This day on November 26
None

Happy Birthday To: Hemskoreson, rb213, oilbaron1980, anjoo, MikeBro

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52)
Switch to nested viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800357]
Wed, 23 February 2022 19:59 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1561
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

3
5
Final

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win: 0%
Tampa Bay to win: 0%
0 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800368 is a reply to message #800357 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2343
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Entertainment value 12. Goaltending 0.

Pull the trigger Kenny. Wasting a season.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800370 is a reply to message #800357 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

I can’t believe the garbage the Bolts got away with.

Full on bush league



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800372 is a reply to message #800357 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2951
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Great game, Bad result.

D let Smith down but letting guys score from 2 feet twice. Oh and by scoring on him.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800373 is a reply to message #800372 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
watchman  is currently offline watchman
Messages: 1422
Registered: October 2019
Location: River City

1 Cup

NetBOG wrote on Wed, 23 February 2022 20:16

Great game, Bad result.

D let Smith down but letting guys score from 2 feet twice. Oh and by scoring on him.


...still, it was a pretty weak shot by SHORE. icon_rolleyes



...this time, it's for real (isn't it?).

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800374 is a reply to message #800373 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
watchman  is currently offline watchman
Messages: 1422
Registered: October 2019
Location: River City

1 Cup

8 goals on his last 22 shots! Defend that... icon_rolleyes


...this time, it's for real (isn't it?).

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800375 is a reply to message #800374 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

watchman wrote on Wed, 23 February 2022 20:26

8 goals on his last 22 shots! Defend that... icon_rolleyes

Yeah, double deflections and your own players skate are indefensible.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800376 is a reply to message #800374 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oilfann  is currently offline Oilfann
Messages: 72
Registered: December 2021
Location: Ontario

No Cups

watchman wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 03:26

8 goals on his last 22 shots! Defend that... icon_rolleyes


I could defend the goalies like i have on this goal or that goal saying this was tipped or 2 on one etc. But tending is I believe the worst in the league. Only so many excuses can be made. We need a new goalie. Smith and Koski need to go. We need a #1 and Skinner as the back up IMO. Holland will probably go get Korpisalo who is Koski 2.0 or maybe slightly worse.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800377 is a reply to message #800357 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 20:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrudeRemarks  is currently offline CrudeRemarks
Messages: 1703
Registered: November 2010
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

Now that he’s had his two game warm up you have to start the Battler again vs. Florida


You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800378 is a reply to message #800357 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 21:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

#FireWoodcroft


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800379 is a reply to message #800377 ]
Wed, 23 February 2022 21:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

CrudeRemarks wrote on Wed, 23 February 2022 20:55

Now that he’s had his two game warm up you have to start the Battler again vs. Florida

No no no no



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800390 is a reply to message #800357 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 02:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Skinner looking like the best bet of the bunch..


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800392 is a reply to message #800390 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 07:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1397
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 05:12

Skinner looking like the best bet of the bunch..


By a lot. It's not even close IMO.

Holland should pay whatever it costs to get someone like Varlamov from the Isles for Koskinen plus whoever. He's the right age, has been great everywhere he has played and has a year left after this one, so not just a rental. Then "retire" Smith.

I would be comfortable going in to the playoffs (assuming we make it) with a Varlamov/Skinner tandem.

I just don't see many other solid options from teams out of the playoff picture.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800396 is a reply to message #800392 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 08:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Mike wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 06:29

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 05:12

Skinner looking like the best bet of the bunch..


By a lot. It's not even close IMO.

Holland should pay whatever it costs to get someone like Varlamov from the Isles for Koskinen plus whoever. He's the right age, has been great everywhere he has played and has a year left after this one, so not just a rental. Then "retire" Smith.

I would be comfortable going in to the playoffs (assuming we make it) with a Varlamov/Skinner tandem.

I just don't see many other solid options from teams out of the playoff picture.



Half those goals going past Smith last night ar eones you might give a pass to in th eoccasional game.. but goals like that are becoming routine.. demoralizes a team the longer it goes on.. since his return from injury there is nothing in Smith's game that inspires confidence... collapses into his net as a default.



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800399 is a reply to message #800396 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 09:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1397
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 11:51

Mike wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 06:29

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 05:12

Skinner looking like the best bet of the bunch..


By a lot. It's not even close IMO.

Holland should pay whatever it costs to get someone like Varlamov from the Isles for Koskinen plus whoever. He's the right age, has been great everywhere he has played and has a year left after this one, so not just a rental. Then "retire" Smith.

I would be comfortable going in to the playoffs (assuming we make it) with a Varlamov/Skinner tandem.

I just don't see many other solid options from teams out of the playoff picture.



Half those goals going past Smith last night ar eones you might give a pass to in th eoccasional game.. but goals like that are becoming routine.. demoralizes a team the longer it goes on.. since his return from injury there is nothing in Smith's game that inspires confidence... collapses into his net as a default.


Yeah, in a vacuum, a lot of those goals weren't terrible, but the fact is in 13 starts he has 7 in which he let in 4 or more and finished under .900 (including .429 and .818 in the last 2). It's not the exception at this point. We are going nowhere with those 2.





Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800400 is a reply to message #800399 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 10:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Mike wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 09:11

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 11:51

Mike wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 06:29

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 05:12

Skinner looking like the best bet of the bunch..


By a lot. It's not even close IMO.

Holland should pay whatever it costs to get someone like Varlamov from the Isles for Koskinen plus whoever. He's the right age, has been great everywhere he has played and has a year left after this one, so not just a rental. Then "retire" Smith.

I would be comfortable going in to the playoffs (assuming we make it) with a Varlamov/Skinner tandem.

I just don't see many other solid options from teams out of the playoff picture.



Half those goals going past Smith last night ar eones you might give a pass to in th eoccasional game.. but goals like that are becoming routine.. demoralizes a team the longer it goes on.. since his return from injury there is nothing in Smith's game that inspires confidence... collapses into his net as a default.


Yeah, in a vacuum, a lot of those goals weren't terrible, but the fact is in 13 starts he has 7 in which he let in 4 or more and finished under .900 (including .429 and .818 in the last 2). It's not the exception at this point. We are going nowhere with those 2.




I don't think Koskinen should be dismissed because Smith has underperformed this year. Koskinen has been pretty good when utilized as a back up with an appropriate amount of playing time.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800401 is a reply to message #800400 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 10:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dragon_Matt  is currently offline Dragon_Matt
Messages: 766
Registered: January 2009
Location: edmonton

No Cups

Koski stats for 2021
games played 28
games started 26
wins 17
losses 8
OT loss 2
saves 839 (about 30 shots per game)
goals against 85
GAA 3.13
Save % .899

not exactly inspiring confidence himself.

Average save % is .913 this year
average GAA is 2.84

Koskinen has won games because we can outscore opponents. Not because he has been good.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800403 is a reply to message #800401 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 10:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Dragon_Matt wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 10:31

Koski stats for 2021
games played 28
games started 26
wins 17
losses 8
OT loss 2
saves 839 (about 30 shots per game)
goals against 85
GAA 3.13
Save % .899

not exactly inspiring confidence himself.

Average save % is .913 this year
average GAA is 2.84

Koskinen has won games because we can outscore opponents. Not because he has been good.

Eye test man. Of course I could be wrong because I haven't bothered to look at his game log. But I felt he played pretty well for the first half dozen games after Smith got hurt the first time. Then the coach overplayed him and Koskinen went into a steep decline. Everyone in the organization seemed to get made at Koskinen for not being a full time starter with no backup so Tippett put him on the shelf and didn't play him for, ah hell, I'm going to look up games.

Game and Save %

Oct 19 - .952 (relief)
Oct 21 - .964
Oct 22 - .923
Oct 27 - .879
Oct 30 - .967
Nov 01 - .931
Nov 03 - .939
Nov 05 - .800
Nov 11 - .897
Nov 14 - .897
Nov 16 - .846
Nov 24 - .889
Nov 27 - .947
Dec 01 - .941
Dec 05 - .875
Dec 07 - .846
Dec 11 - .903
Dec 14 - .800
Jan 01 - .897 (relief)
Jan 03 - .857
Jan 20 - .786
Jan 22 - .936
Jan 25 - .926
Jan 27 - .933
Jan 31 - .903
Feb 02 - .889
Feb 19 - .917
Feb 20 - .800 (relief)

To me that shows a strong start and a steep decline around his 11th(!) consecutive game. Then when Smith came back (plus covid) and he played two games in 5 weeks, one in relief. He struggled in limited action. Starting Jan 20, he started to play more, but not all the time, and has been pretty good. I'm not saying he should start or be re-signed, but he should have been used better and hasn't been awful.

I'd let Skinnnnnnner season in Bako, he's there if we need him. Koskinen should be able to perform as a 40% backup behind a healthy starter.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800406 is a reply to message #800392 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 12:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Mike wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 07:29

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 05:12

Skinner looking like the best bet of the bunch..


By a lot. It's not even close IMO.

Holland should pay whatever it costs to get someone like Varlamov from the Isles for Koskinen plus whoever. He's the right age, has been great everywhere he has played and has a year left after this one, so not just a rental.




Would you include Bison King?



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800407 is a reply to message #800377 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 12:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

CrudeRemarks wrote on Wed, 23 February 2022 20:55

Now that he’s had his two game warm up you have to start the Battler again vs. Florida

Precisely. You just can't tromp those old carbureted big blocks to the floor off the start. They will sputter and pop. You need to feather the throttle a bit when you spring the clutch.

Schmiddy can't just turn the battle dial to 11 off the hop. Last night was 6.7. Stay patient Oilfans. This is a process. A part of the process of "Schmiddy Rising". The answers are in that room, just like Dutchie stated.

Step in line you fickle effers.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800409 is a reply to message #800407 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 13:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dragon_Matt  is currently offline Dragon_Matt
Messages: 766
Registered: January 2009
Location: edmonton

No Cups

He'll be better in year two. It's a contract year after all.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800411 is a reply to message #800409 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 14:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Dragon_Matt wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 13:47

He'll be better in year two. It's a contract year after all.


Smith didn't sign here just to see what would happen in year 1. He was so excited about what we were building he was happy to accept our offer of a 2nd year, and maybe even beyond!



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800412 is a reply to message #800403 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 16:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrudeRemarks  is currently offline CrudeRemarks
Messages: 1703
Registered: November 2010
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 10:48

Dragon_Matt wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 10:31

Koski stats for 2021
games played 28
games started 26
wins 17
losses 8
OT loss 2
saves 839 (about 30 shots per game)
goals against 85
GAA 3.13
Save % .899

not exactly inspiring confidence himself.

Average save % is .913 this year
average GAA is 2.84

Koskinen has won games because we can outscore opponents. Not because he has been good.

Eye test man. Of course I could be wrong because I haven't bothered to look at his game log. But I felt he played pretty well for the first half dozen games after Smith got hurt the first time. Then the coach overplayed him and Koskinen went into a steep decline. Everyone in the organization seemed to get made at Koskinen for not being a full time starter with no backup so Tippett put him on the shelf and didn't play him for, ah hell, I'm going to look up games.

Game and Save %

Oct 19 - .952 (relief)
Oct 21 - .964
Oct 22 - .923
Oct 27 - .879
Oct 30 - .967
Nov 01 - .931
Nov 03 - .939
Nov 05 - .800
Nov 11 - .897
Nov 14 - .897
Nov 16 - .846
Nov 24 - .889
Nov 27 - .947
Dec 01 - .941
Dec 05 - .875
Dec 07 - .846
Dec 11 - .903
Dec 14 - .800
Jan 01 - .897 (relief)
Jan 03 - .857
Jan 20 - .786
Jan 22 - .936
Jan 25 - .926
Jan 27 - .933
Jan 31 - .903
Feb 02 - .889
Feb 19 - .917
Feb 20 - .800 (relief)

To me that shows a strong start and a steep decline around his 11th(!) consecutive game. Then when Smith came back (plus covid) and he played two games in 5 weeks, one in relief. He struggled in limited action. Starting Jan 20, he started to play more, but not all the time, and has been pretty good. I'm not saying he should start or be re-signed, but he should have been used better and hasn't been awful.

I'd let Skinnnnnnner season in Bako, he's there if we need him. Koskinen should be able to perform as a 40% backup behind a healthy starter.

It’s funny, on a hypothetical well-run team where he’s paid back up money and playing behind a starter, Koski could have been a really good second option for back to back games or the odd night off for the number one guy. Even an attractive trade piece. Unfortunately we live in Edmonton.



You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you can get a lottery pick.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52) [message #800417 is a reply to message #800412 ]
Thu, 24 February 2022 18:25 Go to previous message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

CrudeRemarks wrote on Thu, 24 February 2022 16:45


It’s funny, on a hypothetical well-run team where he’s paid back up money and playing behind a starter, Koski could have been a really good second option for back to back games or the odd night off for the number one guy. Even an attractive trade piece. Unfortunately we live in Edmonton.

Imagine a Markstrom / Markstrom / Koskinen / Markstrom / Koskinen rotation.

Kuemper? Fluery? Ulmark? Driedger? Anderson? Reimer? The were options.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 
Previous Topic:Pregame: Edmonton @ Florida (Game #53)
Next Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Tampa Bay (Game #52)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca