 |
Adam Messages: 7757
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
6 Cups
|
|
| Kr55 wrote on Thu, 14 December 2023 09:43 |
| Mike wrote on Thu, 14 December 2023 06:41 |
| Adam wrote on Wed, 13 December 2023 18:57 |
| inverno76 wrote on Wed, 13 December 2023 12:53 |
| g2k wrote on Wed, 13 December 2023 10:43 |
| Kr55 wrote on Tue, 12 December 2023 23:22 | Connor Brown the only consistently useless Oiler Dead last tonight analytically and visually.
|
Was 14 rows behind the bench last night. Draisaitl was visibly agitated about something after some shifts. Pissy, if you will.
Brown looks like a career AHL'er filling in due to a raft of injuries. He's starkly out of place out there.
|
If Brown could be traded, would the bonus follow him to the acquiring team?
|
I'm not certain - but I think it might be pro-rated.
|
Should most definitely be looked at. Like now. If it's pro-rated, we've played just over 30% of the season, so we could save $2.2M next year? That's worth a pick at least IMO. 1 assist and a team worst -8 in 20 games. If the bonus does follow him out the door, they really need to pay the price to flush this mistake sooner rather than later.
|
Looks like team bonus is hit with pays 100%
Jagr 14/15. Jagr had a 45 game 2M bonus. He was traded to Florida after 57 games played. Lucky Lou confirmed Jersey pays it all.
https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/12388464/florida-panther s-acquire-jaromir-jagr-new-jersey-devils-two-draft-picks
The Panthers will pick up the full prorated remainder of Jagr's $3.5 million salary, but the Devils are responsible for his $2 million games-played bonus, which he has already achieved, Lamoriello confirmed to ESPN.com's Pierre LeBrun.
|
The Oilers would have had to pay it - but would the cap hit be pro-rated?
And I don't know who would take Brown now. 0-1-1 playing mostly top-6 minutes with the best players in the league? How do you convince anyone that they should trade for him? Other than packaging good assets with him.
"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks
|
|
|
|
Review:
Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: OilFans on Tue, 12 December 2023 22:30 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
|
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 12 December 2023 23:22 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: g2k on Wed, 13 December 2023 10:43 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
|
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Kr55 on Wed, 13 December 2023 17:50 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Adam on Wed, 13 December 2023 11:30 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: smyth260 on Wed, 13 December 2023 12:15 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: g2k on Wed, 13 December 2023 17:29 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: g2k on Wed, 13 December 2023 17:39 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Adam on Thu, 14 December 2023 10:49 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: K.McC#24 on Wed, 13 December 2023 12:18 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
|
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Adam on Wed, 13 December 2023 15:57 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Mike on Thu, 14 December 2023 06:41 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Kr55 on Thu, 14 December 2023 09:43 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Adam on Thu, 14 December 2023 10:51 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
|
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: NetBOG on Thu, 14 December 2023 11:08 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: NetBOG on Wed, 13 December 2023 04:06 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
|
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
By: Mike on Wed, 13 December 2023 06:08 |
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
|
Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #26) |
|