This day on November 26
None

Happy Birthday To: Hemskoreson, rb213, oilbaron1980, anjoo, MikeBro

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Warren Foegele
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Warren Foegele [message #790617]
Wed, 28 July 2021 16:46 Go to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Heard W. Foegele on Stauffer, he trains with C. McDavid, D. Nurse, Z. Hyman, and D. Shore.
He was on the ice with when he heard he was traded..
Should be a tight group, I expect good things from Foegele.

https://cms.nhl.bamgrid.com/images/photos/307228546/1024x576/cut.jpg

[Updated on: Wed, 28 July 2021 16:48]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790619 is a reply to message #790617 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 16:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 16:46

Heard W. Foegele on Stauffer, he trains with C. McDavid, D. Nurse, Z. Hyman, and D. Shore.
He was on the ice with when he heard he was traded..
Should be a tight group, I expect good things from Foegele.


hahaha. Now it makes sense why we extended Shore so early.

Welp, hope this all works out!

We are team McDavid Training Club!



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790620 is a reply to message #790619 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 16:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mightyreasoner  is currently offline mightyreasoner
Messages: 520
Registered: October 2005
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 16:48

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 16:46

Heard W. Foegele on Stauffer, he trains with C. McDavid, D. Nurse, Z. Hyman, and D. Shore.
He was on the ice with when he heard he was traded..
Should be a tight group, I expect good things from Foegele.


hahaha. Now it makes sense why we extended Shore so early.

Welp, hope this all works out!

We are team McDavid Training Club!


Which goalie does the group shoot on?



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790624 is a reply to message #790620 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 16:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

mightyreasoner wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 15:49


Which goalie does the group shoot on?


This guy.. he's a level headed personality with a flat and steady demeanor.. quiet in th enet..no wasted movements.. I'm his agent.. he'll play for pizza.. beer.. and a few game tickets..

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2078/3225/products/ShooterTutorII_6d80d5c7-f7c4-4997-a7d7-09ea988ee708_530x@2x.jpg?v=1500395183



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790625 is a reply to message #790624 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 16:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mightyreasoner  is currently offline mightyreasoner
Messages: 520
Registered: October 2005
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 16:55

mightyreasoner wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 15:49


Which goalie does the group shoot on?


This guy.. he's a level headed personality with a flat and steady demeanor.. quiet in th enet..no wasted movements.. I'm his agent.. he'll play for pizza.. beer.. and a few game tickets..

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2078/3225/products/ShooterTutorII_6d80d5c7-f7c4-4997-a7d7-09ea988ee708_530x@2x.jpg?v=1500395183


Better glove hand than Mikko...



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790670 is a reply to message #790625 ]
Thu, 29 July 2021 10:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HamBlaster  is currently offline HamBlaster
Messages: 989
Registered: June 2007

No Cups

An empty net has a better glove hand than Mikko


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790633 is a reply to message #790624 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 17:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 16:55

mightyreasoner wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 15:49


Which goalie does the group shoot on?


This guy.. he's a level headed personality with a flat and steady demeanor.. quiet in th enet..no wasted movements.. I'm his agent.. he'll play for pizza.. beer.. and a few game tickets..

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2078/3225/products/ShooterTutorII_6d80d5c7-f7c4-4997-a7d7-09ea988ee708_530x@2x.jpg?v=1500395183


Striking resemblance to Mike Smith!



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790782 is a reply to message #790633 ]
Sun, 01 August 2021 14:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 17:06

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 16:55

mightyreasoner wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 15:49


Which goalie does the group shoot on?


This guy.. he's a level headed personality with a flat and steady demeanor.. quiet in th enet..no wasted movements.. I'm his agent.. he'll play for pizza.. beer.. and a few game tickets..

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2078/3225/products/ShooterTutorII_6d80d5c7-f7c4-4997-a7d7-09ea988ee708_530x@2x.jpg?v=1500395183


Striking resemblance to Mike Smith!

No. Not deep enough in his net.

Baaaaa-zing!



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790622 is a reply to message #790619 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 16:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 15:48

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 16:46

Heard W. Foegele on Stauffer, he trains with C. McDavid, D. Nurse, Z. Hyman, and D. Shore.
He was on the ice with when he heard he was traded..
Should be a tight group, I expect good things from Foegele.


hahaha. Now it makes sense why we extended Shore so early.

Welp, hope this all works out!

We are team McDavid Training Club!



Explains a bit, McDavid and Nurse would know all 3 of those guys well, likely vouched for them, and for Hyman's case helped him decide on Edmonton.



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790661 is a reply to message #790619 ]
Thu, 29 July 2021 07:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
twilson1111  is currently offline twilson1111
Messages: 106
Registered: October 2010
Location: Calgary

No Cups

To make myself feel better about the future I'm going to make some assumptions.... There, done.

I like this development. I've assumed that McDavid is the Alpha of the training group and works harder than the rest, but he still notices who else trains like a star. I've also assumed that McDavid has been working with Holland and has identified these guys as workers, thus doing a bit of a job interview for these guys. I've assumed that these guys know they've signed onto the McDavid training contract and will get blasted if they fall off. I've assumed they are going to hold up to this agreement. This also means I've assumed McDavid has identified superhuman training as the key component to focus on this year in order to take the team to the next level.

Life is good!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790649 is a reply to message #790617 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 20:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Interested to see what they sign him at and for how long.

Fwiw, I didn’t think they would actually pull the trigger on moving Bear. I get it. But I didn’t think they would.

McLovin’ or Foegele, should be a pretty big piece to this team up front. If he can chip in 12-15 goals (he’s had 10-13-10 the last 3 seasons) and be what I’m going to call ‘Hyman light’ then I think this will be a big win (yep, I said win) for the Oilers.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790655 is a reply to message #790649 ]
Wed, 28 July 2021 22:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 19:58

Interested to see what they sign him at and for how long.

Fwiw, I didn’t think they would actually pull the trigger on moving Bear. I get it. But I didn’t think they would.

McLovin’ or Foegele, should be a pretty big piece to this team up front. If he can chip in 12-15 goals (he’s had 10-13-10 the last 3 seasons) and be what I’m going to call ‘Hyman light’ then I think this will be a big win (yep, I said win) for the Oilers.


Didn't know much about Foegele until we picked him up, big body with wheels and relentless compete, looks like a winner.
Here's an article ..
https://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/1629669



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790671 is a reply to message #790655 ]
Thu, 29 July 2021 10:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mightyreasoner  is currently offline mightyreasoner
Messages: 520
Registered: October 2005
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 22:11

Oscargasm wrote on Wed, 28 July 2021 19:58

Interested to see what they sign him at and for how long.

Fwiw, I didn’t think they would actually pull the trigger on moving Bear. I get it. But I didn’t think they would.

McLovin’ or Foegele, should be a pretty big piece to this team up front. If he can chip in 12-15 goals (he’s had 10-13-10 the last 3 seasons) and be what I’m going to call ‘Hyman light’ then I think this will be a big win (yep, I said win) for the Oilers.


Didn't know much about Foegele until we picked him up, big body with wheels and relentless compete, looks like a winner.
Here's an article ..
https://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/1629669


Whenever I have watched him, I've noticed what a pain he is for defenders. Really strong puck retrieval, possession, and forechecking in the offensive zone, and has a decent finish. Goes to the net well, and has a strong 200-foot game (which serves him well as a penalty killer). I think he's what we've been missing on that third line for a while, and I think he actually has the skill to play up the lineup if we need it and if there are injuries.

It's a very limited viewing for sure, but I remember him as a player who impressed me each time I watched the Hurricanes.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790679 is a reply to message #790617 ]
Thu, 29 July 2021 12:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JPro  is currently offline JPro
Messages: 810
Registered: January 2006
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Now this is the kind of intangible factor that gets me excited - training bros!

While I no idea who this guy was prior to yesterday, I'm certainly coming around to the trade the more I read about him.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790713 is a reply to message #790617 ]
Thu, 29 July 2021 20:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Kids and wife are fast asleep... time to watch Oilers latest trade acquisition in Superbad


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790765 is a reply to message #790617 ]
Sat, 31 July 2021 12:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2343
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

https://twitter.com/jasongregor/status/1421537235611144195?s =21

Gregor reporting:

Quote:

Foegele three years at $2.75m AAV is a good contract for him and Edmonton. Play well and he should earn more icetime than he had on a deep Carolina team. #NHL #Oilers



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790778 is a reply to message #790765 ]
Sun, 01 August 2021 09:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oiler76  is currently offline Oiler76
Messages: 16
Registered: August 2006
Location: Coquitlam, BC

No Cups

inverno76 wrote on Sat, 31 July 2021 11:31

https://twitter.com/jasongregor/status/1421537235611144195?s =21

Gregor reporting:

Quote:

Foegele three years at $2.75m AAV is a good contract for him and Edmonton. Play well and he should earn more icetime than he had on a deep Carolina team. #NHL #Oilers



This must be a very good deal, cause it’s been 24 hours and no has commented on it at all lol



" The Vancouver Canucks: Celebrating Second Round Losses for 50 years!"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790779 is a reply to message #790778 ]
Sun, 01 August 2021 09:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrudeRemarks  is currently offline CrudeRemarks
Messages: 1703
Registered: November 2010
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

Oiler76 wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 09:18

inverno76 wrote on Sat, 31 July 2021 11:31

https://twitter.com/jasongregor/status/1421537235611144195?s =21

Gregor reporting:

Quote:

Foegele three years at $2.75m AAV is a good contract for him and Edmonton. Play well and he should earn more icetime than he had on a deep Carolina team. #NHL #Oilers



This must be a very good deal, cause it’s been 24 hours and no has commented on it at all lol

I think that speaks to the fact that most of us didn’t object to getting the player, only the acquisition cost. I think 2.75 million is a good price for a second line player and an upper end price for a 3rd liner. Foegele might be either in Edmonton.



You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790783 is a reply to message #790779 ]
Sun, 01 August 2021 22:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

CrudeRemarks wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 09:44

Oiler76 wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 09:18

inverno76 wrote on Sat, 31 July 2021 11:31

https://twitter.com/jasongregor/status/1421537235611144195?s =21

Gregor reporting:

Quote:

Foegele three years at $2.75m AAV is a good contract for him and Edmonton. Play well and he should earn more icetime than he had on a deep Carolina team. #NHL #Oilers



This must be a very good deal, cause it’s been 24 hours and no has commented on it at all lol

I think that speaks to the fact that most of us didn’t object to getting the player, only the acquisition cost. I think 2.75 million is a good price for a second line player and an upper end price for a 3rd liner. Foegele might be either in Edmonton.


Also, this summer has been such a disappointment, there's no point quibbling about every little thing. There's so much more tragic moves being made.

The fact is, he made $2.15MM last year, so he was bound to get a raise, especially given that the team felt strongly enough about him to trade a young right-shot defenceman for him. It is notable that we're $750K worse off on the cap hit side of that trade this year - although I expect that Bear will play well and make more than Foegele starting next year.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790785 is a reply to message #790783 ]
Mon, 02 August 2021 07:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2951
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Adam wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 22:50



...... there's no point quibbling about every little thing.


Judging from the constant whine you emit, I really don't think you actually believe this.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790793 is a reply to message #790785 ]
Mon, 02 August 2021 22:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 07:15

Adam wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 22:50



...... there's no point quibbling about every little thing.


Judging from the constant whine you emit, I really don't think you actually believe this.


You know, your complaint here (ironic as it is, as you're again whining about whining) would have more validity if the Oilers didn't always prove me right.

I challenge the team's direction because frankly, they rarely seem to be on the right path. They have made dozens of unforced errors in team management over the last several years - and that hasn't gotten any better under Holland.

He's not only making questionable moves, but he's also getting completely flustered when pushed even slightly on them. He's clearly not a great negotiator, and he's been completely exposed this summer on that - with all kinds of better defencemen available for much less than he paid for the used up shell of Duncan Keith at full cap hit.

I have to say, I don't really understand why people wouldn't want the Oilers to stop doing stupid things and right the ship before we run out of years with McDavid. I'd really like to see a Stanley Cup Champion again and it's pretty offensive how badly these guys have botched it.

But then, maybe as a guy who hates skill players as a matter of course, you think this really is the right course. If we could just add 6 more Cal Clutterbucks, we'd be in the promised land, right?



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790791 is a reply to message #790783 ]
Mon, 02 August 2021 13:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1034
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

Adam wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 21:50

CrudeRemarks wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 09:44

Oiler76 wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 09:18

inverno76 wrote on Sat, 31 July 2021 11:31

https://twitter.com/jasongregor/status/1421537235611144195?s =21

Gregor reporting:

Quote:

Foegele three years at $2.75m AAV is a good contract for him and Edmonton. Play well and he should earn more icetime than he had on a deep Carolina team. #NHL #Oilers



This must be a very good deal, cause it’s been 24 hours and no has commented on it at all lol

I think that speaks to the fact that most of us didn’t object to getting the player, only the acquisition cost. I think 2.75 million is a good price for a second line player and an upper end price for a 3rd liner. Foegele might be either in Edmonton.


Also, this summer has been such a disappointment, there's no point quibbling about every little thing. There's so much more tragic moves being made.

The fact is, he made $2.15MM last year, so he was bound to get a raise, especially given that the team felt strongly enough about him to trade a young right-shot defenceman for him. It is notable that we're $750K worse off on the cap hit side of that trade this year - although I expect that Bear will play well and make more than Foegele starting next year.


What would have been a NOT disappointment?



Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790794 is a reply to message #790791 ]
Mon, 02 August 2021 22:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

nullterm wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 13:44

Adam wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 21:50

CrudeRemarks wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 09:44

Oiler76 wrote on Sun, 01 August 2021 09:18

inverno76 wrote on Sat, 31 July 2021 11:31

https://twitter.com/jasongregor/status/1421537235611144195?s =21

Gregor reporting:

Quote:

Foegele three years at $2.75m AAV is a good contract for him and Edmonton. Play well and he should earn more icetime than he had on a deep Carolina team. #NHL #Oilers



This must be a very good deal, cause it’s been 24 hours and no has commented on it at all lol

I think that speaks to the fact that most of us didn’t object to getting the player, only the acquisition cost. I think 2.75 million is a good price for a second line player and an upper end price for a 3rd liner. Foegele might be either in Edmonton.


Also, this summer has been such a disappointment, there's no point quibbling about every little thing. There's so much more tragic moves being made.

The fact is, he made $2.15MM last year, so he was bound to get a raise, especially given that the team felt strongly enough about him to trade a young right-shot defenceman for him. It is notable that we're $750K worse off on the cap hit side of that trade this year - although I expect that Bear will play well and make more than Foegele starting next year.


What would have been a NOT disappointment?


With the Bear trade? Or with the summer as a whole?



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790820 is a reply to message #790794 ]
Tue, 03 August 2021 22:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1034
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

Adam wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 21:56

nullterm wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 13:44

What would have been a NOT disappointment?


With the Bear trade? Or with the summer as a whole?


As a whole. What realistically could have happened?



Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790827 is a reply to message #790820 ]
Wed, 04 August 2021 08:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrudeRemarks  is currently offline CrudeRemarks
Messages: 1703
Registered: November 2010
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

nullterm wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 21:56

nullterm wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 13:44

What would have been a NOT disappointment?


With the Bear trade? Or with the summer as a whole?


As a whole. What realistically could have happened?

Keith at 50% retention plus a draft pick as a sweetener

flip the draft pick to seattle to have them take either Koskinen or Neal

re-sign Larsson, still get Hyman

Trade Bear if you really don't see him as the future, but recognize the inherent value of right shot D and win a trade for a change.

If Neal isn't a Kraken, put him on LTIR since he's clearing suffering from Long Covid and can't play hockey anymore.

That's off the top of my head, and doesn't touch on the bottom end signings.



You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790846 is a reply to message #790827 ]
Wed, 04 August 2021 12:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

CrudeRemarks wrote on Wed, 04 August 2021 08:58

nullterm wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 21:56

nullterm wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 13:44

What would have been a NOT disappointment?


With the Bear trade? Or with the summer as a whole?


As a whole. What realistically could have happened?

Keith at 50% retention plus a draft pick as a sweetener

flip the draft pick to seattle to have them take either Koskinen or Neal

re-sign Larsson, still get Hyman

Trade Bear if you really don't see him as the future, but recognize the inherent value of right shot D and win a trade for a change.

If Neal isn't a Kraken, put him on LTIR since he's clearing suffering from Long Covid and can't play hockey anymore.

That's off the top of my head, and doesn't touch on the bottom end signings.


I really think the Keith trade occurring when it did helped the team this offseason. Yes. Retention should have occurred. I can’t dispute that.

But. Holland holds steady and doesn’t make that trade when he did, they protect Larss, unsigned, and he clearly wanted to go elsewhere so he bolts on signing day and then Holland is reactionary while names are already off the board. They likely don’t get Barrie at that point. Likely don’t get Ceci at that point. Perhaps they keep Bear, but let’s face it, he’s not a top pairing guy at this point in his career.

I’m in the minority, but I truly believe this d corp is the best we’ve had since the Pronger season.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790850 is a reply to message #790846 ]
Wed, 04 August 2021 12:59 Go to previous message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3908
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Wed, 04 August 2021 12:40

CrudeRemarks wrote on Wed, 04 August 2021 08:58

nullterm wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 21:56

nullterm wrote on Mon, 02 August 2021 13:44

What would have been a NOT disappointment?


With the Bear trade? Or with the summer as a whole?


As a whole. What realistically could have happened?

Keith at 50% retention plus a draft pick as a sweetener

flip the draft pick to seattle to have them take either Koskinen or Neal

re-sign Larsson, still get Hyman

Trade Bear if you really don't see him as the future, but recognize the inherent value of right shot D and win a trade for a change.

If Neal isn't a Kraken, put him on LTIR since he's clearing suffering from Long Covid and can't play hockey anymore.

That's off the top of my head, and doesn't touch on the bottom end signings.


I really think the Keith trade occurring when it did helped the team this offseason. Yes. Retention should have occurred. I can’t dispute that.

But. Holland holds steady and doesn’t make that trade when he did, they protect Larss, unsigned, and he clearly wanted to go elsewhere so he bolts on signing day and then Holland is reactionary while names are already off the board. They likely don’t get Barrie at that point. Likely don’t get Ceci at that point. Perhaps they keep Bear, but let’s face it, he’s not a top pairing guy at this point in his career.

I’m in the minority, but I truly believe this d corp is the best we’ve had since the Pronger season.

I agree with you, I think the defense is better and I don't understand why many see it as downgraded much if at all.
Nurse - Barrie - they were a good first pairing. Nurse continues to get better every season so I don't him taking a step back defensively. Barrie played like he always does, great on offense, so-so defensively. I don't see that pair stepping back.

Keith - The Oilers had Jones, Lagesson, Russell, Koekkoek and Kulikov as their second pairing left shot. Complain about the Hawks retaining which is valid but Keith is a significant upgrade over those dmen. Russell, Koekkoek are #6 dmen. Kulikov is pretty mediocre and I think a #5. I don't even know if Lagesson is a full time NHLer and the same can be said for Jones. Maybe Jones is a 3rd pairing guy but not a top 4.

Ceci- I don't pretend to know a ton about Ceci so maybe he isn't quite as good defensively as Larsson but he moves way better and moves the puck way better. A year ago, a lot of people thought Larsson was done or a 3rd pairing guy sighting injury, skating and puck moving as the reason. So with that in mind, I see Ceci as a wash for Larsson. Lose a little on physical play and pure defense but gain a lot on puck moving and skating.

Bouchard has more skill than Bear, he has more offense than Bear, skates better than Bear. Bigger than Bear. Moves the puck better than Bear. I think he has better defensive awareness. Bear was the Oilers 3rd pairing dman last year because that is where his game was at. So they upgraded in that spot.

So at worse, Nurse- Barrie is a wash.
Keith is an upgrade over anyone they had as their second paring left shot.
Bouchard is an upgrade over Bear in all areas

Ceci is probably a wash over Larsson.

Then if they do nothing else and have 1 of Russell or Lagesson as their 3rd pairing left shot, it's a wash.

So I don't see how people can say the defense is worse. Jones was a healthy scratch and its still up in the air what he is. Lagesson is not a full time NHLer yet. Russell is what he is. Koekkoek is a 6/7. So unless you really like Kulikov which I seem to remember most people thought Kulikov wasn't very good, Keith alone makes the defense better.

[Updated on: Wed, 04 August 2021 13:01]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790797 is a reply to message #790617 ]
Tue, 03 August 2021 03:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rabbeyick  is currently offline Rabbeyick
Messages: 3
Registered: August 2021

No Cups

not sure losing Bear was the right move. 2 way defender with upside...?
https://www.sportsbetting3.com/nhl/nhl-betting
think hurricanes are going to be laughing after this deal.

[Updated on: Wed, 04 August 2021 09:52]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790816 is a reply to message #790797 ]
Tue, 03 August 2021 17:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Rabbeyick wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 03:05

not sure losing Bear was the right move. 2 way defender with upside...?

What’s the upside? I’m guessing age?

Because it sure isn’t size. I’m often wrong, but I’m not certain his ceiling is that high. Not many key small defenders on cup teams lately.

I’m fine with moving Bear, but just don’t know enough about Foegele to be critical of the trade.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790822 is a reply to message #790816 ]
Wed, 04 August 2021 07:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goose  is currently offline Goose
Messages: 1098
Registered: October 2006
Location: Vancouver

1 Cup

g2k wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 16:31

Rabbeyick wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 03:05

not sure losing Bear was the right move. 2 way defender with upside...?

What’s the upside? I’m guessing age?

Because it sure isn’t size. I’m often wrong, but I’m not certain his ceiling is that high. Not many key small defenders on cup teams lately.

I’m fine with moving Bear, but just don’t know enough about Foegele to be critical of the trade.


It's not like Ethan Bear is 5'7". He's basically the same size as Duncan Keith.



Oilers Goal Differential
17/18: 234 GF / 263 GA (-29)
18/19: 232 GF / 274 GA (-42)
19/20 (82 game pace): 257 GF / 254 GA (+3) in 64 games
2021 (82 game pace):269 GF / 235 GA (+34) after 38 games

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Warren Foegele [message #790824 is a reply to message #790822 ]
Wed, 04 August 2021 08:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Goose wrote on Wed, 04 August 2021 07:28

g2k wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 16:31

Rabbeyick wrote on Tue, 03 August 2021 03:05

not sure losing Bear was the right move. 2 way defender with upside...?

What’s the upside? I’m guessing age?

Because it sure isn’t size. I’m often wrong, but I’m not certain his ceiling is that high. Not many key small defenders on cup teams lately.

I’m fine with moving Bear, but just don’t know enough about Foegele to be critical of the trade.


It's not like Ethan Bear is 5'7". He's basically the same size as Duncan Keith.


Forgetting that players grow an inch for every cup and individual award they win?



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 
Previous Topic:Oilers sign Brendan Perlini UFA per Sportsnet
Next Topic:Patrick Russell returns!
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca