This day on April 19
None

Happy Birthday To: jari17, trehorse, 5mowill, Dragon_Matt, smyth2007

F.A.Q. Terms of Use F.A.Q. F.A.Q.
Members Members   Search Search     Register Register   Login Login   Home Home
 Oilers » Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6)Pages (4): [ «  <  1  2  3  4]
Switch to flat viewSwitch to tree viewCreate a new topicSubmit Reply
 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823804 is a reply to message #823781 ]
Fri, 19 May 2023 15:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6804
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 12:26


Serious question. Can you ever have a discussion about anything Oilers related without going on a rant about the management being bad?

I am not here to get into it with you again. I get it, you don't like the management and never will. Whoever takes over from Hollands next, season, you probably would like him either. I do like this kind of stuff, the hypothetical trade and signing stuff but what is the point of engaging in a discussion when it's just going to be another management sucks rant?


This is a pretty argumentative first position if you don't want to get in to it.

It's worth noting that the reason the Oilers have dark days approaching and the possibility of Draisaitl and McDavid ending the Edmonton era of their careers without any championships to show for their time here is because the management has been so thoroughly incompetent.

I don't even really think that is a controversial position. Draisaitl was drafted by MacTavish, who floundered around as a GM. He made a lot of moves, but rarely seemed able to point the team in the right direction. He fired a coach by Zoom, he hired Eakins for a role he didn't even interview him for, he managed to devalue three of his key players before he'd even had his team play a single game with him as general manager. He put Draisaitl in the league before he was ready, and allowed him to be healthy scratched a dozen or so times before finally sending him back to junior, while bragging that he had twisted the arm of his junior team to send him to a destination of MacT's choosing - how he figured that intelligence was likely to help the Oilers, I'll never understand.

After destroying the value of his Horcoff, Hemsky and Dubnyk in his first year, he promptly set out to destroy his entire right side defence too with the Petry debacle, and then pushing forward Schultz in to a role he wasn't suited for leading to his value erosion and eventual exit. He eventually had to fire Eakins after one and a half incredibly bad seasons, but felt he couldn't just hire a new coach - rather he had to take the unprecedented step of co-coaching 6 games with Nelson.

His signings were generally terrible. He made a lot of trades, but really only two of them look any good - Paajarvi for Perron and Perron for the draft pick that became Matthew Barzal...

Oh, that leads us to McDavid's first GM - Panicky Pete Chiarelli. Chia came in with a plan. He hired a veteran coach, he drafted McDavid first overall as planned, he traded for a goalie in Talbot and then he tried to trade for Dougie Hamilton to be the cornerstone of the Edmonton defence. It was a great plan, other than the Bruins not wanting to give him Hamilton. That's fine - any good plan has some contingencies, right? Well, it's fine so long as they don't give two high draft picks away for a minor league defenceman (who fellow incompetent Tambellini and scouts considered taking #1 overall in 2012). Even with that staggering gaffe, the first season shows lots of promise. McDavid is clearly the real deal. Hall clicks immediately with Draisaitl and they put up really solid numbers. Health is the issue as McDavid, Eberle, Nugent-Hopkins, Purcell, Pouliot, Klefbom and Yakupov all miss substantial time due to injuries.

There's clearly some need to bolster the defence still, since it turned out that Reinhart wasn't an adequate replacement for Hamilton after all. Sure would have been nice to have a right shot D like Petry, or even Justin Schultz around...Nikitin and Gryba aren't quite the replacements one might have thought they'd be. No problem - the team has a high draft pick and lots of prospects. We should be able to acquire a decent defenceman for that right - I mean, after all, look at the price Calgary had to pay for Hamilton only a year earlier. Or, we could trade our leading scorer away for a defensive defenceman, sign a 29-year old power forward primed for decline, sign the worst goalie in the league as our back-up and then cross our fingers that it all works out!

Chiarelli's tenure is marked by terrible trade after terrible trade. They KNEW that the trades would be unpopular. They knew that the stats didn't support them. Rather than not doing trades that everyone would know were bad, they decided instead to try to coax media guys to cover for them and insist that the sky really is green.

Which brings us to Holland. Hugely over-rated after a career that saw him piggyback on teams with massive budgets to Stanley Cup wins over 20 years ago (and one late one in 2008 on the backs of a couple Hall of Fame players), Holland superceded a hiring process that saw our forensic auditor-in-chief Nicholson declare the need for an actual hiring process complete with real interviews of actual identified candidates. He went so far as to embarrass the entire franchise by begging other GMs to tell him what they think he should do at the league meetings. Fortunately those bought-and-paid stooge media guys were there to proclaim this a master strategy. Apparently, one of those GMs told him he should just hire Holland who was in the process of being pushed out in Detroit, where he'd taken the once proud team slowly in to the gutter. A quick look at his draft picks will show you he'd done a piss poor job there for over a decade. A look at his trade record shows about as well, other than one where he got three picks for an over-rated UFA to be. Of course, if you suck at drafting, having a bunch of extra picks isn't quite the benefit it might otherwise be.

Once here, he spent the first three years signing bad deals and making sure that our goaltending consistently sucked, while constantly trying to lower expectations of results. When he did make trades, he tended to get fleeced and repeatedly has shown that he doesn't understand cap mechanics, the loopholes other teams access, or about relative strength in bargaining. He does like fondly reminiscing on his days in Detroit, and telling people his philosophy and plans in great detail...and proving to them all that he was serious by just never doing anything surprising at all. He meekly accepts it when McDavid and Draisaitl are constantly mugged, never risking a fine by making a peep. He meekly accepts it when the league decides that the only thing that needs pro-rating in the Covid-shortened season is James Neal's results, so he's forced to give up an extra draft pick to Calgary, which they select at almost the same time he's buying out the same player. When the league goes back on their own rules to invalidate a cap benefit the Oilers would receive because of the godsent retirement of Duncan Keith - a benefit other teams have previously used when players like Luongo retired - once again it's meek acceptance. I mean, the guy doesn't even loudly condemn racists targeting one of his players after our first round loss to Winnipeg a couple years ago, instead just trying to say he doesn't know what it's about because he doesn't have social media.

He's decided now that he doesn't really like rentals - which ties his hands at the trade deadline because all the players you can get for relative bargains at that point are the guys who's contracts are expiring. Everyone else understands that, but it means that in 2021-22, he was only willing to shop the bottom of the market, getting Kulak and Brassard. He did explain prior to the trade deadline that he wasn't sure if we were in our "window" yet...so it must have been a surprise to him to see us go all the way to the semi-finals. Maybe if we'd had a little more support from management and he'd gotten a better goalie or done some more at the deadline we'd have been in better shape...I'm sure he'll do better next year right?

Nope - old dog, new tricks and all. We still have mediocre goaltending and while he makes his best move as Oilers GM in acquiring Ekholm, he packs it in early and stops even trying to improve the team. Turns out it still has plenty of holes and we're on the outside looking in again.

Who thinks he's going to fix the goaltending this summer? Anyone believe he's going to push all-in next year at the trade deadline? Who has confidence he's going to make trades and signings that meaningfully improve the team? Anyone believe he's got the savvy to manage the cap and look at using any loopholes?

Why do I talk about management when talking about what ails the Oilers? It's because management - consistent, disastrous management - is what's sunk the Oilers since Glen Sather left, other than one brilliant year in 2006 from Kevin Lowe. We're out of the playoffs today because our GM failed to recognize and address the flaws in his roster. Management is the problem - thus if we're doing any debrief, they probably SHOULD come up.

Or I suppose we could just claim that it's all because Nuge didn't get a couple more ES points...



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823805 is a reply to message #823804 ]
Fri, 19 May 2023 15:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RDOilerfan  is currently offline RDOilerfan
Messages: 3686
Registered: January 2016

3 Cups

Adam wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 15:10

RDOilerfan wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 12:26


Serious question. Can you ever have a discussion about anything Oilers related without going on a rant about the management being bad?

I am not here to get into it with you again. I get it, you don't like the management and never will. Whoever takes over from Hollands next, season, you probably would like him either. I do like this kind of stuff, the hypothetical trade and signing stuff but what is the point of engaging in a discussion when it's just going to be another management sucks rant?


This is a pretty argumentative first position if you don't want to get in to it.

It's worth noting that the reason the Oilers have dark days approaching and the possibility of Draisaitl and McDavid ending the Edmonton era of their careers without any championships to show for their time here is because the management has been so thoroughly incompetent.

I don't even really think that is a controversial position. Draisaitl was drafted by MacTavish, who floundered around as a GM. He made a lot of moves, but rarely seemed able to point the team in the right direction. He fired a coach by Zoom, he hired Eakins for a role he didn't even interview him for, he managed to devalue three of his key players before he'd even had his team play a single game with him as general manager. He put Draisaitl in the league before he was ready, and allowed him to be healthy scratched a dozen or so times before finally sending him back to junior, while bragging that he had twisted the arm of his junior team to send him to a destination of MacT's choosing - how he figured that intelligence was likely to help the Oilers, I'll never understand.

After destroying the value of his Horcoff, Hemsky and Dubnyk in his first year, he promptly set out to destroy his entire right side defence too with the Petry debacle, and then pushing forward Schultz in to a role he wasn't suited for leading to his value erosion and eventual exit. He eventually had to fire Eakins after one and a half incredibly bad seasons, but felt he couldn't just hire a new coach - rather he had to take the unprecedented step of co-coaching 6 games with Nelson.

His signings were generally terrible. He made a lot of trades, but really only two of them look any good - Paajarvi for Perron and Perron for the draft pick that became Matthew Barzal...

Oh, that leads us to McDavid's first GM - Panicky Pete Chiarelli. Chia came in with a plan. He hired a veteran coach, he drafted McDavid first overall as planned, he traded for a goalie in Talbot and then he tried to trade for Dougie Hamilton to be the cornerstone of the Edmonton defence. It was a great plan, other than the Bruins not wanting to give him Hamilton. That's fine - any good plan has some contingencies, right? Well, it's fine so long as they don't give two high draft picks away for a minor league defenceman (who fellow incompetent Tambellini and scouts considered taking #1 overall in 2012). Even with that staggering gaffe, the first season shows lots of promise. McDavid is clearly the real deal. Hall clicks immediately with Draisaitl and they put up really solid numbers. Health is the issue as McDavid, Eberle, Nugent-Hopkins, Purcell, Pouliot, Klefbom and Yakupov all miss substantial time due to injuries.

There's clearly some need to bolster the defence still, since it turned out that Reinhart wasn't an adequate replacement for Hamilton after all. Sure would have been nice to have a right shot D like Petry, or even Justin Schultz around...Nikitin and Gryba aren't quite the replacements one might have thought they'd be. No problem - the team has a high draft pick and lots of prospects. We should be able to acquire a decent defenceman for that right - I mean, after all, look at the price Calgary had to pay for Hamilton only a year earlier. Or, we could trade our leading scorer away for a defensive defenceman, sign a 29-year old power forward primed for decline, sign the worst goalie in the league as our back-up and then cross our fingers that it all works out!

Chiarelli's tenure is marked by terrible trade after terrible trade. They KNEW that the trades would be unpopular. They knew that the stats didn't support them. Rather than not doing trades that everyone would know were bad, they decided instead to try to coax media guys to cover for them and insist that the sky really is green.

Which brings us to Holland. Hugely over-rated after a career that saw him piggyback on teams with massive budgets to Stanley Cup wins over 20 years ago (and one late one in 2008 on the backs of a couple Hall of Fame players), Holland superceded a hiring process that saw our forensic auditor-in-chief Nicholson declare the need for an actual hiring process complete with real interviews of actual identified candidates. He went so far as to embarrass the entire franchise by begging other GMs to tell him what they think he should do at the league meetings. Fortunately those bought-and-paid stooge media guys were there to proclaim this a master strategy. Apparently, one of those GMs told him he should just hire Holland who was in the process of being pushed out in Detroit, where he'd taken the once proud team slowly in to the gutter. A quick look at his draft picks will show you he'd done a piss poor job there for over a decade. A look at his trade record shows about as well, other than one where he got three picks for an over-rated UFA to be. Of course, if you suck at drafting, having a bunch of extra picks isn't quite the benefit it might otherwise be.

Once here, he spent the first three years signing bad deals and making sure that our goaltending consistently sucked, while constantly trying to lower expectations of results. When he did make trades, he tended to get fleeced and repeatedly has shown that he doesn't understand cap mechanics, the loopholes other teams access, or about relative strength in bargaining. He does like fondly reminiscing on his days in Detroit, and telling people his philosophy and plans in great detail...and proving to them all that he was serious by just never doing anything surprising at all. He meekly accepts it when McDavid and Draisaitl are constantly mugged, never risking a fine by making a peep. He meekly accepts it when the league decides that the only thing that needs pro-rating in the Covid-shortened season is James Neal's results, so he's forced to give up an extra draft pick to Calgary, which they select at almost the same time he's buying out the same player. When the league goes back on their own rules to invalidate a cap benefit the Oilers would receive because of the godsent retirement of Duncan Keith - a benefit other teams have previously used when players like Luongo retired - once again it's meek acceptance. I mean, the guy doesn't even loudly condemn racists targeting one of his players after our first round loss to Winnipeg a couple years ago, instead just trying to say he doesn't know what it's about because he doesn't have social media.

He's decided now that he doesn't really like rentals - which ties his hands at the trade deadline because all the players you can get for relative bargains at that point are the guys who's contracts are expiring. Everyone else understands that, but it means that in 2021-22, he was only willing to shop the bottom of the market, getting Kulak and Brassard. He did explain prior to the trade deadline that he wasn't sure if we were in our "window" yet...so it must have been a surprise to him to see us go all the way to the semi-finals. Maybe if we'd had a little more support from management and he'd gotten a better goalie or done some more at the deadline we'd have been in better shape...I'm sure he'll do better next year right?

Nope - old dog, new tricks and all. We still have mediocre goaltending and while he makes his best move as Oilers GM in acquiring Ekholm, he packs it in early and stops even trying to improve the team. Turns out it still has plenty of holes and we're on the outside looking in again.

Who thinks he's going to fix the goaltending this summer? Anyone believe he's going to push all-in next year at the trade deadline? Who has confidence he's going to make trades and signings that meaningfully improve the team? Anyone believe he's got the savvy to manage the cap and look at using any loopholes?

Why do I talk about management when talking about what ails the Oilers? It's because management - consistent, disastrous management - is what's sunk the Oilers since Glen Sather left, other than one brilliant year in 2006 from Kevin Lowe. We're out of the playoffs today because our GM failed to recognize and address the flaws in his roster. Management is the problem - thus if we're doing any debrief, they probably SHOULD come up.

Or I suppose we could just claim that it's all because Nuge didn't get a couple more ES points...

It could have been a simple yes or no question but it's a legit one. How does a discussion take place with someone when their response to everything is how much the team sucks. What's the point. You just wrote a giant page ranting about past moves so you proved my point. You think they are incompetent so discussing moves with you is a waste of everyone's times so why do you even ask anyone to give you their suggestions when all you will do is point out other moves you didn't like.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823812 is a reply to message #823805 ]
Fri, 19 May 2023 15:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 15:18


It could have been a simple yes or no question but it's a legit one. How does a discussion take place with someone when their response to everything is how much the team sucks. What's the point. You just wrote a giant page ranting about past moves so you proved my point. You think they are incompetent so discussing moves with you is a waste of everyone's times so why do you even ask anyone to give you their suggestions when all you will do is point out other moves you didn't like.

Because the past is a very good tool for predicting the future and there is a subset of fans who ignore the Oilers past practices in hopes that a desired outcome is created. I'll also point out that discussing what we think the Oilers should do is very different from discussion what we think they will do. There is room for both.

Again, if you don't like discussing the Oilers objectively bad management (see above) and how it has impacted the Oilers, don't. Some of us here really enjoy it. Trying to tell anyone that management isn't germane to an Oilers discussion, especially in an offseason thread is foolish.



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823813 is a reply to message #823812 ]
Fri, 19 May 2023 16:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ragnarok73  is currently offline Ragnarok73
Messages: 2343
Registered: February 2011

2 Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 15:47

RDOilerfan wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 15:18


It could have been a simple yes or no question but it's a legit one. How does a discussion take place with someone when their response to everything is how much the team sucks. What's the point. You just wrote a giant page ranting about past moves so you proved my point. You think they are incompetent so discussing moves with you is a waste of everyone's times so why do you even ask anyone to give you their suggestions when all you will do is point out other moves you didn't like.

Because the past is a very good tool for predicting the future and there is a subset of fans who ignore the Oilers past practices in hopes that a desired outcome is created. I'll also point out that discussing what we think the Oilers should do is very different from discussion what we think they will do. There is room for both.

Again, if you don't like discussing the Oilers objectively bad management (see above) and how it has impacted the Oilers, don't. Some of us here really enjoy it. Trying to tell anyone that management isn't germane to an Oilers discussion, especially in an offseason thread is foolish.

What I am hoping now is that the acquisition of Ekholm doesn't make Holland think he is the %@#$ as a GM right before going on to make a dozen terrible moves that more than undo all the good that getting Matthias did the team.



"There's no greater springboard to development than failure." - Craig MacTavish, April 13/15.

5-14-6-1

"Sabres think the suck is their ally? They merely adopted the suck. The Oilers were born in it...molded by it."

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823844 is a reply to message #823805 ]
Sun, 21 May 2023 18:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g2k  is currently offline g2k
Messages: 2615
Registered: January 2003
Location: The Hood

2 Cups

RDOilerfan wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 15:18

Adam wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 15:10

RDOilerfan wrote on Fri, 19 May 2023 12:26


Serious question. Can you ever have a discussion about anything Oilers related without going on a rant about the management being bad?

I am not here to get into it with you again. I get it, you don't like the management and never will. Whoever takes over from Hollands next, season, you probably would like him either. I do like this kind of stuff, the hypothetical trade and signing stuff but what is the point of engaging in a discussion when it's just going to be another management sucks rant?


This is a pretty argumentative first position if you don't want to get in to it.

It's worth noting that the reason the Oilers have dark days approaching and the possibility of Draisaitl and McDavid ending the Edmonton era of their careers without any championships to show for their time here is because the management has been so thoroughly incompetent.

I don't even really think that is a controversial position. Draisaitl was drafted by MacTavish, who floundered around as a GM. He made a lot of moves, but rarely seemed able to point the team in the right direction. He fired a coach by Zoom, he hired Eakins for a role he didn't even interview him for, he managed to devalue three of his key players before he'd even had his team play a single game with him as general manager. He put Draisaitl in the league before he was ready, and allowed him to be healthy scratched a dozen or so times before finally sending him back to junior, while bragging that he had twisted the arm of his junior team to send him to a destination of MacT's choosing - how he figured that intelligence was likely to help the Oilers, I'll never understand.

After destroying the value of his Horcoff, Hemsky and Dubnyk in his first year, he promptly set out to destroy his entire right side defence too with the Petry debacle, and then pushing forward Schultz in to a role he wasn't suited for leading to his value erosion and eventual exit. He eventually had to fire Eakins after one and a half incredibly bad seasons, but felt he couldn't just hire a new coach - rather he had to take the unprecedented step of co-coaching 6 games with Nelson.

His signings were generally terrible. He made a lot of trades, but really only two of them look any good - Paajarvi for Perron and Perron for the draft pick that became Matthew Barzal...

Oh, that leads us to McDavid's first GM - Panicky Pete Chiarelli. Chia came in with a plan. He hired a veteran coach, he drafted McDavid first overall as planned, he traded for a goalie in Talbot and then he tried to trade for Dougie Hamilton to be the cornerstone of the Edmonton defence. It was a great plan, other than the Bruins not wanting to give him Hamilton. That's fine - any good plan has some contingencies, right? Well, it's fine so long as they don't give two high draft picks away for a minor league defenceman (who fellow incompetent Tambellini and scouts considered taking #1 overall in 2012). Even with that staggering gaffe, the first season shows lots of promise. McDavid is clearly the real deal. Hall clicks immediately with Draisaitl and they put up really solid numbers. Health is the issue as McDavid, Eberle, Nugent-Hopkins, Purcell, Pouliot, Klefbom and Yakupov all miss substantial time due to injuries.

There's clearly some need to bolster the defence still, since it turned out that Reinhart wasn't an adequate replacement for Hamilton after all. Sure would have been nice to have a right shot D like Petry, or even Justin Schultz around...Nikitin and Gryba aren't quite the replacements one might have thought they'd be. No problem - the team has a high draft pick and lots of prospects. We should be able to acquire a decent defenceman for that right - I mean, after all, look at the price Calgary had to pay for Hamilton only a year earlier. Or, we could trade our leading scorer away for a defensive defenceman, sign a 29-year old power forward primed for decline, sign the worst goalie in the league as our back-up and then cross our fingers that it all works out!

Chiarelli's tenure is marked by terrible trade after terrible trade. They KNEW that the trades would be unpopular. They knew that the stats didn't support them. Rather than not doing trades that everyone would know were bad, they decided instead to try to coax media guys to cover for them and insist that the sky really is green.

Which brings us to Holland. Hugely over-rated after a career that saw him piggyback on teams with massive budgets to Stanley Cup wins over 20 years ago (and one late one in 2008 on the backs of a couple Hall of Fame players), Holland superceded a hiring process that saw our forensic auditor-in-chief Nicholson declare the need for an actual hiring process complete with real interviews of actual identified candidates. He went so far as to embarrass the entire franchise by begging other GMs to tell him what they think he should do at the league meetings. Fortunately those bought-and-paid stooge media guys were there to proclaim this a master strategy. Apparently, one of those GMs told him he should just hire Holland who was in the process of being pushed out in Detroit, where he'd taken the once proud team slowly in to the gutter. A quick look at his draft picks will show you he'd done a piss poor job there for over a decade. A look at his trade record shows about as well, other than one where he got three picks for an over-rated UFA to be. Of course, if you suck at drafting, having a bunch of extra picks isn't quite the benefit it might otherwise be.

Once here, he spent the first three years signing bad deals and making sure that our goaltending consistently sucked, while constantly trying to lower expectations of results. When he did make trades, he tended to get fleeced and repeatedly has shown that he doesn't understand cap mechanics, the loopholes other teams access, or about relative strength in bargaining. He does like fondly reminiscing on his days in Detroit, and telling people his philosophy and plans in great detail...and proving to them all that he was serious by just never doing anything surprising at all. He meekly accepts it when McDavid and Draisaitl are constantly mugged, never risking a fine by making a peep. He meekly accepts it when the league decides that the only thing that needs pro-rating in the Covid-shortened season is James Neal's results, so he's forced to give up an extra draft pick to Calgary, which they select at almost the same time he's buying out the same player. When the league goes back on their own rules to invalidate a cap benefit the Oilers would receive because of the godsent retirement of Duncan Keith - a benefit other teams have previously used when players like Luongo retired - once again it's meek acceptance. I mean, the guy doesn't even loudly condemn racists targeting one of his players after our first round loss to Winnipeg a couple years ago, instead just trying to say he doesn't know what it's about because he doesn't have social media.

He's decided now that he doesn't really like rentals - which ties his hands at the trade deadline because all the players you can get for relative bargains at that point are the guys who's contracts are expiring. Everyone else understands that, but it means that in 2021-22, he was only willing to shop the bottom of the market, getting Kulak and Brassard. He did explain prior to the trade deadline that he wasn't sure if we were in our "window" yet...so it must have been a surprise to him to see us go all the way to the semi-finals. Maybe if we'd had a little more support from management and he'd gotten a better goalie or done some more at the deadline we'd have been in better shape...I'm sure he'll do better next year right?

Nope - old dog, new tricks and all. We still have mediocre goaltending and while he makes his best move as Oilers GM in acquiring Ekholm, he packs it in early and stops even trying to improve the team. Turns out it still has plenty of holes and we're on the outside looking in again.

Who thinks he's going to fix the goaltending this summer? Anyone believe he's going to push all-in next year at the trade deadline? Who has confidence he's going to make trades and signings that meaningfully improve the team? Anyone believe he's got the savvy to manage the cap and look at using any loopholes?

Why do I talk about management when talking about what ails the Oilers? It's because management - consistent, disastrous management - is what's sunk the Oilers since Glen Sather left, other than one brilliant year in 2006 from Kevin Lowe. We're out of the playoffs today because our GM failed to recognize and address the flaws in his roster. Management is the problem - thus if we're doing any debrief, they probably SHOULD come up.

Or I suppose we could just claim that it's all because Nuge didn't get a couple more ES points...

It could have been a simple yes or no question but it's a legit one. How does a discussion take place with someone when their response to everything is how much the team sucks. What's the point. You just wrote a giant page ranting about past moves so you proved my point. You think they are incompetent so discussing moves with you is a waste of everyone's times so why do you even ask anyone to give you their suggestions when all you will do is point out other moves you didn't like.

How ironic seeing you whine about giant pages involving rants.

I don't read most of your posts for that very reason.

Tell us he’s wrong this time. I will actually read this one, regardless of length.



#firebob #screwitjustselltheteam #ownerisacreep

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823851 is a reply to message #823804 ]
Sun, 21 May 2023 23:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rutuu  is currently offline Rutuu
Messages: 106
Registered: March 2011
Location: Brisbane

No Cups

Reading this makes me realize what a BRILLIANT job Kevin Lowe has done the last few years to insulate himself from the management disaster.

He even got himself into the HOF. Absolute wizard.

As for my original comment that our window is the next few years, I was trying to be positive.

icon_biggrin



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823843 is a reply to message #823557 ]
Sun, 21 May 2023 17:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
inverno76  is currently offline inverno76
Messages: 2104
Registered: September 2005
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchew...

2 Cups

What depressing trip down memory lane Adam took me on. All truths and it’s why this generation of fans will always be skeptics of the Oilers. I need a lot Ekholm trades, before I forget heart aches.

As for MacT strong arming the Prince Albert Raiders? That one had me so pissed. Kept Draisaitl up when he shouldn’t have been, and the Raiders got 2 players and 2 picks who had zero impact on the junior team in anyway (Spencer Mie was a depth forward on there WHL Championship team in 2019.

Damn you MacT. Damn you to hell.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #823847 is a reply to message #823557 ]
Sun, 21 May 2023 19:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rowan Oil Fielding  is currently offline Rowan Oil Fielding
Messages: 162
Registered: July 2018

No Cups

Figure this is the place to put this video about possible free agents.

https://www.youtube.com/live/8eZwwKd4Np8?feature=share

[Updated on: Sun, 21 May 2023 19:33]


https://i.postimg.cc/mZ9GD3V6/php2-CH3-Yf-AM.jpg

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824227 is a reply to message #823557 ]
Mon, 12 June 2023 23:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9535
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Another area of concern this summer. Coaching, defense specifically. I've seen people mentioning this Marchessault quote and it really is a burn.

From: https://edmontonjournal.com/sports/hockey/nhl/cult-of-hockey /darnell-nurse-and-cody-ceci-are-taking-too-much-blame-for-e dmontons-playoff-loss


“If we keep bringing pucks to the net, we know they play man-on-man in the d-zone, so we just have to beat our guy to the net, and we can get bounces there.”


This man on man coverage that had Ceci and Nurse more than anyone else chasing guys 30 ft from the net was an absolute killer. Even worse, our forwards seemed to have no clue how to cover for them. We must be the only team in the playoffs that didn't know how to just collapse to the net to block players out and stop secondary opportunities.

If this was indeed a plan enforced by coaching, I'm not sure it matters who we get to play D on this team, we may be screwed. Better fix that up, it's idiotic. Teams notice you doing this and they will just chill out, pull you out of position and just dash away when the time is right and always have a step. Exactly what Vegas did to us, more and more as the series went on. We got McLellan'd to an extent by McLellan's protege.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824319 is a reply to message #823557 ]
Thu, 15 June 2023 11:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam  is currently offline Adam
Messages: 6804
Registered: August 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB

6 Cups

Quote:

Sid
@NHL_Sid
In that series, Edmonton out-scored Vegas 8 - 7 with Eichel off-ice at 5v5, but Vegas out-scored them 8 - 1 with Eichel. That killed them.

No Oilers player played more against Eichel than Ceci, who was on-ice for 5 of those 8 goals. Bjugstad played more against him than McDavid.

...

One of the following two things happened here.

A) Woodcroft was fully aware of this data, but chose to ignore it, and continued matching Nurse/Ceci against Eichel.
B) Woodcroft wasn't aware of this data at all.

Either way, it's an awful look.



One thing I've thought interesting the last two years is that I like regular season Woodcroft a lot better than Playoff Woody. Maybe he's over-thinking the post-season, or maybe like his mentor, he's not good at adjustments in a prolonged series, but he clearly has some work to do if he's not going to end up a perennial loser like McLellan.

There's this, and there's the man-to-man defence that's been discussed and then there's even the decision to just try to completely out-bully the Kings in Round One that led to us just constantly being short-handed. It was clearly a coaching decision that we were going to be extremely aggressive to start the post-season, and it cost us a couple of games against the Kings.



"Thinking that a bad team's best players are the reason the team is bad is the "Tambellini re-signing Lennart Petrell" of sports opinions." @Woodguy55
#FireLowe #FireBobbyNicks #FireKenHolland #FireKeithGretzky

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824321 is a reply to message #824319 ]
Thu, 15 June 2023 12:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike  is currently offline Mike
Messages: 1059
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick

1 Cup

Adam wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:46

There's this, and there's the man-to-man defence that's been discussed and then there's even the decision to just try to completely out-bully the Kings in Round One that led to us just constantly being short-handed. It was clearly a coaching decision that we were going to be extremely aggressive to start the post-season, and it cost us a couple of games against the Kings.


And IMO, the most egregious, not starting Campbell in game 6. I'm by no means a Campbell fanboy, but after Skinner's 3rd hook of the playoffs/2nd of that series, and with Campbell having some of the all time best numbers (despite making me incredibly nervous every time the puck went his way). Yes it was a small sample size, but Skinner was shaken. Campbell looked chaotic as ever, but he managed to keep the puck out. .961% and 1.01GAA in 118 minutes are crazy good numbers.



Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824329 is a reply to message #824321 ]
Thu, 15 June 2023 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stemhovlichski  is currently offline stemhovlichski
Messages: 346
Registered: March 2006
Location: NSR

No Cups

Mike wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 12:57

Adam wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:46

There's this, and there's the man-to-man defence that's been discussed and then there's even the decision to just try to completely out-bully the Kings in Round One that led to us just constantly being short-handed. It was clearly a coaching decision that we were going to be extremely aggressive to start the post-season, and it cost us a couple of games against the Kings.


And IMO, the most egregious, not starting Campbell in game 6. I'm by no means a Campbell fanboy, but after Skinner's 3rd hook of the playoffs/2nd of that series, and with Campbell having some of the all time best numbers (despite making me incredibly nervous every time the puck went his way). Yes it was a small sample size, but Skinner was shaken. Campbell looked chaotic as ever, but he managed to keep the puck out. .961% and 1.01GAA in 118 minutes are crazy good numbers.


In defence of Woody, Campbell was a crappy starter for most of the season. Stuey was shakey but started games okay, then melted under pressure. Bad place for a coach to be in - management knew the goaltending was an issue but did nothing aggressive. Vegas had a backup, Oilers had a dilemma.



Restored: "We're sucking hind banana here." - Pat Quinn, Jan 18, 2010

"...the Oilers have been rebuilding for so long that it’s hard not to be cynical." - NBC's Ryan Dadoun Jan 2, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824330 is a reply to message #824329 ]
Thu, 15 June 2023 14:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CrusaderPi  is currently offline CrusaderPi
Messages: 7632
Registered: December 2003
Location: AB Highway 100

6 Cups

stemhovlichski wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:31

Mike wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 12:57

Adam wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:46

There's this, and there's the man-to-man defence that's been discussed and then there's even the decision to just try to completely out-bully the Kings in Round One that led to us just constantly being short-handed. It was clearly a coaching decision that we were going to be extremely aggressive to start the post-season, and it cost us a couple of games against the Kings.


And IMO, the most egregious, not starting Campbell in game 6. I'm by no means a Campbell fanboy, but after Skinner's 3rd hook of the playoffs/2nd of that series, and with Campbell having some of the all time best numbers (despite making me incredibly nervous every time the puck went his way). Yes it was a small sample size, but Skinner was shaken. Campbell looked chaotic as ever, but he managed to keep the puck out. .961% and 1.01GAA in 118 minutes are crazy good numbers.


In defence of Woody, Campbell was a crappy starter for most of the season. Stuey was shakey but started games okay, then melted under pressure. Bad place for a coach to be in - management knew the goaltending was an issue but did nothing aggressive. Vegas had a backup, Oilers had a dilemma.

Yeah, starting Campbell is 100% the right answer in retrospect but it's still a hard case to make. You almost have to start Skinner in game 5, coming off of a win, when the series is tied 2-2. Starting Campbell in game 6 then means the Oilers are putting the season in the hands of a goalie that hadn't started in a month and lost the job half a season ago. If that doesn't work (and I think Vegas wins either way) it looks like the whole organization panicked. I think dilemma is underselling it. The Oilers had the Kobayashi Maru.

Starting Campbell in game 4 though....



Please do not feed the bears. Feeding the bears creates a dependent population unable to survive on their own. Bears.

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824337 is a reply to message #824330 ]
Thu, 15 June 2023 22:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stemhovlichski  is currently offline stemhovlichski
Messages: 346
Registered: March 2006
Location: NSR

No Cups

CrusaderPi wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:48

stemhovlichski wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:31

Mike wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 12:57

Adam wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:46

There's this, and there's the man-to-man defence that's been discussed and then there's even the decision to just try to completely out-bully the Kings in Round One that led to us just constantly being short-handed. It was clearly a coaching decision that we were going to be extremely aggressive to start the post-season, and it cost us a couple of games against the Kings.


And IMO, the most egregious, not starting Campbell in game 6. I'm by no means a Campbell fanboy, but after Skinner's 3rd hook of the playoffs/2nd of that series, and with Campbell having some of the all time best numbers (despite making me incredibly nervous every time the puck went his way). Yes it was a small sample size, but Skinner was shaken. Campbell looked chaotic as ever, but he managed to keep the puck out. .961% and 1.01GAA in 118 minutes are crazy good numbers.


In defence of Woody, Campbell was a crappy starter for most of the season. Stuey was shakey but started games okay, then melted under pressure. Bad place for a coach to be in - management knew the goaltending was an issue but did nothing aggressive. Vegas had a backup, Oilers had a dilemma.

Yeah, starting Campbell is 100% the right answer in retrospect but it's still a hard case to make. You almost have to start Skinner in game 5, coming off of a win, when the series is tied 2-2. Starting Campbell in game 6 then means the Oilers are putting the season in the hands of a goalie that hadn't started in a month and lost the job half a season ago. If that doesn't work (and I think Vegas wins either way) it looks like the whole organization panicked. I think dilemma is underselling it. The Oilers had the Kobayashi Maru.

Starting Campbell in game 4 though....


William Shatner - Oilers goalie coach 2023-24.



Restored: "We're sucking hind banana here." - Pat Quinn, Jan 18, 2010

"...the Oilers have been rebuilding for so long that it’s hard not to be cynical." - NBC's Ryan Dadoun Jan 2, 2015

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824331 is a reply to message #824321 ]
Thu, 15 June 2023 16:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kr55  is currently offline Kr55
Messages: 9535
Registered: May 2002
Location: Edmonton

6 Cups

Mike wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 12:57

Adam wrote on Thu, 15 June 2023 14:46

There's this, and there's the man-to-man defence that's been discussed and then there's even the decision to just try to completely out-bully the Kings in Round One that led to us just constantly being short-handed. It was clearly a coaching decision that we were going to be extremely aggressive to start the post-season, and it cost us a couple of games against the Kings.


And IMO, the most egregious, not starting Campbell in game 6. I'm by no means a Campbell fanboy, but after Skinner's 3rd hook of the playoffs/2nd of that series, and with Campbell having some of the all time best numbers (despite making me incredibly nervous every time the puck went his way). Yes it was a small sample size, but Skinner was shaken. Campbell looked chaotic as ever, but he managed to keep the puck out. .961% and 1.01GAA in 118 minutes are crazy good numbers.


Honestly I would have considered it a couple bad games before that. I'm usually pretty forgiving and optimistic with goalies but Skinner looked really off for me almost all playoffs. Not every guy is up for the pressure of their first NHL playoffs. You always dream of a Binnington or Murray (or Hill) to just come in and save the day, but that's far more rare than guys that buckle under the pressure. The latest I would have gone was the 2nd loss against Vegas, he looked just bad, 2nd effort gone, just looking like a sagging goalie. He had very little to do with the game 4 win, we dominated that game and gave up very little quality chances.

I know the D made mistakes and our game plan was picked apart, especially in the Vegas series, but Skinner didn't help much at all. We had to completely dominate chances to even get close to a 50/50 shot to win throughout.

Oh well, hopefully Woody learned a lesson about goalies. And it remains a massive risk to stick with these 2 next year.



"We need to get better immediately. That starts today"
- Lowe, 2013

"Next year I would forecast as another developmental year"
- MacT, 2015

5 x $5,000,000

Send a private message to this user  

 Re: Review: Vegas @ Edmonton (Game #6) [message #824341 is a reply to message #824331 ]
Fri, 16 June 2023 12:56 Go to previous message
Dragon_Matt  is currently offline Dragon_Matt
Messages: 709
Registered: January 2009
Location: edmonton

No Cups

More than that. If you really want to rub salt in your own wounds, go back and watch our last two losses. Watch Skinner early on. How he's standing, how he's moving, how he plays and controls the puck. It was clear to see something was wrong with him.
I would have absolutely started him in net (even previously when he's been pulled he came back and had thundering performances) but he looked off before letting in the 1st goal and shouldn't have been there.
That being said, I still think the crease is his to lose to start 23-24.



Send a private message to this user  

Pages (4): [ «  <  1  2  3  4]  
Previous Topic:Kassian traded to AZ
Next Topic:Derek Ryan Re-signs with the Oilers
Oilers NHL Minors Speculation For Sale 


Copyright © OilFans.com 1996-2022.
All content is property of OilFans.com and cannot be used without expressed, written consent from this site.
Questions, comments and suggestions can be directed to oilfans@OilFans.com
Privacy Statement


Hosted by LogicalHosting.ca