 |
 Kr55
Messages: 12882
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton
6 Cups
|
|
| Adam wrote on Tue, 20 August 2024 11:58 |
| nullterm wrote on Tue, 20 August 2024 11:50 |
| CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 20 August 2024 10:43 |
| Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 20 August 2024 11:39 |
Brutal.
Two 1st rounders.. developed into NHL players.. gone for nothing..
Had the cap space.. choose to do nothing.. big loss in roster value for the franchise..
Have no idea now why they traded Ceci when they did.
|
Trading Ceci at a time when they had no leverage and knew they needed someone to fill his spot is the part that I don't understand. Losing a couple of prospects because of cap troubles and not overpaying is mostly fine. But why trade Ceci now?
Is there a new capfriendly site?
|
Yeah, the Ceci trade is now a big w.t.f in hindsight (except for people that didn't like his play).
Maybe if that Emberson kid pans out it makes sense.
And, https://puckpedia.com/team/edmonton-oilers
|
That's a player in full decline with a $3.25MM contract for this year. He can't possibly live up to that deal, so trading him is a net benefit.
Having the ability to match the offer was probably pretty key in negotiating the additional compensation from St. Louis. A 3rd in 2028 and a 19-year old former 5th round pick are not huge pieces, but they are better than just a 2nd and a 3rd alone for those two players.
We now have room to buy if there's a piece that's worth acquiring. If we find someone who's a top-4 RHD, we can just act without trying to find a way to park a contract to make it work. There's a real value to that.
Finally, if the team doesn't make any more moves, they can start the season with Kane on the roster and then put him on LTIR. I don't quite understand the mechanics, but that's better for the Oilers than if they put him on LTIR before the season.
I think Emberton is a pretty good gamble and may be better than Ceci as early as now.
|
I think LTIR before season, your cap limit becomes your current roster + Kane's cap hit. Which could be lower than the normal cap limit + Kane's cap.
So, say you need to be 2M over the cap (90M) to start the season and need to use Kane's LTIR to be under the limit, you actually only get +2M on the 88M cap to work with to start the year. Your cap limit is 90M until Kane comes off LTIR (you need to move 2M out to do that) and resets your limit to 88M.
But, say you are at 88M or under, including Kane, and don't need Kane on LTIR to start the year. You go into the year with the normal 88M limit, and then can LTIR Kane to have the full 5.125M of extra space.
I think that's how it works at least. Basically it's a punishment for not being able to be under the cap to start the year without using LTIR.
"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013
"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015
5 x $5,000,000
|
|
|
|
Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 August 2024 08:44 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: oilfan94 on Tue, 20 August 2024 08:50 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 20 August 2024 08:50 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 09:37 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 August 2024 09:57 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 10:25 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: benv on Tue, 20 August 2024 09:30 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: nullterm on Tue, 20 August 2024 11:50 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 11:52 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 August 2024 11:58 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 12:03 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adrean on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:00 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 11:44 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 20 August 2024 12:11 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 August 2024 12:07 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 20 August 2024 12:35 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 August 2024 12:46 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:30 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:44 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:55 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 23:25 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Wed, 21 August 2024 09:25 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:08 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:11 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:30 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:34 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 20 August 2024 13:39 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: NetBOG on Tue, 20 August 2024 14:31 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Mike on Tue, 20 August 2024 17:48 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: smyth260 on Wed, 21 August 2024 10:10 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Mike on Wed, 21 August 2024 12:42 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Wed, 21 August 2024 13:40 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: oilfan94 on Wed, 21 August 2024 15:02 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Wed, 21 August 2024 16:08 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Wed, 21 August 2024 16:31 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Sat, 24 August 2024 12:19 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Adam on Sat, 24 August 2024 14:35 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Sat, 24 August 2024 19:06 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Mike on Sat, 24 August 2024 20:47 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
By: Kr55 on Sat, 24 August 2024 21:23 |
|
Re: Broberg and Holloway GONE |
|
