This day on November 22
Acquired: Kari Takko (1990)
Departed: Bruce Bell (1990)

Happy Birthday To: SAE_10W30, Radville, Flavs93

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69)
Switch to nested viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732795]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:05 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1558
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

2
3
Final (OT)


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732796 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2948
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Wooooo. Game #69. You know what i mean, baby.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732797 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
overdue  is currently offline overdue
Messages: 493
Registered: October 2014

No Cups

Gorgiev in goal. They're not taking us serious.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732798 is a reply to message #732797 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1594
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

overdue wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:10

Gorgiev in goal. They're not taking us serious.


As with many of the last dozen seasons we will be seeing a lot of backups play the Oilers from now on.
There is really no reason to play your starter in this game when the game right before and/or after are likely against better teams.



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732799 is a reply to message #732798 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
overdue  is currently offline overdue
Messages: 493
Registered: October 2014

No Cups

Sad but true ! How are we suppose to do a good job of tanking if that's the case ?


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732800 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2948
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Hey Sportsnet, If you're going to show a replay and ask us to see how close that was to going in, how 'bout you actually give us a replay showing how close that was to going in.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732801 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2948
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Not sure why they are challenging this one. He clearly whacked the goalie.

***Edit - Clearly they saw something different



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732802 is a reply to message #732801 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NZ Oiler Fan  is currently offline NZ Oiler Fan
Messages: 1189
Registered: October 2006
Location: Kensington, PEI

1 Cup

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 22:24

Not sure why they are challenging this one. He clearly whacked the goalie.

***Edit - Clearly they saw something different


Rangers commentators figure it was the Rangers player's stick that made primary contact with the goalie. Said Kass hit him after though.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732803 is a reply to message #732801 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1594
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:24

Not sure why they are challenging this one. He clearly whacked the goalie.

***Edit - Clearly they saw something different


I honestly dont even question anymore as I always seem to get it wrong.

watching the NYR broadcast and they seem baffled that it was a goal.

It is almost like every single outward explanation of the rule is different than what the refs use to decide.

At this point I would almost challenge every time as you never know. Nothing to lose but a time out that is often of low value.



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732804 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2948
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

I think Klef just got nutted. At least its not a finger or an ankle or some dumb thing that'll keep him out.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732805 is a reply to message #732804 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:34

I think Klef just got nutted. At least its not a finger or an ankle or some dumb thing that'll keep him out.


Took it square in the sexbombs



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732806 is a reply to message #732803 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:27

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:24

Not sure why they are challenging this one. He clearly whacked the goalie.

***Edit - Clearly they saw something different


I honestly dont even question anymore as I always seem to get it wrong.

watching the NYR broadcast and they seem baffled that it was a goal.

It is almost like every single outward explanation of the rule is different than what the refs use to decide.

At this point I would almost challenge every time as you never know. Nothing to lose but a time out that is often of low value.


I thought you get a penalty for a failed challenge? Or am I drunk already?



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732807 is a reply to message #732803 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NZ Oiler Fan  is currently offline NZ Oiler Fan
Messages: 1189
Registered: October 2006
Location: Kensington, PEI

1 Cup

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 22:27

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:24

Not sure why they are challenging this one. He clearly whacked the goalie.

***Edit - Clearly they saw something different


I honestly dont even question anymore as I always seem to get it wrong.

watching the NYR broadcast and they seem baffled that it was a goal.

It is almost like every single outward explanation of the rule is different than what the refs use to decide.

At this point I would almost challenge every time as you never know. Nothing to lose but a time out that is often of low value.


Oh wow, new angle slow-mo replay just clearly showed it was a Rangers stick that hit the goalie. Kass didn't touch him. Bravo Oilers coaching staff to make that challenge!



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732808 is a reply to message #732806 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 19:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NZ Oiler Fan  is currently offline NZ Oiler Fan
Messages: 1189
Registered: October 2006
Location: Kensington, PEI

1 Cup

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 22:40

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:27

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 19:24

Not sure why they are challenging this one. He clearly whacked the goalie.

***Edit - Clearly they saw something different


I honestly dont even question anymore as I always seem to get it wrong.

watching the NYR broadcast and they seem baffled that it was a goal.

It is almost like every single outward explanation of the rule is different than what the refs use to decide.

At this point I would almost challenge every time as you never know. Nothing to lose but a time out that is often of low value.


I thought you get a penalty for a failed challenge? Or am I drunk already?


Only on offsides



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732809 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 20:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

So Klefbom not on the bench... anyone wanna wager that he’ll need the Grebeshkov man purse coin repair surgery?


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732810 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 20:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2948
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Everywhere else it's coming up Oilers. Don't mess this up guys.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732811 is a reply to message #732810 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 20:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55 is currently online Kr55
Messages: 10770
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 20:33

Everywhere else it's coming up Oilers. Don't mess this up guys.


Half the #69 is complete! But will the Oilers do their part? Or will they just be satisfied with what the other half did and go to sleep?



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732812 is a reply to message #732811 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 20:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7803
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Does lucic actually have an injury or is it an “injury”?


Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732813 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 21:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Nice head shot on Benning.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732814 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 21:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2948
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Nurse casually gliding to the end boards while Namestinkoff comes flying in. You've got to play like you want to win and show some energy.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732816 is a reply to message #732813 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 21:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5911
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

g2k wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 21:10

Nice head shot on Benning.


Parros says clean hit



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732817 is a reply to message #732795 ]
Mon, 11 March 2019 21:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Please don’t let this be decided in the shoot out.

Edit: nope



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732836 is a reply to message #732816 ]
Tue, 12 March 2019 01:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4418
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 20:44

g2k wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 21:10

Nice head shot on Benning.


Parros says clean hit


Parros is as dumb as a rotting stump.



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69) [message #732844 is a reply to message #732836 ]
Tue, 12 March 2019 08:36 Go to previous message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7175
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 12 March 2019 01:25

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 20:44

g2k wrote on Mon, 11 March 2019 21:10

Nice head shot on Benning.


Parros says clean hit


Parros is as dumb as a rotting stump.


It would have been a headshot if Zuccarello delivered it, but not some no-name third liner. Those are the guys that Parros feels really need protection.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 
Previous Topic:Review: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69)
Next Topic:Pregame: N.Y. Rangers @ Edmonton (Game #69)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca