This day on April 27
None

Happy Birthday To: chickenman23, handsmatter94, TashOiler88

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4)
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851951]
Sun, 26 April 2026 22:00 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 2062
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

2 Cups

3
4
Final (OT)

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win: 75%
Anaheim to win: 25%
8 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851962 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 22:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 4474
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

4 Cups

Game over. Series over


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851965 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 6097
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

6 Cups

Classic Oilers


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851966 is a reply to message #851965 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 4474
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

4 Cups

Garbage this year. Just no words


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851968 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 12816
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

The pinnacle of nurse’s career


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851971 is a reply to message #851968 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 22:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 1304
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

Knob might want to waste one on the refs in his post game. Time to blow up. Its now or never and he's done if they lose this series anyway.

Completely corrupt officiating and no accountability.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851972 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 23:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NCREDiBLE  is currently offline NCREDiBLE
Messages: 270
Registered: February 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB

No Cups

This cards were in place to win it this year however,

We had a piss poor trade deadline.
(Yes, Dickinson is a hell of a pickup but we had to overpay to clean up a mess)

Florida doesn’t make it finally it was wide open.
Anaheim was 2-8 in their final 10 games and have out coached us.

Every year it seems like the secondary scoring isn’t there and now this year it’s there and McDavid and Leon are quiet especially McDavid.

Jarry despite the loss played solid and the defence left him to dry many times.
(Really should still have Kulak back there)
Stupid penalties costing us.

The good?
Kap and Dicky look great

Knob is gone, Bowman won’t be but should be.
Bring in Bruce Cassidy as our coach.

Emotions running high right now but this is extremely frustrating hockey.

[Updated on: Sun, 26 April 2026 23:05]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851973 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 23:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 6097
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

6 Cups

That puck never crossed the line. Period

The league has finally gone full retard trying to fix games and series .. not even trying to pretend now.

This is the guy that called it a goal when he could never have seen it go in from where he was standing.. in fact he did not call a goal as he came to the net.. he didn't see it .. he could not physically have seen it at all.. impossible.. then after the fact he's allowed to later call it a goal on the ice .. its a made up call.. he never saw it. . so when the video review is unable to prove its a goal.. no clear evidence.. the made up on ice call .. becomes the call.

I think these guys huddled and decided to do this by design.. none of them saw it go in.. so if there wasn't any video evidence either way.. their call of a goal stands

https://gcdnb.pbrd.co/images/85BKJWMmF2On.png

[Updated on: Sun, 26 April 2026 23:24]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851974 is a reply to message #851973 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 23:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NCREDiBLE  is currently offline NCREDiBLE
Messages: 270
Registered: February 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB

No Cups

As bad as I want to agree, to me it clearly was across but if the rule states you must fully see it without blockage than it shouldn’t have counted.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851975 is a reply to message #851974 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 23:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 6097
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

6 Cups

NCREDiBLE wrote on Sun, 26 April 2026 22:17

As bad as I want to agree, to me it clearly was across but if the rule states you must fully see it without blockage than it shouldn’t have counted.



We've seen many goals that "might" be over the line that have never counted because the video isn't definitive.. the refs never call it a goal if they didn't actually see it go in.. never happens.. never mind game 4 OT goals in the NHL playoffs..

As well.. the camera angle makes a huge difference.. from the camera angle behind net the puck can look like it would be across but edge actually isn't .. there's about a 25 degree angle .. that's why they don't normally allow these types of goals unless you can actually see the ice side edge of the puck clearly over the red.. and showing white.

Oilers and our fans were robbed of a win and likely a series.

[Updated on: Sun, 26 April 2026 23:36]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851976 is a reply to message #851974 ]
Sun, 26 April 2026 23:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1995
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

I believe the puck crossed the line. I mean screenshot it and pencil in the lines and I’m sure you’ll see that it’s over the line. But that’s not the point - absolutely zero chance he saw it in the next from where he was. Not to mention that at no point did he signal a goal. And the goal light didn’t go on. There is zero plausible explanation for calling it a goal on the ice.

As for this team - even if we do stage a comeback against these guys, no chance this team gets by the central division.

What a joke of a management team. Chatting with someone tonight and went to look at McDavid’s decade of playoff goalies…quite the list:

Talbot
Smith
Koskinen
Skinner
Pickard
Campbell
Ingram
Jarry

Pathetic.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851977 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 05:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rowan Oil Fielding  is currently offline Rowan Oil Fielding
Messages: 497
Registered: July 2018

No Cups

https://i.postimg.cc/vHnW60h0/Matt-Hughes.gif


https://i.postimg.cc/mZ9GD3V6/php2-CH3-Yf-AM.jpg

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851978 is a reply to message #851977 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 06:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 4474
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

4 Cups

Hats off to Anaheim. I knew this would be a tough series. I said at the beginning I think it will go to game six. They are just playing like a very young and energetic team. Oilers are playing like they are lazy and want to go home. We are scoring enough, but the careless mistakes and horrible defense. It’s pathetic to watch. Jarry had a great game, and we still couldn’t win.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851979 is a reply to message #851978 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 07:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 1304
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

tardigrade81 wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 06:28

Hats off to Anaheim. I knew this would be a tough series. I said at the beginning I think it will go to game six. They are just playing like a very young and energetic team. Oilers are playing like they are lazy and want to go home. We are scoring enough, but the careless mistakes and horrible defense. It’s pathetic to watch. Jarry had a great game, and we still couldn’t win.

You are giving the ducks way too much credit I think. I don't think they're lazy buy this version of the oilers isn't remotely comparable to last years. They are decimated by injuries and horrific management decisions. The ducks are going to get rolled in the next round.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851980 is a reply to message #851979 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 07:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NCREDiBLE  is currently offline NCREDiBLE
Messages: 270
Registered: February 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB

No Cups

No discipline, no cup


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851981 is a reply to message #851980 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 07:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 1304
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

NCREDiBLE wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 07:37

No discipline, no cup

Discipline means nothing. It only matters if the beer leaguers decide to give you a penalty. The panthers are the least "disciplined" team in the league. Tampa isn't disciplined. Vegas wasn't disciplined when they won. If you play undisciplined every shift you'll get the same number of penalties as if you played nice clean disciplined game. So there is no benefit to doing that.

Guessing we've seen the last of Lloyd Braun.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851983 is a reply to message #851979 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 09:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 4474
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

4 Cups

Jay wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 14:32

tardigrade81 wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 06:28

Hats off to Anaheim. I knew this would be a tough series. I said at the beginning I think it will go to game six. They are just playing like a very young and energetic team. Oilers are playing like they are lazy and want to go home. We are scoring enough, but the careless mistakes and horrible defense. It’s pathetic to watch. Jarry had a great game, and we still couldn’t win.

You are giving the ducks way too much credit I think. I don't think they're lazy buy this version of the oilers isn't remotely comparable to last years. They are decimated by injuries and horrific management decisions. The ducks are going to get rolled in the next round.

Oh I agree completely. I think ducks are a solid team, but they won’t beat Vegas or especially Colorado, Dallas , Minnesota. Zero chance. But they are sure making Edmonton look silly. Never did I think in a game where our goalie has 30 plus saves and plays great that we would still lose. That’s always been our kryptonite is goaltending. Jarry played amazing; an we still lose.

Also, Nurse needs to go. I just can’t stand him what so ever

Edit. I should throw Mammoth in there too. I forgot they are actually up in their series against Vegas.

[Updated on: Mon, 27 April 2026 09:25]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851982 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 07:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smyth260  is currently offline smyth260
Messages: 1250
Registered: November 2007

1 Cup

Quite angry that on such an important goal, the refs have to have a conference to decide what the call on the ice is and call it a goal, despite not calling it that way when the 1 guy was looking at it behind the net. And despite what many have said, I’m not sure it did cross the line. The red paint is not a straight line, it fades into the white, and I don’t know what the rule is for exactly where the line is.

But the Oilers should not have let somebody else decide their fate. They have lost leads in every game, scored first in every game, and only come away with 1 win. Brutal defending.

Win the next one and task doesn’t look so big.



Clean house or bust

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851984 is a reply to message #851982 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 09:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 4474
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

4 Cups

smyth260 wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 14:49

Quite angry that on such an important goal, the refs have to have a conference to decide what the call on the ice is and call it a goal, despite not calling it that way when the 1 guy was looking at it behind the net. And despite what many have said, I’m not sure it did cross the line. The red paint is not a straight line, it fades into the white, and I don’t know what the rule is for exactly where the line is.

But the Oilers should not have let somebody else decide their fate. They have lost leads in every game, scored first in every game, and only come away with 1 win. Brutal defending.

Win the next one and task doesn’t look so big.

Came out and played an awesome first period, but this team just refuses to play a full 60 minutes. Scored two goals in the first 10 minutes. And then one goal in the last 50 minutes. It’s just typical oilers




Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851989 is a reply to message #851982 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 12:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 1304
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

smyth260 wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 07:49

And despite what many have said, I’m not sure it did cross the line. The red paint is not a straight line, it fades into the white, and I don’t know what the rule is for exactly where the line is.


It's weird how many people are repeating this idea that they got the call right so who cares how they got there.

First of all how they got there is a huge problem. I'd bet my house that the beer leaguers went into their huddle and got told through their ear piece to call it a goal so the burden of proof would need to show that it wasn't in. There is simply no other explanation that makes sense. They didn't see it and made no indication that they thought it was a goal until they got the instruction.

Second of all it is far from clear that it was in. You can see the white dot in the middle of the puck. It takes two seconds to take that radius and apply it towards the goal line. Of course camera angles and tilt of the puck can impact it but it's nowhere close to being conclusive and anyone saying it is are lying.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851992 is a reply to message #851989 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 13:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1995
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Jay wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 15:06

You can see the white dot in the middle of the puck. It takes two seconds to take that radius and apply it towards the goal line. Of course camera angles and tilt of the puck can impact it but it's nowhere close to being conclusive and anyone saying it is are lying.


Yeah, I’m not so sure anymore. Saw more pictures today, and it MIGHT NOT have been completely over.

I was annoyed last night that they callled it a goal on the ice for all the reasons mentioned. But “knowing” it was over made it easier to swallow. But now I’m pissed - there is absolutely no defensible stance they can take to justify calling that a goal on the ice.

Call on the ice should have been no goal. And were that the case, no chance they overturn that.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851993 is a reply to message #851992 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 14:20 Go to previous message
Steve is currently online Steve
Messages: 128
Registered: October 2006
Location: Ottawa

No Cups

My guess is that the refs were thinking about the player's reaction behind the net (whoever it was). "He had the best view, so let's agree with him and let video make the final call." They assumed the video would provide the evidence. They were wrong. They messed up, pure and simple. I don't think they were being malicious. Just making a human mistake at the wrong time.

There is no reason to not have tracking technology figure this out. A human can overturn it if there is an obvious mistake, but the tech will be right on the initial call way more often than a human. The same can go for offsides and icings. Reduce the number of people on the ice to open up more space.




"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."

- Calvin

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851985 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 09:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 12816
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Such a bummer season.

Still think 2023 was THE year. If Holland had the sack to LTIR Yams and Kane to add at the deadline, we could have taken in that season. Could have added a D and goalie.

And us winning with LTIR scamming in 2023 may have closed the loophole for 2024 and 2025 which would have crippled what Florida and Vegas were able to do, which could have gave us a great chance to win those seasons too.

Consequences of garbage lazy GMing. We've been experiencing it for multiple decades now.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851986 is a reply to message #851985 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 09:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 4474
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

4 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 16:47

Such a bummer season.

Still think 2023 was THE year. If Holland had the sack to LTIR Yams and Kane to add at the deadline, we could have taken in that season. Could have added a D and goalie.

And us winning with LTIR scamming in 2023 may have closed the loophole for 2024 and 2025 which would have crippled what Florida and Vegas were able to do, which could have gave us a great chance to win those seasons too.

Consequences of garbage lazy GMing. We've been experiencing it for multiple decades now.

Agreed. Just seems like the window is closing. McDavid I have a feeling will eventually leave and we will be garbage OR mediocre.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851987 is a reply to message #851951 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 11:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rocksteady  is currently offline Rocksteady
Messages: 641
Registered: March 2007

No Cups

It was a goal in my opinion, however the one ref looking down could not see it as a goal and when the refs got together they said the call on the ice stands. Uhh.. it's stands? where was the indicator form the ref that it was a goal? The ref had a pow-wow and then called a goal on the ice.

That said, it was inconclusive that the puck crossed the line, although that 25% we could see you can make a fair assumption it crossed the line.

Whatever, game over. Robbed win? Ehh maybe?

This season wasn't a good one and those that say the window is closing, I would have to say that is correct, our wondertwins are turning 30, getting hurt more because they play in everything, the whole league knows that the entire play of the team flows through them and choke them out the Oilers have nothing in terms of secondary scoring. (Although Kapenan and Dickenson are a huge surprise.)

This season has been an abject failure and I lay that on Bowman and Knoblauch. Coffey got here too late to change the D and shame on Knobs for not recognizing our defence was in poor shape.

Nurse has been here for all of it. Been a stalwart figure in the dressing room and besides that one year before his large contract, he hasn't moved the needle in our D. Trade him, (provided he moves his NMC) take on some of his salary and move on.

Blech.. let's get Tuesday over with and let McDavid and Draisaitl heal up. Hopefully there is a coach and GM out there who knows how to bring in the personnel and roll 4 lines, keep the wondertwins apart except on the powerplay.



The very definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing expecting different results.

Generally Disappointed.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4) [message #851990 is a reply to message #851987 ]
Mon, 27 April 2026 13:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 4474
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

4 Cups

Rocksteady wrote on Mon, 27 April 2026 18:00

It was a goal in my opinion, however the one ref looking down could not see it as a goal and when the refs got together they said the call on the ice stands. Uhh.. it's stands? where was the indicator form the ref that it was a goal? The ref had a pow-wow and then called a goal on the ice.

That said, it was inconclusive that the puck crossed the line, although that 25% we could see you can make a fair assumption it crossed the line.

Whatever, game over. Robbed win? Ehh maybe?

This season wasn't a good one and those that say the window is closing, I would have to say that is correct, our wondertwins are turning 30, getting hurt more because they play in everything, the whole league knows that the entire play of the team flows through them and choke them out the Oilers have nothing in terms of secondary scoring. (Although Kapenan and Dickenson are a huge surprise.)

This season has been an abject failure and I lay that on Bowman and Knoblauch. Coffey got here too late to change the D and shame on Knobs for not recognizing our defence was in poor shape.

Nurse has been here for all of it. Been a stalwart figure in the dressing room and besides that one year before his large contract, he hasn't moved the needle in our D. Trade him, (provided he moves his NMC) take on some of his salary and move on.

Blech.. let's get Tuesday over with and let McDavid and Draisaitl heal up. Hopefully there is a coach and GM out there who knows how to bring in the personnel and roll 4 lines, keep the wondertwins apart except on the powerplay.


Well said. Agree



Send a private message to this user  

 
Next Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Anaheim (Game #4)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca