 |
CrusaderPi Messages: 8140
Registered: December 2003
Location: Downtown Edmonton
6 Cups
|
|
| RDOilerfan wrote on Tue, 18 April 2023 09:50 |
| CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 18 April 2023 09:08 |
| RDOilerfan wrote on Tue, 18 April 2023 08:31 |
I thought the refs played a HUGE role in the game. First period I think it was Foegele got a goal called back for goalie interference. Did he hit into the goalie that probably helped the goal? 100% yes. But I would like to know from the league, what was he supposed to do? He was driving the net to go after the puck which is allowed and part of the game. A Kings player from behind jumps on his back and drives him to the ice into his goalie. So you penalize the Oilers player for being unable to support a 200+ lbs King defender laying on his back? I am fine with the goal being called back, I just would like to hear for future situations, what you expect a person to do in that situation so it counts next time. The answer can't be there is nothing you can do, just accept it.
|
The answer is 100% there is nothing to do in that situation and we should just accept it. Foegele couldn't score a legal goal there without interfering with the goaltend. I actually think he should have had a goaltender interference penalty called on him and the Oilers got away with a free shot. He both impaired the goaltenders ability to make a play and initiated contact with the goalie which are the two criteria for a penalty, either of which results in a penalty.
|
I agree. Foegele did fall into Korpisalo and it contributed to the goal. I just find it extremely frustrating because there was no fault by him. If a player does something wrong, they should be penalized for it. He did is job, he went to the net, if he doesn't get touched, nothing happens. He gets drilled from behind and the defender pushed him towards his goalie. Sometimes if there is contact a player can make sure he falls a certain way. This wasn't the case. There was no way he could have gotten out of the way of the goalie with what the Kings players did to him and it cost the team a goal. I get why the goal was called off, I just don't think it's right. It was 100% the Kings players fault his goalie was interfered with so why do the Kings get a call that benefits them completely. The Oilers didn't even get a PP out of it. The King drilled a player in the back, that's a penalty.
|
I did put the blame on Foegele. He drove the net when he didn't have position. I thought he was making his dive at the net (iirc) before he was hit. Like I said, he should have got the penalty.
I couldn't find a clip so this is all from memory, but this was the prevailing conversation from the couch last night.
Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.
|
|
|
|
Review:
Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: OilFans on Mon, 17 April 2023 22:30 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: g2k on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:12 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: NetBOG on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:30 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: smyth260 on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:34 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:35 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: smyth260 on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:38 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: NetBOG on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:38 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:41 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 17 April 2023 23:32 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 18 April 2023 00:20 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Mike on Tue, 18 April 2023 06:17 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Adam on Tue, 18 April 2023 10:45 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: K.McC#24 on Tue, 18 April 2023 19:12 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: K.McC#24 on Tue, 18 April 2023 10:46 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Mike on Wed, 19 April 2023 07:06 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Adam on Wed, 19 April 2023 13:16 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Adam on Wed, 19 April 2023 13:21 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: PlusOne on Wed, 19 April 2023 18:35 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
|
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Adam on Wed, 19 April 2023 21:11 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: PlusOne on Wed, 19 April 2023 21:49 |
Re: Review: Los Angeles @ Edmonton (Game #1) |
By: Adam on Wed, 19 April 2023 22:00 |