 |
 CrusaderPi
Messages: 8140
Registered: December 2003
Location: Downtown Edmonton
6 Cups
|
|
| RDOilerfan wrote on Tue, 10 January 2023 11:21 |
| Mike wrote on Tue, 10 January 2023 10:46 |
| RDOilerfan wrote on Tue, 10 January 2023 13:09 |
What's been the reoccurring theme for YEARS?!
|
Management? Players have been churned for almost 2 decades with the same results. It starts at the top.
|
Don't think I don't place blame on management, I do but at the end of the day, it's up to the players to perform. I am not here to defend Holland, he has blame but do you think he doesn't want the team to play better defense from McD down? I bet he does. So you swap out Holland for whoever you deem as a good GM and all of a sudden it clicks in that the team has to play defense when it hasn't before?
|
Management builds the team. It's hard for me to look at this team and expect them to be performing much differently than they are now. Expecting individuals to magically perform well above their capabilities is setting yourself up for disappointment. So while you might not be here to defend Holland, that's what you're doing. This is his team and his team is badly flawed.
So if we swap out Holland, nothing changes. This team is this team. He built it and it's not very good. At least, not good enough to be a legitimate contender. The defense was BAD last year. Bottom half of the league in the regular season and porous in the playoffs. His solution was to hope rookies would fix the problems. That is on Holland. Expecting players who weren't good enough last year to somehow be good enough this year is foolish.
In before "we need Keith". The defense was bad last year with Keith, but even if it wasn't Holland saw him walk out the door and did nothing to fix the veteran leadership hole. That again is on Holland.
tl;dr: The problem isn't grit, caring, effort, work, fighting, or body language. The team isn't good enough to do what they're being asked to do. Holland is not a good GM. His team isn't good enough because of his decision.
Super tl;dr: Holland needs to go.
Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.
|
|
|
|
Review:
Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: OilFans on Mon, 09 January 2023 23:00 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Kr55 on Mon, 09 January 2023 23:19 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: g2k on Mon, 09 January 2023 23:22 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: watchman on Mon, 09 January 2023 23:31 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Leia on Mon, 09 January 2023 23:36 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: K.McC#24 on Tue, 10 January 2023 00:11 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Mike on Tue, 10 January 2023 07:29 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Adam on Tue, 10 January 2023 09:49 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Mike on Tue, 10 January 2023 10:46 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: nullterm on Tue, 10 January 2023 11:00 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 10 January 2023 13:02 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Kr55 on Tue, 10 January 2023 13:49 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: smyth260 on Tue, 10 January 2023 15:36 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: g2k on Tue, 10 January 2023 15:18 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Adam on Tue, 10 January 2023 16:13 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Adam on Tue, 10 January 2023 18:24 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: PlusOne on Wed, 11 January 2023 11:55 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Adam on Wed, 11 January 2023 16:08 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: Adam on Thu, 12 January 2023 12:18 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #42) |
By: g2k on Wed, 11 January 2023 21:33 |
