talbot playing one of his best games of the year.

As others have said, I dont want to crap on a win too much but this was not a great game played by the Oilers.

It WAS one of the best games based on actually taking advantage of chances and great goaltending from Talbot and those things havent happened at the same time often this year.

As usual it goes back to what a few of us predicted early on, the success of this team falls on the top players and Talbot. Many of the passengers were still passengers for most of the game with a couple of bright spots here and there

Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on

CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.

"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks