This day on November 25
None

Happy Birthday To: Bert, romanoksuita, SixCupComing, BobBeers, Jodes

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5)Pages (4): [1  2  3  4  >  »]
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807578]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:00 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1561
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

5
4
Final (OT)

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win: 0%
Calgary to win: 0%
0 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807625 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/MA_Route_8.svg/600px-MA_Route_8.svg.png


#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807627 is a reply to message #807625 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ragnarok73  is currently offline Ragnarok73
Messages: 2419
Registered: February 2011

2 Cups

CONNOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!


"There's no greater springboard to development than failure." - Craig MacTavish, April 13/15.

5-14-6-1

"Sabres think the suck is their ally? They merely adopted the suck. The Oilers were born in it...molded by it."

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807630 is a reply to message #807625 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Does… this mean the Oilers get to hang a pacific division banner?


Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807633 is a reply to message #807630 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ragnarok73  is currently offline Ragnarok73
Messages: 2419
Registered: February 2011

2 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:41

Does… this mean the Oilers get to hang a pacific division banner?

Psh, don't make them sound like the Dys.

P.S.: Well, looks like it's time to nip over to the CP forum to witness the thermonuclear meltdown. I ought to wear a radiation suit for this one.



"There's no greater springboard to development than failure." - Craig MacTavish, April 13/15.

5-14-6-1

"Sabres think the suck is their ally? They merely adopted the suck. The Oilers were born in it...molded by it."

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807637 is a reply to message #807633 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Iamheretoday  is currently offline Iamheretoday
Messages: 65
Registered: August 2007

No Cups

Omg, bring on round 3 Wave Towel


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807628 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

McJesus rises for OT


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807634 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stemhovlichski  is currently offline stemhovlichski
Messages: 349
Registered: March 2006
Location: NSR

No Cups

Where's my pants????

Wave Towel



Restored: "We're sucking hind banana here." - Pat Quinn, Jan 18, 2010

"...the Oilers have been rebuilding for so long that it’s hard not to be cynical." - NBC's Ryan Dadoun Jan 2, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807643 is a reply to message #807634 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Leia  is currently offline Leia
Messages: 410
Registered: May 2003
Location: England

No Cups

Can't say I've got a crystal ball, but I predicted us to win in 5... My goodness this is so freaking sweet. OT winner from McDavid who played his worse game of the play-off's as well.

5.30 in the morning and I don't care if I woke anyone up with that scream on the goal...



Take me home, country road
to the place where I belong
to Alberta, to see the Oilers
take me home, country road

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807636 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Drai with a casual 4 points. Just destroys the 3 straight 3+ points record with his 5th in a row.


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807642 is a reply to message #807636 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:45

Drai with a casual 4 points. Just destroys the 3 straight 3+ points record with his 5th in a row.

This might be beneficial rest for his ankle.

5 games!



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807644 is a reply to message #807636 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HamBlaster  is currently offline HamBlaster
Messages: 989
Registered: June 2007

No Cups

No kidding, hey?

Warlord Drai has arrived in the 2022 playoffs.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807645 is a reply to message #807644 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ragnarok73  is currently offline Ragnarok73
Messages: 2419
Registered: February 2011

2 Cups

HamBlaster wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:47

No kidding, hey?

Warlord Drai has arrived in the 2022 playoffs.


What is best in life, Leon?

https://media.giphy.com/media/dYgDRfc61SGtO/giphy.gif



"There's no greater springboard to development than failure." - Craig MacTavish, April 13/15.

5-14-6-1

"Sabres think the suck is their ally? They merely adopted the suck. The Oilers were born in it...molded by it."

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807638 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Connor.

“I was bad all night”. Said it 2x.

He’s a champion.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807641 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HamBlaster  is currently offline HamBlaster
Messages: 989
Registered: June 2007

No Cups

LFGGGGGGG!!!


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807646 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.




"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807647 is a reply to message #807646 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

It’s typical Flames stuff. Complain about no review in ‘04. Complain about a review in ‘22. Whatever. The puck wasn’t in and it never will be in. Either year.


Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807648 is a reply to message #807647 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 22:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:55

It’s typical Flames stuff. Complain about no review in ‘04. Complain about a review in ‘22. Whatever. The puck wasn’t in and it never will be in. Either year.


Lol. I get the Lames fans holding on but all media guys still seem flabbergasted by the call



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807649 is a reply to message #807647 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
oilfan94  is currently offline oilfan94
Messages: 410
Registered: June 2006
Location: USA

No Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Fri, 27 May 2022 00:55

It’s typical Flames stuff. Complain about no review in ‘04. Complain about a review in ‘22. Whatever. The puck wasn’t in and it never will be in. Either year.


Yeah, my buddy whose a Flames fan is making a lot of comments about the refs I feel like he's going to regret someday. He might have mentioned 04 two or three, maybe nine times in the last 30 minutes. Absolutely a kick, and an unnecessary one at that, the puck was going in.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807652 is a reply to message #807649 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

oilfan94 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:01

CrusaderPi wrote on Fri, 27 May 2022 00:55

It’s typical Flames stuff. Complain about no review in ‘04. Complain about a review in ‘22. Whatever. The puck wasn’t in and it never will be in. Either year.


Yeah, my buddy whose a Flames fan is making a lot of comments about the refs I feel like he's going to regret someday. He might have mentioned 04 two or three, maybe nine times in the last 30 minutes. Absolutely a kick, and an unnecessary one at that, the puck was going in.


All he had to do was lift up and go around the post. The idea he is just trying to stop by tilting his body over and extending his left leg underneath his right one is hilarious.

Oh well.

So glad we finished this tonight. Clearly some guys on this team need rest, bad. Smith maybe more than Drai. I was really getting scared what Game 6 or 7 Smith would play like.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807656 is a reply to message #807646 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.



They can redirect. I think they've got an argument, if it was us I'd be out in the street with a molotov cocktail in hand and a baseball bat in the other. He probably should have left it alone and it would have gone in anyway.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807657 is a reply to message #807656 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

K.McC#24 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:23

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.



They can redirect. I think they've got an argument, if it was us I'd be out in the street with a molotov cocktail in hand and a baseball bat in the other. He probably should have left it alone and it would have gone in anyway.


Was it a redirect? That was him pushing his skate into the puck.

The redirect can be allowed, but that just means you turn your foot or keep it stationary. Moving your skate into the puck to push it is always a kick. One of the easier calls to get right IMO.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807659 is a reply to message #807657 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7804
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Even if it’s a bad call, who cares? You’re still tied. Play the game and win. Blaming a call, especially in a tie game, is a loser mentality. The upside for Calgary is it’s a very nice distraction from the 25 goals they gave up and leads they choked away in games 1, 2, and 5. Remember when they tied game 4 up and gave up a goal three seconds later? Me neither. Focus on the call.


Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807660 is a reply to message #807657 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
oilfan94  is currently offline oilfan94
Messages: 410
Registered: June 2006
Location: USA

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 27 May 2022 01:24

K.McC#24 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:23

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.



They can redirect. I think they've got an argument, if it was us I'd be out in the street with a molotov cocktail in hand and a baseball bat in the other. He probably should have left it alone and it would have gone in anyway.


Was it a redirect? That was him pushing his skate into the puck.

The redirect can be allowed, but that just means you turn your foot or keep it stationary. Moving your skate into the puck to push it is always a kick. One of the easier calls to get right IMO.


You can definitely see him extend his foot to the puck in the reply, and that is probably what did it. Maybe he didn't mean to, but that is what the ref sees, and even if the puck is headed in not it becomes one that is kicked it. They should be mad at Coleman more than the refs, but Flames fans have flashbacks to 2004, so I think its bubbling up 18 years of anger now.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807674 is a reply to message #807660 ]
Fri, 27 May 2022 01:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 7177
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

oilfan94 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:33

Kr55 wrote on Fri, 27 May 2022 01:24

K.McC#24 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:23

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.



They can redirect. I think they've got an argument, if it was us I'd be out in the street with a molotov cocktail in hand and a baseball bat in the other. He probably should have left it alone and it would have gone in anyway.


Was it a redirect? That was him pushing his skate into the puck.

The redirect can be allowed, but that just means you turn your foot or keep it stationary. Moving your skate into the puck to push it is always a kick. One of the easier calls to get right IMO.


You can definitely see him extend his foot to the puck in the reply, and that is probably what did it. Maybe he didn't mean to, but that is what the ref sees, and even if the puck is headed in not it becomes one that is kicked it. They should be mad at Coleman more than the refs, but Flames fans have flashbacks to 2004, so I think its bubbling up 18 years of anger now.


Not only does he extend his leg weirdly to make contact, but his eyes are locked on the puck the whole way too. He knew exactly what he was doing and he thought he'd get away with it. Stupid play, because he kicked it a centimeter in front of the goal line and no one else was within two feet of it. That was going in the net and he put it in the refs hands to make a judgement call because of his action. He cost his team the game with that move.

So long Calgary! This feels great, but we're still only half way there. Enjoy tonight, and then back to business! Two rounds isn't enough.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807661 is a reply to message #807657 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:24

K.McC#24 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:23

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.



They can redirect. I think they've got an argument, if it was us I'd be out in the street with a molotov cocktail in hand and a baseball bat in the other. He probably should have left it alone and it would have gone in anyway.


Was it a redirect? That was him pushing his skate into the puck.

The redirect can be allowed, but that just means you turn your foot or keep it stationary. Moving your skate into the puck to push it is always a kick. One of the easier calls to get right IMO.


If that had happened to us you and I would have been all over that, everyone would have. It was bigger because it was a big moment. It don't frickin matter now though!
Wave Towel



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807663 is a reply to message #807661 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

K.McC#24 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:33

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:24

K.McC#24 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:23

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.



They can redirect. I think they've got an argument, if it was us I'd be out in the street with a molotov cocktail in hand and a baseball bat in the other. He probably should have left it alone and it would have gone in anyway.


Was it a redirect? That was him pushing his skate into the puck.

The redirect can be allowed, but that just means you turn your foot or keep it stationary. Moving your skate into the puck to push it is always a kick. One of the easier calls to get right IMO.


If that had happened to us you and I would have been all over that, everyone would have. It was bigger because it was a big moment. It don't frickin matter now though!
Wave Towel


No way, I'm a totally unbiased person that looks at every play with a completely neutral viewpoint... icon_lol


Honestly though, I'd like to think I would accept that one. The sad part for him is all he had to do was leave it and it's in. That extension with the left leg was just pure instinct though, bummer for him. He was a little rat all series though, so kinda funny it was him too.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807672 is a reply to message #807663 ]
Fri, 27 May 2022 01:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stemhovlichski  is currently offline stemhovlichski
Messages: 349
Registered: March 2006
Location: NSR

No Cups

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:36



The sad part for him is all he had to do was leave it and it's in.


Ceci was going for the loose rolling puck and Coleman took him out of the play, so there's a decent chance that Ceci could (possibly) have swept the puck out of the crease before it went in. Ceci pushed back and tied Coleman up, so Coleman had to drain it with the kick.

The second it went in I texted my buddy it was kicked. But, based on prior experience, I figured it was going to be called a good goal no matter what.

Kind of poetic instant karma justice that Coleman, who was crashing the Oilers' crease every game, got burned crashing the Oilers' crease. icon_lol



Restored: "We're sucking hind banana here." - Pat Quinn, Jan 18, 2010

"...the Oilers have been rebuilding for so long that it’s hard not to be cynical." - NBC's Ryan Dadoun Jan 2, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807690 is a reply to message #807672 ]
Fri, 27 May 2022 07:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hibernia  is currently offline Hibernia
Messages: 102
Registered: October 1998
Location: Sin John's

No Cups

stemhovlichski wrote on Fri, 27 May 2022 04:33

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:36



The sad part for him is all he had to do was leave it and it's in.


Ceci was going for the loose rolling puck and Coleman took him out of the play, so there's a decent chance that Ceci could (possibly) have swept the puck out of the crease before it went in. Ceci pushed back and tied Coleman up, so Coleman had to drain it with the kick.

The second it went in I texted my buddy it was kicked. But, based on prior experience, I figured it was going to be called a good goal no matter what.

Kind of poetic instant karma justice that Coleman, who was crashing the Oilers' crease every game, got burned crashing the Oilers' crease. icon_lol



Right before they made the call, I tweeted that thought it was a kick, but there was no chance they would overturn it as it was too subtle. So happy to be wrong on that one.



What happened to all of my messages? lol (I guess it's been awhile) BlueSky: StefBarnes

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807665 is a reply to message #807657 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:24

Was it a redirect? That was him pushing his skate into the puck.

The redirect can be allowed, but that just means you turn your foot or keep it stationary. Moving your skate into the puck to push it is always a kick. One of the easier calls to get right IMO.


Agree 100%.. that was a soccer move you'd see in the Premier League.. he purposely crossed his left foot under his right leg (which was unnatural and probably tipped the decision) and pushed the foot into the puck in the direction of the net.. that's a kicking motion.. and regardless (as others have mentioned) game was still tied.. Flames had a fair chance to win after that.. until.. PING!

Besides.. after all the terrible decisions by NHL Control the Oilers have had to live with over the years in the playoffs (Kesler anyone?) .. I wouldn't be too broken up about this call.



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807692 is a reply to message #807665 ]
Fri, 27 May 2022 08:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:50

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:24

Was it a redirect? That was him pushing his skate into the puck.

The redirect can be allowed, but that just means you turn your foot or keep it stationary. Moving your skate into the puck to push it is always a kick. One of the easier calls to get right IMO.


Agree 100%.. that was a soccer move you'd see in the Premier League.. he purposely crossed his left foot under his right leg (which was unnatural and probably tipped the decision) and pushed the foot into the puck in the direction of the net.. that's a kicking motion.. and regardless (as others have mentioned) game was still tied.. Flames had a fair chance to win after that.. until.. PING!

Besides.. after all the terrible decisions by NHL Control the Oilers have had to live with over the years in the playoffs (Kesler anyone?) .. I wouldn't be too broken up about this call.


I saw the crossover on the opposite side high view when I dragged my ass out of bed a couple hours ago and that looks more like a kick out of all the angles. I would agree that might turn it over, don't remember seeing that last night.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807685 is a reply to message #807656 ]
Fri, 27 May 2022 06:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2343
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

K.McC#24 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 23:23

Kr55 wrote on Thu, 26 May 2022 22:53

How is anyone still questioning that was a kick? There was no reason for him to extend his left leg under the right one at the puck except to try to kick the puck.



They can redirect. I think they've got an argument, if it was us I'd be out in the street with a molotov cocktail in hand and a baseball bat in the other. He probably should have left it alone and it would have gone in anyway.


I feel the same, but I’d be twice as angry as the puck was going in regardless.

Oh well. Makes up +++ for the waved off goals earlier in the series.

[Updated on: Fri, 27 May 2022 06:29]


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807650 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skoobz  is currently offline Skoobz
Messages: 334
Registered: January 2006

No Cups

I honestly said I didn’t want the Flames at first, because I didn’t want to see a loss to them. But then, I realized that McDavid’s path to eternal glory had to go through Calgary at some point. And to do it this way? He’s building a temple.

Edit: and I can’t find it, but I think Drai just had the best PPG in a playoff series in history. And Hyman will retire an Oilers legend too. I’m speechless

[Updated on: Thu, 26 May 2022 23:11]


"[It was] really cool to throw on the Oilers gear, the gear that I want to play the rest of my life wearing. It was pretty cool to put it on. With all the history, it was a lot of fun." - Connor McDavid, July 1, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807651 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smyth260  is currently offline smyth260
Messages: 1081
Registered: November 2007

1 Cup

Play LA BAMBA BABY!!

I can’t believe I just saw my team steamroll through Calgary in a playoff series. Is this what pure happiness feels like?

Final 4!!



Clean house or bust

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807653 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2834
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

Yeah!!!

Jesus the broadcast team was subdued. Should have dubbed Jack and Stauffer over that garbage.

Happy, so happy to be back in the conference finals, the league semis, the final frigging 4!

McDavid figured he was bad? Huh. Maybe he was regular season McDavid.

Hyman helluva series, a big part of getting this group going tonight. LD was laboring sometimes, he's gutting out big time, but a hell of a game, 19 helpers in the playoffs. Thought Yamo and Nuge were really good on the boards, in the corners, being tenacious, defending, being good in their end. Love it. That 3rd line played a pretty mature game. JP a big goal and its gonna get him going, I'm a believer.

D had some moments but some redemption too. Nurse and Bouch adding to the tally.

Man, Markstrom was just that little bit worse than Mike Smith. The next series the Oilers need much, much better goaltending.

Controversial no goal against late, but these guys deserve this series racking off 4 straight wins against a team that was hyped to be built for the playoffs. I'm very happy about the resilience of this club, and where it's at in that respect, just finding ways to get out of holes, overcome momentum swings, and just get things done.

The really exciting part is that it it should be clear to the NHL and everyone that these guys deserve to be here. Get some rest, heal a bit. Anything is possible.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807654 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Woody may just like the microphone as much as MacTavish.

Good on him. He’s doing something right for sure.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807655 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 10779
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

https://i.ibb.co/fCVX7HS/ENG.jpg


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807658 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2022/05/27/USAT/9df41779-a7ec-4f75-b22e-98263eb016ee-USATSI_18365352.jpg?width=660&height=441&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807662 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 4421
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

4 Cups

Flames fans hopes and dreams for 2022..

https://c.tenor.com/1wuZAfHyKjYAAAAC/flush-toilet.gif

[Updated on: Thu, 26 May 2022 23:51]


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5) [message #807664 is a reply to message #807578 ]
Thu, 26 May 2022 23:38 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
oilfan94  is currently offline oilfan94
Messages: 410
Registered: June 2006
Location: USA

No Cups

Just an amazing feeling to get past Calgary. I didn't want this match up, especially after seeing the solid goaltending they got in round 1 and remember the 9-5 game during the season. Then after game 1 I felt like the Oilers used up all their comeback points in that game. Never been so glad to be so wrong. Lots of focus of McDavid and Draisaitl for their points (Draisaitl with 17 points in 5 games!), but so many players played at the top of their game through the series, it was a real treat to watch.


Send a private message to this user  

Pages (4): [1  2  3  4  >  »]  
Previous Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Colorado (Game #1)
Next Topic:Pregame: Edmonton @ Calgary (Game #5)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca