This day on April 6
None

Happy Birthday To: rabi_sultan, TrueEdmontonOilerFan, Steve, Copper N Blue Crue, Mia00691

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76)
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842304]
Sat, 05 April 2025 16:30 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1722
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

0
3
Final

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win: 67%
Los Angeles to win: 33%
12 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842306 is a reply to message #842304 ]
Sat, 05 April 2025 16:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2873
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

We need our stars back badly


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842307 is a reply to message #842304 ]
Sat, 05 April 2025 16:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 11257
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Rough night for Walman. Keep trying to block out that the Blues got an actual top pair D for a 2nd and prospect in Fowler. Oh well


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842308 is a reply to message #842307 ]
Sat, 05 April 2025 17:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 710
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 05 April 2025 16:39

Rough night for Walman. Keep trying to block out that the Blues got an actual top pair D for a 2nd and prospect in Fowler. Oh well

Yeah but at least they didn't "get cute with it"! They just offered up that first and the sharks took it - what a shrewd move!

Also the blues got a 23 year old top 4 (minimum) for a 2nd. The oilers got flexibility to sign john klingberg and give up a 1st for Wallman.

Starting to think daryl Katz's oilers didn't and don't deserve the good fortune of 29 and 97. Look at what they've built around those 2..lol it's pretty amazing really. Nice 50/50 documentaries though.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842314 is a reply to message #842307 ]
Sun, 06 April 2025 14:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2406
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Sat, 05 April 2025 16:39

Rough night for Walman. Keep trying to block out that the Blues got an actual top pair D for a 2nd and prospect in Fowler. Oh well



Overall, I have liked Walman and I’ve never been a Fowler fan. Are we just piling on because we are completely decimated by injuries right now and need to project on to someone?

Plus Fowler came a bigger cap hit and is older. I couldn’t imagine the outrage if we made that deal.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842309 is a reply to message #842304 ]
Sat, 05 April 2025 17:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 3017
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

3 Cups

Really impressive game from the Oilers. Didn’t really give an inch and shut things down really well. Just need the big boys for some offence.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842310 is a reply to message #842304 ]
Sat, 05 April 2025 18:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4705
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Obvious to me why the Kings have such a great home win record.. that officiating was total Home-Town .. ref compensation currently undocumented.. that call on Bouchard against Foogle was a total fraud by the ref.. should get fired for that one.. Bouchard turns away from Foegle on the shoot in.. Foegle grabs Bouchard's arm and drags him down from behind.. and Bouchard gets the penalty.. Its almost like the Refs must be required to fulfill an LA home game power play quota ...

[Updated on: Sat, 05 April 2025 18:23]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842311 is a reply to message #842310 ]
Sat, 05 April 2025 18:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 11257
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Sat, 05 April 2025 18:21

Obvious to me why the Kings have such a great home win record.. that officiating was total Home-Town .. ref compensation currently undocumented.. that call on Bouchard against Foogle was a total fraud by the ref.. should get fired for that one.. Bouchard turns away from Foegle on the shoot in.. Foegle grabs Bouchard's arm and drags him down from behind.. and Bouchard gets the penalty.. Its almost like the Refs must be required to fulfill an LA home game power play quota ...


The LA players were having a good laugh on the bench after they ended up with a PP on that play.

[Updated on: Sat, 05 April 2025 21:22]


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842312 is a reply to message #842311 ]
Sat, 05 April 2025 21:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jay  is currently offline Jay
Messages: 710
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

Is it time to start asking why these players are being allowed to play when they obviously aren't ready? That's Elkholm, Draisaitl and now it looks like Frederik that have come back too early.
You could argue Skinner too if you counted the concussion spotter game.



"Initiative comes to thems that wait"

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842313 is a reply to message #842312 ]
Sun, 06 April 2025 08:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tardigrade81  is currently offline tardigrade81
Messages: 2873
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

2 Cups

Jay wrote on Sun, 06 April 2025 04:16

Is it time to start asking why these players are being allowed to play when they obviously aren't ready? That's Elkholm, Draisaitl and now it looks like Frederik that have come back too early.
You could argue Skinner too if you counted the concussion spotter game.

Well said. It's frustrating



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76) [message #842315 is a reply to message #842312 ]
Sun, 06 April 2025 15:09 Go to previous message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2406
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

Jay wrote on Sat, 05 April 2025 21:16

Is it time to start asking why these players are being allowed to play when they obviously aren't ready? That's Elkholm, Draisaitl and now it looks like Frederik that have come back too early.
You could argue Skinner too if you counted the concussion spotter game.


I don’t think you can argue the Skinner return.return. The knee to the head probably messed up his neck more than a concussion. Draisaitl return looked good until what, 2 separate mishaps that may be completely unrelated. The stepping in the puck looked to be the worst. My groin cried for him. Frederic looks like he’s battling an ankle sprain and that’s just pain tolerance now.

Ekholm? I dunno. McDavid too. No idea.

Maybe I’m just being an apologist?



Send a private message to this user  

 
Next Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #76)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca