 |
 Skookum Jim
Messages: 3900
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
3 Cups
|
|
| Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 02 July 2019 09:28 |
| RDOilerfan wrote on Tue, 02 July 2019 10:25 |
| Rocksteady wrote on Tue, 02 July 2019 10:19 |
I still thought it was too much money for Chiasson. For a guy that had a career year and a track history of less than 20 goals per season you could of had him 1.5AAV for 2 instead of 2.15. However in the end it's fine when you're talking about a few hundred thousand quid.
*for the record I have no idea what a quid is, except that it's used in saying in the same vein as dollars. Not sure the denomination of quid either.. but I juxtaposed the relationship.
✔ Word of the day.
✔ Used a word not used used very much in North America.
✔ Everyone should be proud of me.
|
If you look at the market and how much money and term bottom 6 guys were getting, I thought the Chiasson contract was pretty decent.
|
A lot of people have said this to me. I'm probably in the minority but I remain steadfast saying he is paid too much. It's all just an opinion really, right or wrong. I hope Chiasson proves me wrong.
|
My biggest problem with Chiasson is his speed. Boots. Slow. He had a career year, expect 2nd year on the 2M x 2 will interfere with future moves/signings that we'll regret due to drop off in Chiasson's contributions... but.. cards still in play... we'll see whats what by training camp.
McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,
|
|
|
|
