This day on January 13
Acquired: Zdeno Ciger (1993) Kevin Todd (1993)
Departed: Bernie Nicholls (1993)

Happy Birthday To: Nikolai Khabibulin, HOZ., oiltrain, chase

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46)
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849497]
Mon, 12 January 2026 21:00 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

4
1
Final

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
Congratulations to: Leia for predicting the score.
 
Edmonton to win: 100%
Chicago to win: 0%
10 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849498 is a reply to message #849497 ]
Mon, 12 January 2026 21:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 12351
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Knight and us being a bit anti-clutch kept it close all night. Needed Ingram to be good in this one, and he was. 6/7 starts for Ingram >0.900. 1 game vs Boston ruined his stats, but back above 0.900 overall again now.


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849500 is a reply to message #849497 ]
Mon, 12 January 2026 22:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 5681
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

5 Cups

Great game by Ingram.. the defense must be underpaid because it was looking like they all had second jobs working as Dominos delivery guys..

Oilers owe him a shutout.

Luckily the Hawks couldn't bury any of their many chances..

I don't see Rozlovic as a center.. we need a 3C.. get Roz back on the wing.. Kapanen looks good on LD's wing.. lots of speed..



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849502 is a reply to message #849500 ]
Tue, 13 January 2026 05:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 3860
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

3 Cups

Ingram was damn good.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849503 is a reply to message #849502 ]
Tue, 13 January 2026 05:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NZ Oiler Fan  is currently offline NZ Oiler Fan
Messages: 1512
Registered: October 2006
Location: Summerside, PEI

1 Cup

Good win. Sounds like Ingram played fantastic. I heard on the radio that Jarry is very close to being ready to go. What do we do with our goalie situation then?

Ingram has been far better than Pickard, but he can be sent down without having to clear waivers. I think I'd still take the risk and send Pickard down though. If he gets claimed then he gets claimed. I like a Jarry - Ingram goalie tandem.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849504 is a reply to message #849503 ]
Tue, 13 January 2026 08:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
oilfan94  is currently offline oilfan94
Messages: 527
Registered: June 2006
Location: USA

No Cups

NZ Oiler Fan wrote on Tue, 13 January 2026 07:47

Good win. Sounds like Ingram played fantastic. I heard on the radio that Jarry is very close to being ready to go. What do we do with our goalie situation then?

Ingram has been far better than Pickard, but he can be sent down without having to clear waivers. I think I'd still take the risk and send Pickard down though. If he gets claimed then he gets claimed. I like a Jarry - Ingram goalie tandem.


I would much rather take my chances at losing Pickard vs sending Ingram down after being our best goalie all season. I get that you have to make good business decisions, but the best decision is to play your best players, otherwise I think it hurts the morale of the players (not that I think the management teams takes that much into account...).



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849506 is a reply to message #849503 ]
Tue, 13 January 2026 11:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7662
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

NZ Oiler Fan wrote on Tue, 13 January 2026 05:47

Good win. Sounds like Ingram played fantastic. I heard on the radio that Jarry is very close to being ready to go. What do we do with our goalie situation then?

Ingram has been far better than Pickard, but he can be sent down without having to clear waivers. I think I'd still take the risk and send Pickard down though. If he gets claimed then he gets claimed. I like a Jarry - Ingram goalie tandem.


Jason Gregor was talking about this too and trying to suggest that the team should demote Ingram just in case they lose Pickard. Pickard looks done though. His last two starts, he's allowed 3 first period goals. He's been terrible almost the entire season. Having a couple good games in December doesn't redeem him for me, and if we have two better options, then we should keep the better options up. If we lose him to waivers, that's probably a good thing as it means Connor Ungar still has a place to play in the AHL and bonus, the team saves a little money (sadly not cap space).

It should be interesting to see what they do, because it's an indication of how serious the Oilers are about being a winning team.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849507 is a reply to message #849506 ]
Tue, 13 January 2026 11:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 12351
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Adam wrote on Tue, 13 January 2026 11:09

NZ Oiler Fan wrote on Tue, 13 January 2026 05:47

Good win. Sounds like Ingram played fantastic. I heard on the radio that Jarry is very close to being ready to go. What do we do with our goalie situation then?

Ingram has been far better than Pickard, but he can be sent down without having to clear waivers. I think I'd still take the risk and send Pickard down though. If he gets claimed then he gets claimed. I like a Jarry - Ingram goalie tandem.


Jason Gregor was talking about this too and trying to suggest that the team should demote Ingram just in case they lose Pickard. Pickard looks done though. His last two starts, he's allowed 3 first period goals. He's been terrible almost the entire season. Having a couple good games in December doesn't redeem him for me, and if we have two better options, then we should keep the better options up. If we lose him to waivers, that's probably a good thing as it means Connor Ungar still has a place to play in the AHL and bonus, the team saves a little money (sadly not cap space).

It should be interesting to see what they do, because it's an indication of how serious the Oilers are about being a winning team.


Ingram actually has NHL level talent when he is on. That would be pure comedy if after he put up 6/7 >0.900 games we demoted him for Pickard.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849508 is a reply to message #849507 ]
Tue, 13 January 2026 11:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7662
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 13 January 2026 11:24

Adam wrote on Tue, 13 January 2026 11:09

NZ Oiler Fan wrote on Tue, 13 January 2026 05:47

Good win. Sounds like Ingram played fantastic. I heard on the radio that Jarry is very close to being ready to go. What do we do with our goalie situation then?

Ingram has been far better than Pickard, but he can be sent down without having to clear waivers. I think I'd still take the risk and send Pickard down though. If he gets claimed then he gets claimed. I like a Jarry - Ingram goalie tandem.


Jason Gregor was talking about this too and trying to suggest that the team should demote Ingram just in case they lose Pickard. Pickard looks done though. His last two starts, he's allowed 3 first period goals. He's been terrible almost the entire season. Having a couple good games in December doesn't redeem him for me, and if we have two better options, then we should keep the better options up. If we lose him to waivers, that's probably a good thing as it means Connor Ungar still has a place to play in the AHL and bonus, the team saves a little money (sadly not cap space).

It should be interesting to see what they do, because it's an indication of how serious the Oilers are about being a winning team.


Ingram actually has NHL level talent when he is on. That would be pure comedy if after he put up 6/7 >0.900 games we demoted him for Pickard.


It doesn't exactly send the message that performance matters...



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #46) [message #849510 is a reply to message #849508 ]
Tue, 13 January 2026 11:56 Go to previous message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2530
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Ingram brings calmness to the game. He looks composed and is always facing the right direction in net. I am so used to Pickard and Skinner getting turned around or falling on their faces I am somewhat confused by Ingram's style.


Send a private message to this user  

 
Next Topic:Pregame: Edmonton @ Nashville (Game #47)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca