| Review:
Utah @ Edmonton (Game #68) [message #841848] |
Tue, 18 March 2025 21:30  |
|
|
|
 |
 tardigrade81
Messages: 4518
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
4 Cups
|
|
Now this is oilers hockey
|
|
|
|
|
 |
watchman
Messages: 1861
Registered: October 2019
Location: River City
1 Cup
|
|
| tardigrade81 wrote on Tue, 18 March 2025 21:31 |
Now this is oilers hockey
|
...about time. Pickard was solid. Too bad about Leon. For a guy who has carried this team on his back I don't think having Perry on one wing was any help.
...this time, it's for real (isn't it?).
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Suomalainen
Messages: 1076
Registered: May 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
1 Cup
|
|
We're the only house in our neighbourhood with power after a blizzard rolled through this evening. Great night to stay in and watch this game the old fashioned way.
97.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Skookum Jim
Messages: 6200
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
6 Cups
|
|
PK looked good with the Ekholm-Walman and Nurse-Kulak pairings..
Nuge plays better as a center.. has way more positive effect on the game .. winger doesn't suit his best skills.
McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!! (Thank you Lord!)
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
|
|
|
|
|
|
tardigrade81
Messages: 4518
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
4 Cups
|
|
I swear we need to start pickard going forward
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Jay
Messages: 1352
Registered: January 2007
Location: Edmonton
1 Cup
|
|
| tardigrade81 wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 06:25 |
I swear we need to start pickard going forward
|
Don't you know Skinner got them to game 7 of the scf?
"Initiative comes to thems that wait"
|
|
|
|
|
|
tardigrade81
Messages: 4518
Registered: November 2022
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
4 Cups
|
|
| Jay wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 15:05 |
| tardigrade81 wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 06:25 |
I swear we need to start pickard going forward
|
Don't you know Skinner got them to game 7 of the scf?
|
Lmao
So I have heard
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Kr55
Messages: 12930
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton
6 Cups
|
|
| tardigrade81 wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 06:25 |
I swear we need to start pickard going forward
|
Play Skinner after every Pickard win is the play. Skinner is a different player after he had to watch Pickard trying to take his job. 10-2 and 0.925 sav% in the 12 instances.
"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013
"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015
5 x $5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Adam
Messages: 7775
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
6 Cups
|
|
| Kr55 wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 13:42 |
| tardigrade81 wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 06:25 |
I swear we need to start pickard going forward
|
Play Skinner after every Pickard win is the play. Skinner is a different player after he had to watch Pickard trying to take his job. 10-2 and 0.925 sav% in the 12 instances.
|
Also back-to-back Pickard hasn't gone well at all...
"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kr55
Messages: 12930
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton
6 Cups
|
|
| Adam wrote on Thu, 20 March 2025 11:12 |
| Kr55 wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 13:42 |
| tardigrade81 wrote on Wed, 19 March 2025 06:25 |
I swear we need to start pickard going forward
|
Play Skinner after every Pickard win is the play. Skinner is a different player after he had to watch Pickard trying to take his job. 10-2 and 0.925 sav% in the 12 instances.
|
Also back-to-back Pickard hasn't gone well at all...
|
Yeah, that's unfortunately why we can never do 1A/1B with these guys. Pickard falters every time the coach considers playing him for a run.
If Skinner really does need the motivation of the other guy pushing for his spot, we really do need a better other guy. If we insist on keeping Skinner indefinitely, we still probably need our 1A of the 1A/1B.
"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013
"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015
5 x $5,000,000
|
|
|
|
