| Review:
Edmonton @ Columbus (Game #61) [message #830618] |
Thu, 07 March 2024 19:30  |
|
|
 cpcos
Messages: 31
Registered: March 2013
No Cups
|
|
100% we won…. wow
We really love this team…
|
|
|
|
 |
Kr55
Messages: 10770
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton
6 Cups
|
|
I blame Columbus. Oilers were expecting an easy night. Columbus was rude and did not oblige. Just classless.
Almost lost Perry to an awkward hit, and Hyman had to take a full slapper off his leg as we chased the game all night after slacking off to start.
"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013
"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015
5 x $5,000,000
|
|
|
|
 |
watchman
Messages: 1412
Registered: October 2019
Location: River City
1 Cup
|
|
...apparently 30 minutes of hockey isn't enough. 
...this time, it's for real (isn't it?).
|
|
|
|
 |
oilfan94
Messages: 408
Registered: June 2006
Location: USA
No Cups
|
|
In 2006 after the Oilers got Roloson and Samsonov they immediately lost to Columbus. I'll take this as a sign.
|
|
|
|
 |
HamBlaster
Messages: 989
Registered: June 2007
No Cups
|
|
Whatever... it's one loss. They'll lose more before the end of the season.
That said, anyone that thinks this team is a contender or an SC favourite is kidding themself. Efforts like that show people how disjointed the Oilers can become and stay for prolonged periods of time. Against a team that brings the heat, hard and fast... the Oilers are going to get turnstiled.
|
|
|
|
 |
tardigrade81
Messages: 2262
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
2 Cups
|
|
It’s one less. Move on oilers. Shouldn’t have lost it, but it is what it is
|
|
|
|
 |
Skookum Jim
Messages: 4418
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
4 Cups
|
|
| oilfan94 wrote on Thu, 07 March 2024 18:42 |
In 2006 after the Oilers got Roloson and Samsonov they immediately lost to Columbus. I'll take this as a sign.
|
.. 👍🏻 
McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,
|
|
|
|
|
Skookum Jim
Messages: 4418
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
4 Cups
|
|
Dopey hockey, too much high risk puck handling.. Leon (getting some bad habits), Foegle Bouchard, Ceci, Nurse..
Leon especially lately, he takes off with the puck, gains the zone .. everyone else moving up with him skating forward.. he gets tracked down.. stops moving his legs.. then tries a low chance pass through legs and sticks that too often creates a turn over and goes the other way for an odd man chance against.. guy needs to keep moving.. he thinks he can post up during 5v5 like he does on the powerplay .. goes badly.
McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tardigrade81 wrote on Fri, 08 March 2024 02:44 |
It’s one less. Move on oilers. Shouldn’t have lost it, but it is what it is
|
Yep, like Taylor Swift says just shake it off.
|
|
|
|
|
tardigrade81
Messages: 2262
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
2 Cups
|
|
| oilfan94 wrote on Fri, 08 March 2024 02:42 |
In 2006 after the Oilers got Roloson and Samsonov they immediately lost to Columbus. I'll take this as a sign.
|
Lol that’s true
|
|
|
|
RDOilerfan
Messages: 3908
Registered: January 2016
3 Cups
|
|
I thought that was one of the worst games I have seen puck handling wise from guys who are usually pretty good.
McD, Leon, Bouch, all struggled to handle the puck. Put it behind you, move on.
They looked like a team that wasn't focused last night but more focused on new lines with 2 new players and wondering if one or 2 of their buddies will be there tomorrow.
[Updated on: Fri, 08 March 2024 08:13]
|
|
|
|
benv
Messages: 601
Registered: May 2006
Location: Edmonton
No Cups
|
|
Horrible game. Move on.
One thing that caught my attention: after McDavid got his 100th point of the season, the broadcasters talked about how it was his 7th 100 point campaign and he likely would have had eight in a row if the 19-20 season hadn't been stopped by COVID (he had 97 points when play was suspended).
By the NHLs logic shouldn't McDavid be considered to have gotten 100 points that year? If they can say that Neal got 20 goals for the purpose of awarding Calgary our third round pick, obviously McDavid's season easily pro-rated to well over 100 points.
So I think we should officially declare that McDavid in fact HAS gotten 8 straight 100 point seasons.
|
|
|
|
 |
Adam
Messages: 7176
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
6 Cups
|
|
| benv wrote on Fri, 08 March 2024 10:15 |
Horrible game. Move on.
One thing that caught my attention: after McDavid got his 100th point of the season, the broadcasters talked about how it was his 7th 100 point campaign and he likely would have had eight in a row if the 19-20 season hadn't been stopped by COVID (he had 97 points when play was suspended).
By the NHLs logic shouldn't McDavid be considered to have gotten 100 points that year? If they can say that Neal got 20 goals for the purpose of awarding Calgary our third round pick, obviously McDavid's season easily pro-rated to well over 100 points.
So I think we should officially declare that McDavid in fact HAS gotten 8 straight 100 point seasons.
|
There's an argument that the play-in round should have counted as regular season stats, rather than playoff stats given that it's a weird fifth round and there's a bunch of extra teams competing in it...McDavid had 9 points in those four games against Chicago.
"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks
|
|
|
|
