This day on March 28
None

Happy Birthday To: miker0x, GuyF, bigmike, graveyardshift, bluemiler, jrrd, Bobfromengland

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84)Pages (3): [ «  <  1  2  3  >  »]
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764501 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Oh come on. I. Hate. This. Song.


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764502 is a reply to message #764501 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7597
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:03

Oh come on. I. Hate. This. Song.

I think that’s why they still use it.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764503 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2820
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

only took 6 mins of Ticky-Tack penalties for the refs to score that one.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764504 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

CONNOR MCHATTY!!!!


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764505 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1510
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

Russell has been decent through 5 periods but it must be frustrating playing goal behind him. Koski had that one until Russell attempted the kick save and deflected it in.

McDavid hat trick! The hat throw coming down is hilarious.



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764506 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Hopefully that wakes Kass up


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764508 is a reply to message #764506 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6765
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764509 is a reply to message #764508 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764510 is a reply to message #764509 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6765
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764512 is a reply to message #764510 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I truly didn’t know they could review that?



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764519 is a reply to message #764510 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1510
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764520 is a reply to message #764519 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?


No but you can for holding the stick.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764521 is a reply to message #764520 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1510
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:23

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?


No but you can for holding the stick.


Good call!
Did he close his hand on the stick? Interference if he didnt? Either way its a weird one but I am guessing that the play wouldnt have happened if Sheahan kept his stick down so the wnent with no call, thats the best I've got?
confused2



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764522 is a reply to message #764521 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6765
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:29

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:23

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?


No but you can for holding the stick.


Good call!
Did he close his hand on the stick? Interference if he didnt? Either way its a weird one but I am guessing that the play wouldnt have happened if Sheahan kept his stick down so the wnent with no call, thats the best I've got?
confused2


Definitely closed his hand on the stick and directed it - to be fair, he was just directing it away from himself, and didn't mean to put it in Kassian's face, but still, there's a pretty good argument he should have gotten a minor at least.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764525 is a reply to message #764522 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1510
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:42

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:29

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:23

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?


No but you can for holding the stick.


Good call!
Did he close his hand on the stick? Interference if he didnt? Either way its a weird one but I am guessing that the play wouldnt have happened if Sheahan kept his stick down so the wnent with no call, thats the best I've got?
confused2


Definitely closed his hand on the stick and directed it - to be fair, he was just directing it away from himself, and didn't mean to put it in Kassian's face, but still, there's a pretty good argument he should have gotten a minor at least.


Ya, saw the highlight and for sure closed the hand.
Both sides could be argued and I dont know how one could be more right than the other.

I rarely complain about refs but there have been some pretty bad calls tonight. Although this one is the most confusing/intriguing it is far from the worst of the night.



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764547 is a reply to message #764520 ]
Tue, 04 August 2020 00:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3827
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 21:23

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?



No but you can for holding the stick.


Exactly..



McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764548 is a reply to message #764547 ]
Tue, 04 August 2020 00:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9446
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 04 August 2020 00:52

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 21:23

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?



No but you can for holding the stick.


Exactly..


Are we the first team to get screwed by this new review of high stick calls rule? :) Hope so, cause I like to feel like my team is extra special at getting screwed.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

"In Brad we trust"
- All Oilers fans, Present Day

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764558 is a reply to message #764547 ]
Tue, 04 August 2020 10:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7597
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

Skookum Jim wrote on Tue, 04 August 2020 00:52

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 21:23

PlusOne wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:09

Adam wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08

That's Strome directing Sheahan's stick in his face...bizarre.

I think they take this down to a single minor.


Or no minor? Told him to get out of the box..


Well, #$%&.

I think pushing the other guy's stick should still get you something.


I had zero idea what would happen the there.
Sheahan had his stick up, Strome pushed it away.
On one side you could argue that a player is responsible to control his stick. Kassian doesnt get hit if Sheahan keeps his stick down.
On the other side Strome pushes it into Kassian. Kassian doesnt get hit hard if not for that push.

In the end, can you even give a high stick penalty for friendly fire?



No but you can for holding the stick.


Exactly..

Yes, but you can’t review for holding the stick. The Oilers got unlucky, but it played properly.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764516 is a reply to message #764506 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HamBlaster  is currently offline HamBlaster
Messages: 764
Registered: June 2007

No Cups

Kassian is a bum so far. It would be cool if someone other than McDavid, Drai or Nuge scored a goal as well...




Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764517 is a reply to message #764516 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

HamBlaster wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:13

Kassian is a bum so far. It would be cool if someone other than McDavid, Drai or Nuge scored a goal as well...




I mean... Ennis scored tonight?



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764518 is a reply to message #764517 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HamBlaster  is currently offline HamBlaster
Messages: 764
Registered: June 2007

No Cups

Righttttt... 🤦‍♂️


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764531 is a reply to message #764516 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

HamBlaster wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:13

Kassian is a bum so far. It would be cool if someone other than McDavid, Drai or Nuge scored a goal as well...



Neal and Chiasson can be added to the list along with Ennis now.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764507 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Wait, they can review a high stick penalty?


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764511 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2820
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

You can't review minor penalties! The only thing that should have been reviewable was the excess penalty. Why did the Hawks not get a penalty?


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764513 is a reply to message #764511 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6765
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:10

You can't review minor penalties! The only thing that should have been reviewable was the excess penalty. Why did the Hawks not get a penalty?


That's the Joe Pavelski Rule. Added last year for double minors and majors to avoid a repeat of that one.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764514 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Oooh there we go, it’s the Oilers who get the penalty. This makes sense.

Did Bettman tell the refs to officiate like it’s the reg season?



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764515 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Skookum Jim  is currently offline Skookum Jim
Messages: 3827
Registered: March 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC

3 Cups

Fix is in.


McDAVID! Oh YEAH Baby!!
Tic-Tac-Tao!
Keep on Rockin' in the Free World
P. Chiarelli math.. T. Hall = A. Larsson, Yak= bag o'pucks (OK he got one right...) K. Russell = $4.1 M+NMC, G. Reinhart= M. Barzal + A. Beauvillier, J. Eberle = R. Spooner,

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764523 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

HE’S THE REAL STEAL JAMES MAAAAWBLEEPIN NEAL!


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764524 is a reply to message #764523 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6765
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Oscargasm wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:44

HE’S THE REAL STEAL JAMES MAAAAWBLEEPIN NEAL!


YEAAASSS!!!!!



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764526 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Here’s the release from the rule;


REFEREES REVIEW OF MAJOR/MATCH PENALTY CALLS AND DOUBLE MINOR HIGH-STICKING PENALTIES

MAJOR & MATCH PENALTIES: Referees will be required to conduct an on-ice video review for all Major (non-fighting) and Match Penalties they assess on the ice for the purpose of: (a) “confirming” the penalty; or (b) “reducing” the penalty to a two-minute minor penalty. Referees shall not have the option to rescind a called penalty altogether.

The Referees will be provided with all available video to review their own calls but will not otherwise consult with the NHL Situation Room with respect to their review.

DOUBLE MINOR FOR HIGH-STICKING: Referees will have the ability to conduct an on-ice video review to confirm (or not) their original call on the ice, and, in particular, whether the stick causing the apparent injury was actually the stick of the Player being penalized. The Referee’s review of all High-Sticking/Double-Minor Penalties will be discretionary and not mandatory and will be conducted without consultation with the NHL Situation Room.

https://media.nhl.com/public/news/13393?sf104452379=1



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764527 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

Thanks Calgary.. for Neal and letting Chiasser come to us.


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764528 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NetBOG  is currently offline NetBOG
Messages: 2820
Registered: January 2006
Location: Parts Unknown

2 Cups

Did they finally figure out where James Neal's on/off switch is?


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764530 is a reply to message #764528 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

NetBOG wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 22:46

Did they finally figure out where James Neal's on/off switch is?


Yeah. It was hidden behind a 3rd round pick and some truculence



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764532 is a reply to message #764530 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Leia  is currently offline Leia
Messages: 319
Registered: May 2003
Location: England

No Cups

Smith gifts them a goal on Saturday, they scored 6.... Crawford gifts us a goal in this one and we've got 6!!


If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764529 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1510
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

Flood gates are open. Keep hammering away and make a statement.
Dont cheat and allow grade A chances but please dont crawl into a shell.



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764533 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1510
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

That edibles education ad is my favorite drug ad since the eggs and "this is your brain on drugs".

I hope the goal really was to educate and not a "dont use cannabis" purpose because that makes it look pretty great. In fact, kinda gave me the munchies just watching it.



Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764534 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 22:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

AA takes 7 strides with Murphy’s stick in his arm.. no Murphy attached to it tho. Hahahahaha. Easy call.

You’re up Leon. Get off the schnide.



Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764536 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 23:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oscargasm  is currently offline Oscargasm
Messages: 5633
Registered: May 2009
Location: YEG

5 Cups

So apparently you can literally slash someone in the face, draw blood and receive just a 2 minute minor. The heck. Lol this is the same ref as the Kessler pad hold but cmon.


Survivor CHAMP S52 | S66
OG's #MUSTWIN Scale
Category 1 - Lightly Musty
Category 2 - Moderately Musty
Category 3 - Considerably Musty
Category 4 - Severely Musty
Category 5 - Incredibly Musty

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764537 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlusOne  is currently offline PlusOne
Messages: 1510
Registered: July 2006
Location: Regina, Sask

1 Cup

That one is WAY more baffling than the other high sticking play. Not a huge cut but drew blood swinging his stick and only gets 2 mins.


Survivor LX(I) and 67 Champ(i)on


CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 30 January 2020 12:21

und(i)sputed O.L.F.N Heavybra(i)n Champ(i)on of the Woooooooooooooooooorld. Plus. One.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764538 is a reply to message #764461 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 23:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
K.McC#24  is currently offline K.McC#24
Messages: 2825
Registered: March 2004
Location: ALBERTA

2 Cups

So the refs find a way and huddle to take away a 4 min pp but can't seem to give an extra 2 for blood, comical.


Send a private message to this user  

 Re: GDT: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84) [message #764539 is a reply to message #764538 ]
Mon, 03 August 2020 23:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6765
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

K.McC#24 wrote on Mon, 03 August 2020 23:02

So the refs find a way and huddle to take away a 4 min pp but can't seem to give an extra 2 for blood, comical.


Yeah, that's clear cut. Just brutal. Keith getting the veteran-on-rookie call.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

Pages (3): [ «  <  1  2  3  >  »]  
Previous Topic:GDT: Edmonton @ Chicago (Game #85)
Next Topic:Review: Chicago @ Edmonton (Game #84)
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca