 |
Adam Messages: 7757
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
6 Cups
|
|
| Skookum Jim wrote on Mon, 19 January 2026 14:48 |
| inverno76 wrote on Mon, 19 January 2026 13:12 |
| Skookum Jim wrote on Mon, 19 January 2026 13:11 | With Kapanen down and keeping 3 goalies.. now is the chance to try the "Darnel Experiment".. run him as a winger instead of the team going 11F x 7D .. unlock some of that 9.25 value! Power Forward !
|
Honestly, he has the potential to look good as a forward. Skates well, physical specimen, and less responsibility on the wing opposed to D, but for some reason I feel like he would be a soft forward to play against. He'd likely play like a finesse forward instead of wrecking ball of physicality.
|
Agree he's no Tom Wilson.. and doesn't have the grade A shot or hands.. but I think he could be a net front.. he can skate forwards ok (better than Fred) .. just not very agile .. like pivots.. which kills him defending rushes.. it'd be a fun experiment.. call it "Project X-25" :)
|
I think we should level set on expectations around Kasperi Kapanen. He has had one 40+ point season, and that was in his first full season in the league in 2018-19. He's only cracked 15 goals once in the time since (a split year between Pittsburgh and St.Louis in 2022-23.
He has had a great run in limited time this year with 9 points in 14 games, but that's so far outside his norm that I think we should look at that as a pleasant anomaly. He's a spot-filler in the top-6 and he's historically had pretty poor fancy stats, so ideally he's playing down the lineup at best.
I would love to be wrong there, but I think better to be realistic. He's 29 years old, so it's unlikely he's going to suddenly blossom here at this point in his career.
"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks
|
|
|
|
Review:
St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: OilFans on Sun, 18 January 2026 20:30 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Mike on Sun, 18 January 2026 20:54 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Kr55 on Sun, 18 January 2026 21:28 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Adam on Mon, 19 January 2026 11:22 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: smyth260 on Sun, 18 January 2026 20:55 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Leia on Sun, 18 January 2026 20:56 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Mike on Mon, 19 January 2026 06:48 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Jay on Mon, 19 January 2026 09:34 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Adam on Mon, 19 January 2026 11:18 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
|
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Adam on Mon, 19 January 2026 15:38 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 19 January 2026 15:56 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 January 2026 11:20 |
Re: Review: St. Louis @ Edmonton (Game #50) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 January 2026 11:30 |