This day on April 19
None

Happy Birthday To: jari17, trehorse, 5mowill, Dragon_Matt, smyth2007

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53)Pages (2): [1  2  >  »]
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729738]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:30 Go to next message
OilFans  is currently offline OilFans
Messages: 1420
Registered: February 2006
Location: Edmonton

1 Cup

6
2
Final

Score Prediction
Login To See Your Results
No one predicted this!
 
Edmonton to win:   0%
Chicago to win:   0%
0 entries          View all picks   Leaderboard



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729739 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

It’s fine. I don’t know why you’re all acting as though the sky is falling. We’re 3 points out of the playoffs.


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729744 is a reply to message #729739 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9535
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:31

It’s fine. I don’t know why you’re all acting as though the sky is falling. We’re 3 points out of the playoffs.


This league is broken. How is this possible that we're still 3 points out?? 2 games under bettman .500



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729750 is a reply to message #729744 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:37

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:31

It’s fine. I don’t know why you’re all acting as though the sky is falling. We’re 3 points out of the playoffs.


This league is broken. How is this possible that we're still 3 points out?? 2 games under bettman .500

It’s such a joke. But the argument will be ‘it keeps it entertaining for the fans seeing tighter playoff races’.

It’s not fine. My first post was tongue in cheek.

Imagine, these clowns play some third period hockey the last 3 games and were 1 point up on the WC group. Such a joke.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729753 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2614
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

Think Dougie Weight needs to call an all players meeting..


#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729757 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

... fire Hitch?

Like holy crap. What a joke of a team. It hurts me to say this about a team with the best player in the league... but holy smokes.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729758 is a reply to message #729757 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:44

... fire Hitch?

Like holy crap. What a joke of a team. It hurts me to say this about a team with the best player in the league... but holy smokes.

Relegation is the only answer.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729760 is a reply to message #729758 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Prince Albert 1  is currently offline Prince Albert 1
Messages: 33
Registered: February 2006
Location: Prince Albert,Sk

No Cups

Who do we like at #4,5 or 6 in the draft? Bowen Byram? Kirby Dach?


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729762 is a reply to message #729760 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Prince Albert 1 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:50

Who do we like at #4,5 or 6 in the draft? Bowen Byram? Kirby Dach?

Kirby! He and (other former Saskatoon Blade) Hebig will tear up the A. Hahaha



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729763 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
overdue  is currently offline overdue
Messages: 493
Registered: October 2014

No Cups

Todd Mclellan is probably feeling pretty vindicated right about now. I feel sorry for Hitch. I think he really believed he could make this mess work and start winning again. Putting Lucic on McDavids wing is a big mistake though on his part. It's like playing with a handicap. Our only real hope playing with a handicap! What can you say? This team is crap!


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729828 is a reply to message #729763 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 10:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rocksteady  is currently offline Rocksteady
Messages: 478
Registered: March 2007

No Cups

overdue wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:52

Todd Mclellan is probably feeling pretty vindicated right about now. I feel sorry for Hitch. I think he really believed he could make this mess work and start winning again. Putting Lucic on McDavids wing is a big mistake though on his part. It's like playing with a handicap. Our only real hope playing with a handicap! What can you say? This team is crap!


But Lucic is on the cusp of getting out of this funk!! The experts says so!




The very definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing expecting different results.

Generally Disappointed.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729765 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9535
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Did you know that MacT is the top dog in Hockey Ops below Nicholson. What a world man.


"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729769 is a reply to message #729765 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:55

Did you know that MacT is the top dog in Hockey Ops below Nicholson. What a world man.

No. No no no. Really?! Holy smokes. Hahahahaha.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729770 is a reply to message #729765 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:55

Did you know that MacT is the top dog in Hockey Ops below Nicholson. What a world man.

I have some concerns regarding what he actually knows about winning. Maybe we should get him a mentor.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729771 is a reply to message #729770 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:56

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:55

Did you know that MacT is the top dog in Hockey Ops below Nicholson. What a world man.

I have some concerns regarding what he actually knows about winning. Maybe we should get him a mentor.

Brady? Belichick?



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729774 is a reply to message #729771 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:58

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:56

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:55

Did you know that MacT is the top dog in Hockey Ops below Nicholson. What a world man.

I have some concerns regarding what he actually knows about winning. Maybe we should get him a mentor.

Brady? Belichick?

You joke but Eakins went to the Cowboys training camp for, uh, I’m not actually sure why. It worked though, he had a very successful second season in Edmonton.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729777 is a reply to message #729774 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 23:02

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:58

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:56

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:55

Did you know that MacT is the top dog in Hockey Ops below Nicholson. What a world man.

I have some concerns regarding what he actually knows about winning. Maybe we should get him a mentor.

Brady? Belichick?

You joke but Eakins went to the Cowboys training camp for, uh, I’m not actually sure why. It worked though, he had a very successful second season in Edmonton.

That’s right!! I forgot all about that. But I mean... what have the cowboys done? Also, is Jerry that much different than Katz?



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729781 is a reply to message #729774 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2614
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:02

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:58

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:56

Kr55 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:55

Did you know that MacT is the top dog in Hockey Ops below Nicholson. What a world man.

I have some concerns regarding what he actually knows about winning. Maybe we should get him a mentor.

Brady? Belichick?

You joke but Eakins went to the Cowboys training camp for, uh, I’m not actually sure why. It worked though, he had a very successful second season in Edmonton.

Back then I wondered how much of an ass Eakins made of himself that day.

I’m seeing visions of Trudeau in Indian garb.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729772 is a reply to message #729765 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ragnarok73  is currently offline Ragnarok73
Messages: 2343
Registered: February 2011

2 Cups

So, I think it’s time for the fire sale. Then, we can only hope that either Katz or his heir finally take the time for the long-needed pus draining needed to allow the wounds created by the OBC to start healing.


"There's no greater springboard to development than failure." - Craig MacTavish, April 13/15.

5-14-6-1

"Sabres think the suck is their ally? They merely adopted the suck. The Oilers were born in it...molded by it."

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729773 is a reply to message #729772 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Ragnarok73 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:58

So, I think it’s time for the fire sale. Then, we can only hope that either Katz or his heir finally take the time for the long-needed pus draining needed to allow the wounds created by the OBC to start healing.

I question the value of what the Oilers could sell. Like how many players do the Oilers have that could play on a playoff team? 5? 7?



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729775 is a reply to message #729773 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 23:00

Ragnarok73 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 21:58

So, I think it’s time for the fire sale. Then, we can only hope that either Katz or his heir finally take the time for the long-needed pus draining needed to allow the wounds created by the OBC to start healing.

I question the value of what the Oilers could sell. Like how many players do the Oilers have that could play on a playoff team? 5? 7?

Gotta be at least... yeah 7 sounds right. Maybe.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729803 is a reply to message #729773 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 02:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mightyreasoner  is currently offline mightyreasoner
Messages: 508
Registered: October 2005
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:00


I question the value of what the Oilers could sell. Like how many players do the Oilers have that could play on a playoff team? 5? 7?


Ooh, fun game.

1. McDavid
2. Draisaitl
3. Nugent-Hopkins
4. Klefbom
5. Larsson
6. Nurse

Russell? Kassian? Chiasson? Benning? Khaira? Do any of those guys make it?



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729808 is a reply to message #729803 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 07:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

mightyreasoner wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 03:45

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:00


I question the value of what the Oilers could sell. Like how many players do the Oilers have that could play on a playoff team? 5? 7?


Ooh, fun game.

1. McDavid
2. Draisaitl
3. Nugent-Hopkins
4. Klefbom
5. Larsson
6. Nurse

Russell? Kassian? Chiasson? Benning? Khaira? Do any of those guys make it?


I’d argue Lucic would be the 7th. Let’s face it. He’s built for playoff hockey.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729767 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 21:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Sportsnet usually has some of the postgame scrums... I’m hoping to catch Hitch’s comments.


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729779 is a reply to message #729767 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
twilson1111  is currently offline twilson1111
Messages: 106
Registered: October 2010
Location: Calgary

No Cups

If Talbot gave him an earful, I don’t blame hitch there... Talbot has not been good enough. Ok he had 2/3 of a good game today but hen totally collapsed.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729780 is a reply to message #729779 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9535
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

twilson1111 wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:10

If Talbot gave him an earful, I don’t blame hitch there... Talbot has not been good enough. Ok he had 2/3 of a good game today but hen totally collapsed.


Same as the rest of this team I guess. That was a massive f-up by the skaters for that 2-2 goal, creating a 2 on 0 basically right in front of Talbot. And the entire group just collapsed after that. Ran scared for their mommies.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729783 is a reply to message #729780 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
twilson1111  is currently offline twilson1111
Messages: 106
Registered: October 2010
Location: Calgary

No Cups

Yes that’s true - they all quit today. This would honestly be a good moment for a leader to separate the wheat from the chaff because it was so obvious who quit.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729782 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Just saw on Jay and Dan that Drake stared the Liker bench down as he skated by after his goal Hahahaha oh Drake.


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729788 is a reply to message #729782 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:17

Just saw on Jay and Dan that Drake stared the Liker bench down as he skated by after his goal Hahahaha oh Drake.

Eh. It looked slowed down. Who knows, maybe someone was telling him the post game meal was at Lux. Context matters. It’s not like he used his stick like a shot gun and pointed it at the owner’s box.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729802 is a reply to message #729788 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 02:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mightyreasoner  is currently offline mightyreasoner
Messages: 508
Registered: October 2005
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:31

Oscargasm wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:17

Just saw on Jay and Dan that Drake stared the Liker bench down as he skated by after his goal Hahahaha oh Drake.

Eh. It looked slowed down. Who knows, maybe someone was telling him the post game meal was at Lux. Context matters. It’s not like he used his stick like a shot gun and pointed it at the owner’s box.


But let's be honest. We all wish he had.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729784 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1519
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729785 is a reply to message #729784 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Magnum  is currently offline Magnum
Messages: 839
Registered: June 2009
Location: Rogers' Arena > Banff

No Cups

I watched the game. I wish I hadn’t.


2015/2016 - This Kool-Aid tastes like McDavid flavoured Drain-O.
2016/2017 - This Kool-Aid is starting to taste like juice.
2017/2018 - I'm drinking this Kool-Aid, in hopes that it's Drain-O.
2018/2019 - Another round of Drain-O, good sir!

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729786 is a reply to message #729784 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Magnum  is currently offline Magnum
Messages: 839
Registered: June 2009
Location: Rogers' Arena > Banff

No Cups

PlusOne wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:21

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...


Burger toss is the new jersey toss. Love it.



2015/2016 - This Kool-Aid tastes like McDavid flavoured Drain-O.
2016/2017 - This Kool-Aid is starting to taste like juice.
2017/2018 - I'm drinking this Kool-Aid, in hopes that it's Drain-O.
2018/2019 - Another round of Drain-O, good sir!

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729807 is a reply to message #729784 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 07:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5650
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

PlusOne wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 23:21

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...


Now if you threw it at the opening whistle, it 70% goes it. But if you wait till the 3rd your chances likely increase to 90%.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729830 is a reply to message #729784 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 10:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rocksteady  is currently offline Rocksteady
Messages: 478
Registered: March 2007

No Cups

PlusOne wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:21

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...


You wouldn't get my ticket for that price. You pay what I pay or I watch the ticket burn.



The very definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing expecting different results.

Generally Disappointed.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729835 is a reply to message #729830 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 10:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Rocksteady wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:10

PlusOne wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:21

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...


You wouldn't get my ticket for that price. You pay what I pay or I watch the ticket burn.

Seem like sunk cost fallacy.

During the peak Eakins era I got tickets for $8.50 US, but that was in the old building. Tickets for the Arizona game on the 19th are already down to 27. $15 might be tough, but I think $20 CAD is doable.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729840 is a reply to message #729835 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 10:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6803
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:17

Rocksteady wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:10

PlusOne wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:21

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...


You wouldn't get my ticket for that price. You pay what I pay or I watch the ticket burn.

Seem like sunk cost fallacy.

During the peak Eakins era I got tickets for $8.50 US, but that was in the old building. Tickets for the Arizona game on the 19th are already down to 27. $15 might be tough, but I think $20 CAD is doable.


Predictions on the cheapest game of the year? I've got New Jersey on Wednesday March 13th or Columbus on Thursday March 21st. Weekday games against meh teams at a point when the playoffs won't be even a faint dream any more...not even the return of Taylor Hall will get people excited to come out...



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729846 is a reply to message #729835 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 10:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mightyreasoner  is currently offline mightyreasoner
Messages: 508
Registered: October 2005
Location: Edmonton

No Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:17

Rocksteady wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:10

PlusOne wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:21

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...


You wouldn't get my ticket for that price. You pay what I pay or I watch the ticket burn.

Seem like sunk cost fallacy.

During the peak Eakins era I got tickets for $8.50 US, but that was in the old building. Tickets for the Arizona game on the 19th are already down to 27. $15 might be tough, but I think $20 CAD is doable.


Mid-January, before the wheels fell entirely off, upper bowl tickets were between $30-$40 resale on Ticketmaster. I got the Buffalo game for $35 all in, fees and everything.

I haven't had much desire to go to a game the past few weeks, so I haven't looked. It wouldn't surprise me if it is $25-$30.

Seems to be the true market value of the Oilers tickets. I fully understand why season ticket holders list as they do and don't want to sell or take a loss, but I just don't think the demand for Oilers tickets is strong these days. They are probably worth less than what season ticket holders paid, and are certainly worth less than the face value Ticketmaster sold them for at the beginning of the year.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729859 is a reply to message #729846 ]
Wed, 06 February 2019 13:06 Go to previous message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2840
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

mightyreasoner wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:30

CrusaderPi wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:17

Rocksteady wrote on Wed, 06 February 2019 10:10

PlusOne wrote on Tue, 05 February 2019 22:21

There is a chance I am in Edmonton for work near the end of the season.
The way things are going I should be able to get a ticket for what, $15?

If the results are like tonight I am too cheap to toss my McDavid or Messier jersey on the ice. I might buy a Bobby Nicks Burger and save it for the third. You can bet that mofo will be sliding across the ice.

If I aim for the net there is a solid chance it goes in...


You wouldn't get my ticket for that price. You pay what I pay or I watch the ticket burn.

Seem like sunk cost fallacy.

During the peak Eakins era I got tickets for $8.50 US, but that was in the old building. Tickets for the Arizona game on the 19th are already down to 27. $15 might be tough, but I think $20 CAD is doable.


Mid-January, before the wheels fell entirely off, upper bowl tickets were between $30-$40 resale on Ticketmaster. I got the Buffalo game for $35 all in, fees and everything.

I haven't had much desire to go to a game the past few weeks, so I haven't looked. It wouldn't surprise me if it is $25-$30.

Seems to be the true market value of the Oilers tickets. I fully understand why season ticket holders list as they do and don't want to sell or take a loss, but I just don't think the demand for Oilers tickets is strong these days. They are probably worth less than what season ticket holders paid, and are certainly worth less than the face value Ticketmaster sold them for at the beginning of the year.


Mid-week, late season, out of the playoffs games should be worth way less than the price a season ticket holder pays for them. The real value to season ticket holders are the 10-12 super-premium games a year that have FAR MORE value than a season ticket holder pays for them. Plus the guarantee of playoff tickets (cue Jim Mora Sr.) is also a premium that is included in season tickets.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53) [message #729787 is a reply to message #729738 ]
Tue, 05 February 2019 22:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
oilersfan2  is currently offline oilersfan2
Messages: 8
Registered: May 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta

No Cups

I bet McDavid is wishing he would have signed a 5yr deal. What the hell is wrong with this organization!


Shoot the puck!!

Send a private message to this user  

Pages (2): [1  2  >  »]  
Previous Topic:Pregame: Edmonton @ Minnesota (Game #54)
Next Topic:Pregame: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #53)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca