This day on November 25
None

Happy Birthday To: Bert, romanoksuita, SixCupComing, BobBeers, Jodes

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44)
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799401]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:30 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1561
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

4
1
Final

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win:   0%
Chicago to win:   0%
0 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799402 is a reply to message #799401 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

That’s a good team over there guys. Don’t kid yourselves. Don’t get down.

Let’s keep it light in here tonight people.

Smith Rising..



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799416 is a reply to message #799402 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:35

That’s a good team over there guys. Don’t kid yourselves. Don’t get down.

Let’s keep it light in here tonight people.

Smith Rising..


What can you say, I mean, Chicago came in to the game well-rested and the Oilers played last night. They were tired. Exhausted. Even so, a couple of those early posts find the twine and maybe this is a totally different game. It's hard to blame the Oilers for this loss, I mean, they took 37 shots at the opposite net. They just ran in to a hot goalie.

Can't really blame Tippett or Smith either. Smith's a battler, he wants back in the goal and then the coach has to go with his gut. His gut said Schmiddy. The last time Skinner played an NHL game he got blown out too, so it was really a coin toss between them. You just gotta trust experience, and Smith said he wanted this one, so what else could the team have done?



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799432 is a reply to message #799416 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stemhovlichski  is currently offline stemhovlichski
Messages: 349
Registered: March 2006
Location: NSR

No Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:02

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:35

That’s a good team over there guys. Don’t kid yourselves. Don’t get down.

Let’s keep it light in here tonight people.

Smith Rising..


What can you say, I mean, Chicago came in to the game well-rested and the Oilers played last night. They were tired. Exhausted. Even so, a couple of those early posts find the twine and maybe this is a totally different game. It's hard to blame the Oilers for this loss, I mean, they took 37 shots at the opposite net. They just ran in to a hot goalie.

Can't really blame Tippett or Smith either. Smith's a battler, he wants back in the goal and then the coach has to go with his gut. His gut said Schmiddy. The last time Skinner played an NHL game he got blown out too, so it was really a coin toss between them. You just gotta trust experience, and Smith said he wanted this one, so what else could the team have done?


So what you're saying is: This was a moral victory.



Restored: "We're sucking hind banana here." - Pat Quinn, Jan 18, 2010

"...the Oilers have been rebuilding for so long that it’s hard not to be cynical." - NBC's Ryan Dadoun Jan 2, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799436 is a reply to message #799402 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 00:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Slim Jim Phantom Call  is currently offline Slim Jim Phantom Call
Messages: 202
Registered: May 2002
Location: E-Ville

No Cups

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:35

That’s a good team over there guys. Don’t kid yourselves. Don’t get down.

Let’s keep it light in here tonight people.

Smith Rising..

How many years into Connor and Leon are we?
Lottery team.



In fairness to Hall, I've wanted to throw a waterbottle at Eakins all season.
~nullterm 03/22/2014

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799403 is a reply to message #799401 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Flames thumping the Knights 3-0 with 38 minutes remaining.

Oh joy.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799406 is a reply to message #799403 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1397
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 23:38

Flames thumping the Knights 3-0 with 38 minutes remaining.

Oh joy.


And the Stars up on Nashville.

The thought of Starting Smith on a back to back at any time this year would have been silly. To do it after that long of a layoff due to injury after putting up a stinker like he did last night? Not sure what to call that.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799408 is a reply to message #799403 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:38

Flames thumping the Knights 3-0 with 38 minutes remaining.

Oh joy.

4-0 now. Markstrom has faced 7 shots so far. It’s almost like defense matters too. Shrug.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799411 is a reply to message #799401 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Tip probably shouldn't coach this team anymore. Pull the trigger Kenny, and by rights you should pack your bags when the regular season is over, because there is zero indication this group will play beyond that.

Curious whether Holland thinks he's assembled a playoff team or not. If he does, then Tippett should be gone. If not, then he should resign.

McDavid 18 points in his last 20, which is about half production. I'd say he's got something going on physically but he played in the Allstar game and the fastest skater competition. He's been way more dominant playing with worse players. PP is colder than a whore's heart but WT F, not a good sign.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799429 is a reply to message #799411 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 22:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HamBlaster  is currently offline HamBlaster
Messages: 989
Registered: June 2007

No Cups

I'm becoming convinced more and more each day that McDavid is done here. End of the season, he's requesting a trade.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799413 is a reply to message #799401 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Honestly thought they would win this one.

https://i2.wp.com/i.giphy.com/media/0qGKYrubwcbaHbalR2/giphy.gif



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799414 is a reply to message #799413 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 20:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:54

Honestly thought they would win this one.

https://i2.wp.com/i.giphy.com/media/0qGKYrubwcbaHbalR2/giphy.gif


I thought they'd score 4, and somehow I didnt think they'd allow 4 on 25 or whatever shots. What's not broken or held together with gum and a bit of thread on this team right now? Anything?



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799415 is a reply to message #799401 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799417 is a reply to message #799415 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Quote:

Daniel Nugent-Bowman
@DNBsports

“This game is not on Smitty one bit.” — Dave Tippett, who reiterates they need to get him “up and running.”

Tippett, however, didn’t commit to starting Smith on Friday.


Gold.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799424 is a reply to message #799417 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nullterm  is currently offline nullterm
Messages: 1034
Registered: July 2007
Location: Port Moody, BC

1 Cup

Adam wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:07

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Quote:

Daniel Nugent-Bowman
@DNBsports

“This game is not on Smitty one bit.” — Dave Tippett, who reiterates they need to get him “up and running.”

Tippett, however, didn’t commit to starting Smith on Friday.


Gold.


What's the psychological trait where people keep making the same self destructive decisions over and over again despite all evidence to the contrary?



Illegitimi non carborundum.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799426 is a reply to message #799424 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 22:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

nullterm wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:59

Adam wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:07

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Quote:

Daniel Nugent-Bowman
@DNBsports

“This game is not on Smitty one bit.” — Dave Tippett, who reiterates they need to get him “up and running.”

Tippett, however, didn’t commit to starting Smith on Friday.


Gold.


What's the psychological trait where people keep making the same self destructive decisions over and over again despite all evidence to the contrary?


I think it's the same answer that keeps us all cheering on this hot mess of a hockey team.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799433 is a reply to message #799426 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 22:16

nullterm wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:59

Adam wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 20:07

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Quote:

Daniel Nugent-Bowman
@DNBsports

“This game is not on Smitty one bit.” — Dave Tippett, who reiterates they need to get him “up and running.”

Tippett, however, didn’t commit to starting Smith on Friday.


Gold.


What's the psychological trait where people keep making the same self destructive decisions over and over again despite all evidence to the contrary?


I think it's the same answer that keeps us all cheering on this hot mess of a hockey team.

No way. I’m stuck with the Oilers because of 35 years of history with the team and deep geographical roots. I don’t think I’m the smartest hockey fan in the room and that there are no alternatives to what I think about being a hockey fan.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799437 is a reply to message #799417 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 00:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Adam wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:07

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Quote:

Daniel Nugent-Bowman
@DNBsports

“This game is not on Smitty one bit.” — Dave Tippett, who reiterates they need to get him “up and running.”

Tippett, however, didn’t commit to starting Smith on Friday.


Gold.


Tippett shouldn't be in a position to make that decision on Friday.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799439 is a reply to message #799437 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 07:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NZ Oiler Fan  is currently offline NZ Oiler Fan
Messages: 1189
Registered: October 2006
Location: Kensington, PEI

1 Cup

Not defending the decision to play Smith in B2Bs by any means, but if it hadn't been for him that score would have been a whole lot uglier. I wouldn't mind seeing the high danger chances for stat for the Hawks that game. I suspect it would have been stupid high, as we were giving up 10 bell opportunities galore in the 1st & 3rd periods.

Tough to win games when you only score one goal over the past two games. Especially given that we seem to give up a minimum or 2-3 goals against each & every game. Do we even have a shutout this year? I can't remember one.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799454 is a reply to message #799439 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 09:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

NZ Oiler Fan wrote on Thu, 10 February 2022 07:24

Not defending the decision to play Smith in B2Bs by any means, but if it hadn't been for him that score would have been a whole lot uglier. I wouldn't mind seeing the high danger chances for stat for the Hawks that game. I suspect it would have been stupid high, as we were giving up 10 bell opportunities galore in the 1st & 3rd periods.

Tough to win games when you only score one goal over the past two games. Especially given that we seem to give up a minimum or 2-3 goals against each & every game. Do we even have a shutout this year? I can't remember one.

For whatever reason this team seems to gauge early its goaltending and sag because 'down early, loss' is a the narrative that's obviously crept in to their mindset as the prophecy continues to self fulfill.

Starts with the goaltenders sometimes its grade a chances given up in the defensive zone, but it starts there. The rest of the team sees that once again they're in a hole.

The team isn't as bad as their record. Aside from personnel needs that have been identified ad nauseum, they need to try a different voice in the room and behind the bench. When the Hart trophy guys are frankly diminishing and visibly sagging whether they want to or not, I think you do what you can to salvage the season....to me looking at McDavid, that's like beacons and sirens going off. I think the team benefits from a change at HC and possible an assistant, the goaltending coach. The benefits are systemic tweaks and quite frankly a wake up call from a voice or voices that sound different, simple as that.




Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799453 is a reply to message #799417 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 09:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1594
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

Adam wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 22:07

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Quote:

Daniel Nugent-Bowman
@DNBsports

“This game is not on Smitty one bit.” — Dave Tippett, who reiterates they need to get him “up and running.”

Tippett, however, didn’t commit to starting Smith on Friday.


Gold.


Apparently Holland agree with Tippett, the loss wasn't on Smith....



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799418 is a reply to message #799415 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Just want to remind everyone that you can never blame a goalie for losing a b2b game. It's a lot to ask of a goalie to play both of a b2b.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799420 is a reply to message #799418 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrudeRemarks  is currently offline CrudeRemarks
Messages: 1703
Registered: November 2010
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:07

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Just want to remind everyone that you can never blame a goalie for losing a b2b game. It's a lot to ask of a goalie to play both of a b2b.

A regular goalie maybe. This is the legendary Mike Smith. An ageless wonder only behind Tom Brady.



You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799421 is a reply to message #799420 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

CrudeRemarks wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:29

Kr55 wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:07

g2k wrote on Wed, 09 February 2022 21:01

Foegele had one of his better games tonight.

Tippett coming up on 1260. This should be the same.


Just want to remind everyone that you can never blame a goalie for losing a b2b game. It's a lot to ask of a goalie to play both of a b2b.

A regular goalie maybe. This is the legendary Mike Smith. An ageless wonder only behind Tom Brady.


On a serious note. I don't really blame Smith for those first 2 goals. Debrincat wide open shot after a cross ice pass that we just cluelessly allow to happen. Lots of net to shoot at since Smith has to come all the way across. That's a good goal. Next one is a typical rush goal, guy makes a good shot after Smith has to move. That goal happens all the time. We suck defensively. Don't play until we're down, it's the Oilers way. Then we can celebrate how everyone gets their head out of their butt after being down 0-2 and the other team starts to relax a bit. Been watching this on repeat for over a decade.




"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799423 is a reply to message #799420 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 21:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
watchman  is currently offline watchman
Messages: 1422
Registered: October 2019
Location: River City

1 Cup

"We gotta get Smitty going... He wants to be a big part of the team going forward"

One team looked like an NHL team out there. It wasn't the OIL. Clean, quick breakouts. Short passes to a teammate supporting the puck. Zero 2-zone hail-mary passes to no one in particular.

High from the nose-bleed section you could see the ease of entering the OZONE almost every time. Our D certainly like to back into the goalie. No resistance at the blue line. No back checking forwards... On the OIL PK the Hawks made countless cross passes to open attackers seemingly for fun.

TIPPETT's message (if there is one) hasn't been getting through for a long time now. Even with HOLLAND failing to solve the goaltending problem (remember "goaltending is 100% of the problem if you don't have it".) this team should be better.

'Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a change... TIPP's post game summary has been on repeat for too long.
'



...this time, it's for real (isn't it?).

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799434 is a reply to message #799401 ]
Wed, 09 February 2022 22:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rutuu  is currently offline Rutuu
Messages: 144
Registered: March 2011
Location: Brisbane

No Cups

Gotta go with your gut...and we've got the two best players in the world. We're building something special here.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799440 is a reply to message #799401 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 08:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Luckily I taped this.. only wasted 25 minutes.. as soon as it hit 3-1 it was FF by 5 min skip intervals..
Need a head on a plate.. start with Nicholson.. no particular reason.. just because.
I don't think you bring in Woody.. if you do, then decide on someone else at the end of the season, then he isn't going back to Bako.. so you lose 2 coaches.. I'd let Gully take it over.. I want to turf Playfair but don't want to bring up Manson for same reasons..

Golatending and defence still useless.. but then again scoring 1 goal isn't going to win any NHL games.

[Updated on: Thu, 10 February 2022 08:11]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799479 is a reply to message #799440 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 11:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
welcometotheOC  is currently offline welcometotheOC
Messages: 646
Registered: April 2010
Location: Also, sadly, Cowtown

No Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 10 February 2022 08:09

Luckily I taped this.. only wasted 25 minutes.. as soon as it hit 3-1 it was FF by 5 min skip intervals..
Need a head on a plate.. start with Nicholson.. no particular reason.. just because.
I don't think you bring in Woody.. if you do, then decide on someone else at the end of the season, then he isn't going back to Bako.. so you lose 2 coaches.. I'd let Gully take it over.. I want to turf Playfair but don't want to bring up Manson for same reasons..

Golatending and defence still useless.. but then again scoring 1 goal isn't going to win any NHL games.




That's been my modus operandi for a few years now - saving a LOT of time by not watching full Oiler games since early December



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44) [message #799545 is a reply to message #799479 ]
Thu, 10 February 2022 17:50 Go to previous message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

welcometotheOC wrote on Thu, 10 February 2022 11:07

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 10 February 2022 08:09

Luckily I taped this.. only wasted 25 minutes.. as soon as it hit 3-1 it was FF by 5 min skip intervals..
Need a head on a plate.. start with Nicholson.. no particular reason.. just because.
I don't think you bring in Woody.. if you do, then decide on someone else at the end of the season, then he isn't going back to Bako.. so you lose 2 coaches.. I'd let Gully take it over.. I want to turf Playfair but don't want to bring up Manson for same reasons..

Golatending and defence still useless.. but then again scoring 1 goal isn't going to win any NHL games.




That's been my modus operandi for a few years now - saving a LOT of time by not watching full Oiler games since early December


For while at least, I'm not checking out when it hits 2 nil, I want to see what the response is.



Send a private message to this user  

 
Previous Topic:Oilers Sign Brad Malone
Next Topic:GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #44)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca