WoodGuy goes deep on Janmark.

https://twitter.com/Woodguy55/status/1548751951382188032?t=m h9yM4o4tVZD5dE2atyujg&s=19

Quote:

Woodguy@Woodguy55 Quick thread on Janmark. I was looking at him the other day so I had all this stuff handy and thought I'd share it. 1) PK TOI/gm and where he slotted among forwards. He was 2nd PK unit until he got VGK where he went to the 3rd unit. Certainly "a PKer" (1/

Quote:

2. Spot on the roster via QoC and results vs other team's Elites: 3rd liner last 3 years. Results vs Elites compared to team mates was positive until he got to VGK, but improved in his full season there. Good results here for a bottom 6 F imo.

Quote:

3. Effect on team mates using @EvolvingHockey 's Relative to Team Mates for both Actual Goal Share and Expected Goal Share. Lots of red here, especially on Actual Goals. Not uncommon for bottom 6 F's to show like this due to the effect of Dmen having better...(3/

Quote:

...better Goal/xGoal results with top 6 players. Fancies are better than Actual. His influence is a bit better on defence than on offence in both goals and x/goals Not good, but still a step up from Archibald, who he replaced on the roster (4/

Quote:

4. Faceoffs. Janmark is listed as a C, but if he played C in the NHL it hasn't been since 18/19. His volume of face offs taken tells us that "he's the winger who takes the draw when the C is kicked out" (5/

Quote:

In all he looks like an "decent enough" bottom 6 F who can play 2PK. At $1.25MM/1yr in the NHL that's reasonable value I think. Reasonable signing. I haven't dug into who is out there still so can't say "oohhh, they should have grabbed "this guy"", but not bad. (6/6)

McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World