This day on November 22
Acquired: Kari Takko (1990)
Departed: Bruce Bell (1990)

Happy Birthday To: SAE_10W30, Radville, Flavs93

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46)
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816846]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:30 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1558
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

2
5
Final

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win:   0%
Seattle to win:   0%
0 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816848 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG is currently online NetBOG
Messages: 2948
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Good job.

Big win to put pressure on top of Pacific.

I notice the Chicken Little's have been real quiet lately.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816849 is a reply to message #816848 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HamBlaster  is currently offline HamBlaster
Messages: 989
Registered: June 2007

No Cups

Beauty win. The Oilers have decided to commit to a full 60 minutes now, or at least it looks like it...


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816868 is a reply to message #816848 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 03:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
clutchlikeeberle  is currently offline clutchlikeeberle
Messages: 252
Registered: April 2012

No Cups

Hi, little chicken here! Oilers went back to playing like they did last year in February. Not sure why it took half a season to become engaged and play as a team but hey, I'll gladly be wrong if they continue to play with this effort level. I'm just shocked we won a game without Allstar JP in the lineup. Another solid game for broberg!


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816850 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

You’re yesterday’s newspaper Stu. Second fiddle. Second banana. Door opener. Go have another baby.

This is Jacks team.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816854 is a reply to message #816850 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2342
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

g2k wrote on Tue, 17 January 2023 21:35

You’re yesterday’s newspaper Stu. Second fiddle. Second banana. Door opener. Go have another baby.

This is Jacks team.


Hahaha. That glove hand is still sketch, but he’s looking bigger and better in net.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816856 is a reply to message #816854 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

inverno76 wrote on Tue, 17 January 2023 21:40

g2k wrote on Tue, 17 January 2023 21:35

You’re yesterday’s newspaper Stu. Second fiddle. Second banana. Door opener. Go have another baby.

This is Jacks team.


Hahaha. That glove hand is still sketch, but he’s looking bigger and better in net.


Switched gloves after that stinker and then made a solid catch a few moments later with the different glove.

This is the positive of the streaky Campbell. Hopefully it maintains for awhile yet



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816858 is a reply to message #816856 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 17 January 2023 21:42

inverno76 wrote on Tue, 17 January 2023 21:40

g2k wrote on Tue, 17 January 2023 21:35

You’re yesterday’s newspaper Stu. Second fiddle. Second banana. Door opener. Go have another baby.

This is Jacks team.


Hahaha. That glove hand is still sketch, but he’s looking bigger and better in net.


Switched gloves after that stinker and then made a solid catch a few moments later with the different glove.

This is the positive of the streaky Campbell. Hopefully it maintains for awhile yet

Did he change gloves? Didn't hear that. Lol.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816852 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smyth260  is currently offline smyth260
Messages: 1081
Registered: November 2007

1 Cup

Another great win.

5 points away from division lead.

Vegas is battered, Mark Stone is having back problems again.

Its definitely there if they want it enough.



Clean house or bust

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816853 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2342
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups


https://y.yarn.co/e1ca4952-a24a-4fc2-98a4-20e5a6808bf8_text.gif

Keep it rolling. Next up is Tampa on the second half of back-to-backs. Tgg he en it’s Vancouver in the same boat.

Time to gain some points in the division!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816855 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Solid dub. Depth scoring on fleek. Jack looking like soup you can eat with a fork, lately.

Also pretty slick how many in the twitterverse wanted the Oil to claim Tolvenen (they didnt) but he still scores a (backbreaking) goal to put the Oil up 4-2.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816869 is a reply to message #816855 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 03:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
clutchlikeeberle  is currently offline clutchlikeeberle
Messages: 252
Registered: April 2012

No Cups

Tolevan has been great for the Kraken. Better then twitterverse darling JP.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816885 is a reply to message #816869 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 11:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2342
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

clutchlikeeberle wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 03:44

Tolevan has been great for the Kraken. Better then twitterverse darling JP.


Why are you hating on a guy who was not even in the lineup? Seems a bit unnecessary, especially when it looks a departure is imminent. No need to pee on the guy as he goes out the front the door.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816903 is a reply to message #816885 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 15:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7175
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

inverno76 wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:10

clutchlikeeberle wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 03:44

Tolevan has been great for the Kraken. Better then twitterverse darling JP.


Why are you hating on a guy who was not even in the lineup? Seems a bit unnecessary, especially when it looks a departure is imminent. No need to pee on the guy as he goes out the front door.


Worth noting that many of those who tout the strengths of Puljujarvi were pointing out that Tolvanen looked like a fantastic waiver claim because of great underlying offers. Jim Matheson scorned that potential pickup at the time.

Instead we still employ Devin Shore...



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816857 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 21:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Oilers had some trouble with the rate of play of Seattle early I thought but got going. McDavid doing his thing (yawn), Hyman having a night and some luck, and the lesser lights getting some opportunistic oily goals.

Soupy let in an own goal courtesy of Nurse, let in a smelly one but stopped the rest. He doesn't look nearly as good technically as Skinner, but looking and playing much better than a few starts ago. Thank goodness Skinner stepped in and played as well as he did. It'll help a lot defensively and on the kill if both these guys are above water.

Kane looked pretty good, should have had one, could have had another. I was shocked he killed penalties. This game could have easily been 8-2.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816860 is a reply to message #816857 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 22:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
watchman  is currently offline watchman
Messages: 1412
Registered: October 2019
Location: River City

1 Cup

Kraken looked sharp on their PPs in the 1st. After that it looked like they ran out of gas. OIL got a bunch of breaks and overcame the freebie Campbell gave up.

Let's see what Tampa has left in the tank Thursday. icon_nod



...this time, it's for real (isn't it?).

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816862 is a reply to message #816860 ]
Tue, 17 January 2023 22:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1033
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

Looking like a completely different team than a month or two ago.

Campbell looking like a completely different man, whatever he figured out is working.

Everyone is moving the puck to the net and getting rewarded for their efforts.

Keep building on whatever they got going!



Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816867 is a reply to message #816862 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 00:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2262
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

4 straight. Starting to look more like a team now !!


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816870 is a reply to message #816867 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 05:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2262
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

Nice to see Campbell finally getting it together


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816871 is a reply to message #816870 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 07:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1397
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Didn't get to watch this one, but huge win!

Campbell with his 4th game in a row with a .900+ save %. That's awesome. Saw the highlight of the one that went through his glove - on the one hand it looks super weak, but on the other, at least his glove was in the right place? Anyway - 4 in a row over .900 for the first time this year. That's a good sign.

Also great to see some goals from our depth guys these last few games (McLeod 3 goals in his last 5, Janmark 4 pts in his last 4, Kostin 4 goals in his last 4, Holloway with 4 points in his last 4)

And to win the 5 on 5 matchup for the 5th game in a row is awesome. Great to see us with the best PP in the league and to see the PK improving (though still quite a way to go to get to around middle of the pack), but come playoff time, you need to be able to outscore them at ES.

Anyway - pretty good streak here that is not just because of 29 and 97.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816875 is a reply to message #816871 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 08:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3908
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Good win. I thought for most of it the Oilers were the superior team. I am loving how they seem to have decided to play defense. 4 games in a row.

Campbell let in that bad one but other than that was very good again. Great to see.

Depth scoring! 3 goals from bottom 6 guys. I thought Foegele had a good game.

Broberg is continuing to rack up good games. I am starting to see why they would be reluctant to trade him. Teams going for a cup need players on ELC's to fill in some holes.

Keep it going! With all those early games against all those good teams, the Oilers schedule is setting up where they play a bunch of weaker teams and have the potential to go on a bit of a run.

[Updated on: Wed, 18 January 2023 08:16]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816880 is a reply to message #816875 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 10:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2262
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 15:12

Good win. I thought for most of it the Oilers were the superior team. I am loving how they seem to have decided to play defense. 4 games in a row.

Campbell let in that bad one but other than that was very good again. Great to see.

Depth scoring! 3 goals from bottom 6 guys. I thought Foegele had a good game.

Broberg is continuing to rack up good games. I am starting to see why they would be reluctant to trade him. Teams going for a cup need players on ELC's to fill in some holes.

Keep it going! With all those early games against all those good teams, the Oilers schedule is setting up where they play a bunch of weaker teams and have the potential to go on a bit of a run.


The last 4 games we have looked like a complete team for the most part. It’s been a breath of fresh air. If we keep playing like this we can beat almost anybody. Tampa is red hot. That should be another good challenge for us to see where we stand

Granted we have beat them once already this year if I recall correctly



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816881 is a reply to message #816871 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 10:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7175
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Mike wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 07:05

Campbell with his 4th game in a row with a .900+ save %. That's awesome. Saw the highlight of the one that went through his glove - on the one hand it looks super weak, but on the other, at least his glove was in the right place? Anyway - 4 in a row over .900 for the first time this year. That's a good sign.



I swear, the look that Jack Campbell gives his glove hand is the exact same look of scorn and disdain that Mike Smith would give his defencemen...



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816887 is a reply to message #816881 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 11:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2342
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 10:55

Mike wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 07:05

Campbell with his 4th game in a row with a .900+ save %. That's awesome. Saw the highlight of the one that went through his glove - on the one hand it looks super weak, but on the other, at least his glove was in the right place? Anyway - 4 in a row over .900 for the first time this year. That's a good sign.



I swear, the look that Jack Campbell gives his glove hand is the exact same look of scorn and disdain that Mike Smith would give his defencemen...



I get it. I look at my putter when I miss a putt. I look at my ball glove when I miss a grounder. Always blame your equipment.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816888 is a reply to message #816887 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 11:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7803
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

inverno76 wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:18

Adam wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 10:55

Mike wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 07:05

Campbell with his 4th game in a row with a .900+ save %. That's awesome. Saw the highlight of the one that went through his glove - on the one hand it looks super weak, but on the other, at least his glove was in the right place? Anyway - 4 in a row over .900 for the first time this year. That's a good sign.



I swear, the look that Jack Campbell gives his glove hand is the exact same look of scorn and disdain that Mike Smith would give his defencemen...



I get it. I look at my putter when I miss a putt. I look at my ball glove when I miss a grounder. Always blame your equipment.

I hated my seven iron so much until my clubs were stolen. I miss her now.

But seriously, who the hell steals golf clubs?



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816889 is a reply to message #816888 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 12:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JPro  is currently offline JPro
Messages: 810
Registered: January 2006
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:23


But seriously, who the hell steals golf clubs?

In 2019 my garage got broken into literally one day after renovating it and getting it optimally organized. They made a mess in there, but only stole one thing: my axe. They left behind someone's random golf club in exchange. It was like a video game equipment upgrade.




Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816891 is a reply to message #816889 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 13:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2342
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

JPro wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 12:30

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:23


But seriously, who the hell steals golf clubs?

In 2019 my garage got broken into literally one day after renovating it and getting it optimally organized. They made a mess in there, but only stole one thing: my axe. They left behind someone's random golf club in exchange. It was like a video game equipment upgrade.




In 2004 I had my garage broken into as well. It was just after my wedding and we had a half pallet of pop leftover from the festivities, or like my dad would call it "the mix". They cleaned out my garage, took two sets of golf clubs, all my fishing equipment and lots of tools. They also stole my pop, but left behind four bottles of Pepsi Blue. Picky SOB's.

Side note. I believe the same thieves returned a few months later and robbed me again, but I had not replaced much of my stuff so they just made a mess of my garage door. We got a dog shortly after that.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816892 is a reply to message #816891 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 14:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dragon_Matt  is currently offline Dragon_Matt
Messages: 766
Registered: January 2009
Location: edmonton

No Cups

I have a friend who's car was broken into once. The thieves only took select CD's and left the remainder. If that's not an indictment of his taste in music, I don't know what is.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816909 is a reply to message #816892 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 22:34 Go to previous message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2342
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Dragon_Matt wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 14:11

I have a friend who's car was broken into once. The thieves only took select CD's and left the remainder. If that's not an indictment of his taste in music, I don't know what is.


I almost respect the picky thief. Who drank Pepsi Blue? Not sure of your friends taste in music, but if a thief went into a car a found Tge Best of Engelbert Humperdinck I’d hope he’d leave it behind. He isn’t listening to it and he can’t sell it.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816900 is a reply to message #816888 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 15:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smyth260  is currently offline smyth260
Messages: 1081
Registered: November 2007

1 Cup

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 10:23

inverno76 wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:18

Adam wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 10:55

Mike wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 07:05

Campbell with his 4th game in a row with a .900+ save %. That's awesome. Saw the highlight of the one that went through his glove - on the one hand it looks super weak, but on the other, at least his glove was in the right place? Anyway - 4 in a row over .900 for the first time this year. That's a good sign.



I swear, the look that Jack Campbell gives his glove hand is the exact same look of scorn and disdain that Mike Smith would give his defencemen...



I get it. I look at my putter when I miss a putt. I look at my ball glove when I miss a grounder. Always blame your equipment.

I hated my seven iron so much until my clubs were stolen. I miss her now.

But seriously, who the hell steals golf clubs?


I’ve had them stolen out of the trunk of my old 98 civic (which was later stolen entirely in the same parking spot).

They were a bunch of no name clubs. Powerbilt irons, knock off cleveland wedges…now I got Taylormades and Clevelands but its just not the same ya know.



Clean house or bust

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816901 is a reply to message #816888 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 15:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7175
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:23

inverno76 wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:18

Adam wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 10:55

Mike wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 07:05

Campbell with his 4th game in a row with a .900+ save %. That's awesome. Saw the highlight of the one that went through his glove - on the one hand it looks super weak, but on the other, at least his glove was in the right place? Anyway - 4 in a row over .900 for the first time this year. That's a good sign.



I swear, the look that Jack Campbell gives his glove hand is the exact same look of scorn and disdain that Mike Smith would give his defencemen...



I get it. I look at my putter when I miss a putt. I look at my ball glove when I miss a grounder. Always blame your equipment.

I hated my seven iron so much until my clubs were stolen. I miss her now.

But seriously, who the hell steals golf clubs?


And yet if you had her back, how long until the first long glare?



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816902 is a reply to message #816901 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 15:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7803
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 15:13

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:23

inverno76 wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 11:18

Adam wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 10:55

Mike wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 07:05

Campbell with his 4th game in a row with a .900+ save %. That's awesome. Saw the highlight of the one that went through his glove - on the one hand it looks super weak, but on the other, at least his glove was in the right place? Anyway - 4 in a row over .900 for the first time this year. That's a good sign.



I swear, the look that Jack Campbell gives his glove hand is the exact same look of scorn and disdain that Mike Smith would give his defencemen...



I get it. I look at my putter when I miss a putt. I look at my ball glove when I miss a grounder. Always blame your equipment.

I hated my seven iron so much until my clubs were stolen. I miss her now.

But seriously, who the hell steals golf clubs?


And yet if you had her back, how long until the first long glare?

The over / under would be 1.5 swings.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816882 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 10:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kungpaobenji27  is currently offline kungpaobenji27
Messages: 340
Registered: August 2003
Location: Irving, Texas

No Cups

What a strange scenario for Foegele/Ryan publicly being placed on the "trade block" only for both guys to provide depth scoring last night....

Foegele's production isn't what it's supposed to be for what he's being compensated making me think he gets moved this offseason....however, he's played with more of an edge & provided intangibles since being inserted onto the PK which got him skating harder & more tactically too. His hitting & clutch goals will increase his trade value this upcoming offseason which is a good thing.

I say keep him till this summer and unload JP now to create cap space for other key additions

Good complete game last night from the squad!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816884 is a reply to message #816882 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 11:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3908
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Foegele has 5 goals, 9 pts in 33 games. Over 82, that's 12 goals, 22 pts. SO pretty much what he did last year. He had 12 - 26 in 82 games last season. For the price, I suspect they were hoping he'd improve on those numbers a little.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816886 is a reply to message #816884 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 11:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kungpaobenji27  is currently offline kungpaobenji27
Messages: 340
Registered: August 2003
Location: Irving, Texas

No Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 12:02

Foegele has 5 goals, 9 pts in 33 games. Over 82, that's 12 goals, 22 pts. SO pretty much what he did last year. He had 12 - 26 in 82 games last season. For the price, I suspect they were hoping he'd improve on those numbers a little.


Which of course means he's too expensive for what he brings....though he has been relatively more clutch this season opposed to his production last season coming in garbage time situations

Good to capitalize not just on a team playing their 2nd of a back to back but also coming back west from a long east coast trip.

Hoping we can continue that trend in a favorable Thurs & Sat night against teams in a similar situation

[Updated on: Wed, 18 January 2023 11:15]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816894 is a reply to message #816846 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 14:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 10770
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Just saw that Hyman is 5 points away from a career high. Some guys have had a heck of a season already. 25-18-3 after 46 games. Last year we were 25-18-3 after 46. Early struggles for dif reasons, but the cure may be the same. Proper defensive effort by the whole group, and depth stepping up. Goaltending improved around this time last year too.


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816896 is a reply to message #816894 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 14:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3908
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

I've been saying it over and over again. The biggest problem the Oilers were having is a refusal by all players on the ice to play team defense. Early in the year, it seemed the team left defending to the dmen and the forwards just concentrated on scoring. Since after Christmas, I have seen more forwards from top to bottom backchecking hard than was happening all year long. I don't think the coaches has done anything different, I don't think the system got changed, it's a mindset change from the players. Playing defense can be not that much fun but you have to do it to win.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816898 is a reply to message #816896 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 14:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 10770
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 14:38

I've been saying it over and over again. The biggest problem the Oilers were having is a refusal by all players on the ice to play team defense. Early in the year, it seemed the team left defending to the dmen and the forwards just concentrated on scoring. Since after Christmas, I have seen more forwards from top to bottom backchecking hard than was happening all year long. I don't think the coaches has done anything different, I don't think the system got changed, it's a mindset change from the players. Playing defense can be not that much fun but you have to do it to win.


Team just needs a final kick in the butt to put in a proper effort?

Last year coach change.

This year, falling to 5th in the division at the mid point of the year and looking up in shame at the a 2 year old team and the other expansion team ahead of them?



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46) [message #816899 is a reply to message #816898 ]
Wed, 18 January 2023 14:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3908
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 14:41

RDOilerfan wrote on Wed, 18 January 2023 14:38

I've been saying it over and over again. The biggest problem the Oilers were having is a refusal by all players on the ice to play team defense. Early in the year, it seemed the team left defending to the dmen and the forwards just concentrated on scoring. Since after Christmas, I have seen more forwards from top to bottom backchecking hard than was happening all year long. I don't think the coaches has done anything different, I don't think the system got changed, it's a mindset change from the players. Playing defense can be not that much fun but you have to do it to win.


Team just needs a final kick in the butt to put in a proper effort?

Last year coach change.

This year, falling to 5th in the division at the mid point of the year and looking up in shame at the a 2 year old team and the other expansion team ahead of them?

It's frustrating to watch them at times spin their wheels and not play up to their potential. It almost seems like they come in thinking they can buck the trend and bother to play how everyone else does. So they try to go all offense, no defense. When that doesn't work once again, they start playing properly.



Send a private message to this user  

 
Previous Topic:Pregame: Tampa Bay @ Edmonton (Game #47)
Next Topic:Pregame: Seattle @ Edmonton (Game #46)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca