 |
 Adam
Messages: 7757
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
6 Cups
|
|
| Mike wrote on Fri, 08 April 2022 11:18 |
| Adam wrote on Fri, 08 April 2022 12:59 |
| Mike wrote on Fri, 08 April 2022 06:40 |
What a huge win! Refereeing was surprisingly not as bad as we've been treated to in other Kings games. Though there were 3-4 pretty hard hits to the numbers that went uncalled. And I was stunned to see them call that hold on Ryan with us leading and only 4 minutes to go.
3 up on the Kings with a game in hand, and 7 clear of Vegas. Jack mentioned we can start looking at Calgary now - as much as I hate the idea of hearing about the Flames winning the division, I have 0 desire to play Nashville/St Louis/Minnesota/Dallas in the first round. In our history, those are literally the 4 Western teams we have the worst record against. In the playoffs, there is no team I want to face less than the Stars. Still have PTSD from 1998-2003.
|
Isn't the record against Nashville, St. Louis and Minnesota all 0-0 in the playoffs? I can't remember a series against St. Louis in any of the glory years days, and I know we haven't played the other two ever.
Dallas is an interesting team. I'm not sure what to make of them. On paper they look like they should be better than their results.
I am worried about everyone in the playoffs, because our goaltending is still a major weakness, and the NHL is run by chimpanzees who think it's a positive that virtually no fouls get called in the post-season. Smith & Koskinen is far from an ideal tandem to pin our hopes to.
|
Yeah - I meant regular season obviously as the only one of those teams we played in the playoffs is Dallas. And like 60 times in a row.
And I know ancient history doesn't really matter, but the Wild have just always had our number. Our winning % against them is the lower than any other team: 38.5%. Dallas is next at 40.3% (2-6 in playoff series 2-6 if you count the North Stars). And this year, we are a combined 0-4 against them.
|
Yeah, the longer we can stay in the Smythe Pacific Division, the better. Everyone in the Central looks to be scarier opponents than the Kings, Flames or Knights this year. I wonder if Winnipeg isn't a playoff team if they didn't have to play their division most.
"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireBobbyNicks
|
|
|
|
Review:
Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: OilFans on Thu, 07 April 2022 23:00 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: JPro on Thu, 07 April 2022 23:02 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: smyth260 on Thu, 07 April 2022 23:04 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: g2k on Fri, 08 April 2022 00:09 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: Mike on Fri, 08 April 2022 06:40 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: Adam on Fri, 08 April 2022 09:59 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: nullterm on Fri, 08 April 2022 10:16 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: Mike on Fri, 08 April 2022 11:18 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: Adam on Fri, 08 April 2022 11:40 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
By: Adam on Fri, 08 April 2022 13:09 |
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
|
Re: Review: Edmonton @ Los Angeles (Game #72) |
|
